OPINION
Ortom’s Performance and Public Opinion

By Jerome-Mario Utomi
The United State Supreme Court is not the highest in our land. Our highest court is the court of public opinion which meets every hour- Seltel (1987)
“The public welfare demands that constitutional cases must be decided according to the terms of the Constitution itself, and not according to judges’ views of fairness, reasonableness, or justice.
I have no fear of constitutional amendments properly adopted, but I do fear the rewriting of the Constitution by judges under the guise of interpretation. ”—Hugo L. Black
Democracy taken objectively signifies the right to choose.
Public opinion/communication on its part matters in every democratic setting. In fact, there exists this global belief that the viability of democracy depends upon the openness, reliability, appropriateness, and two-way nature of the communication environment.However, despite these virtues and attributes of public opinion particularly in a democratic dispensation, there exists also a superior/school of thought that counters such claims.
It says; even in a democracy, the government is at liberty to take or discard advice and public opinion in the interest of greater good for the greater number. Public opinion, in its view, does not always provide clear-cut policy guidance, and even when it is clearly in favour of a certain course of government action, the authorities may decide otherwise-particularly when they realize how uninformed, superficial, and changeable most opinions really are.
Government it added may also reject the people’s opinion as a result of its own convictions, the recommendations of the public service, or the pressure of advocacy groups. Whenever the government fails to follow a clear-cut preference among the public opinion, they may actually be relying on a deeper understanding of the issue, the greater information at their disposal, a more sophisticated analysis of its implications, a concern for minority groups’ rights, or a less prejudicial attitude. it concluded.
Despite the validity of the above declaration, I believed and still believe in the efficacy and validity of public opinion particularly to people in government, for without it, there exist no other way the government will be abreast of what the people are wanting and doing.
However, if there is any exception in recent time that deeply demonstrate how uninformed, superficial, and changeable some opinion paddlers could be when exercising this right conferred on them by the instrumentality of democracy and election of leaders, and significantly explains why some opinions from the people needs to be ignored, it is the slanted x-ray/assessment of the performance of Mr. Samuel Ortom, the Executive Governor of Benue state by some commentators and self styled public affairs analysts.
Peripherally, their opinion pieces sighted in online news platforms and opinion pages of conventional newspapers appear so smooth that anybody who read their accounts would think that the picture they painted was real and the trickle down effect was already taking place on the people of the state.
Before getting down to the nitty gritty of their claims, it will be pertinent to look deeply, and classify their analysis/concerns into three parts.
For many in this group, Ortom’s constructive debate with the government at the centre on how best to lead and build a nation is viewed as unnecessary, messy and divisive; his differing political ideas and strategies are perceived as destructive to the nation’s interest. So, they are of the view that Mr. Governor needs to defocus on his persistent and unabating call on the government at the centre to provide security and adhere to the rule of law.
Others believe that since the interest of Benue is well represented at the centre via appointments of some of its sons/daughter into positions of authority, such appointment/magnanimity signposts Mr. President’s love for the state. Therefore, by interpretation, what The President deserves from the Government in the state, are namely; praise, respect-and not vilification or disparagement. To the rest, Governor Ortom, should let the Federal Government be; he should concentrate and get preoccupied with issues that have to do with payment of Benue state workers salaries and infrastructural deployment in the state. They predicted their claim on the allegation that workers in the state are owed salaries while the state as a whole suffers infrastructural deficiencies.
At this point, it is of considerable significance to state that this piece is neither out to submit Governor Ortom’s scorecard to the general public, nor to launder the efforts/ image of his administration. But, like a boil that can never be cured as long as it is covered up, the piece is aimed at opening with all its pus-flowing ugliness, the boils of inaccuracies, injustices, asymmetrical information/disinformation, innuendos against the Governor, democracy and good governance, to the natural medicine of truth, justice and the light of human conscience and the air of national and natural opinion.
For one thing, the issues raised- particularly the concern that has to do with nonpayment of workers’ salaries/pension and infrastructural deficiency could have been condemned in strongest terms if they were found to be true because a Latin dictum observes that; “Salus populi suprema lex esto [the welfare of the people shall be the supreme law].” But sadly, this cannot be as the orchestrated allegations have since been uncovered to exist only in frames. In fact, factually supported counter commentaries eminently suggest that the Governor ceaselessly performs his leadership role in this direction at the most fundamental level.
With the above highlighted, let’s focus on other ills that plagued such claims and arguments.
Beginning with inordinate appreciation of infrastructure and political appointment over Governor Ortom’s call for security and rule of law, the question may be asked; which is most essential; security of lives and property or provision of infrastructure and political appointment? Still on the argument about choice of salaries/infrastructure over security, it reveals a mindset with thoughtless understanding of leadership as a mere payment of salaries on the one hand, and ‘cement and concrete arrangement’ on the other hands. Broadly speaking, their deformed logic again elicits the question; when did provision of infrastructure/payment of salaries become a stronger key Performance indicator (KPI) for measuring leadership success than provision of security of lives and property?
While an answer(s) to the above question is awaited, it will not in any way be characterized as hasty to conclude that these misguided priorities demonstrated by Ortom’s critics, explain why Nigerians presently applaud and vote those who ordinarily, should have nothing to do with governance.
Specifically, Governor Ortom in my views may not be a saint but his type/kind in Nigeria’s leadership corridor is in short supply. Take as an illustration, at the wake of incessant clashes and killings of Benue people by those suspected to be Fulani herders; he enacted the anti open grazing law in the state to tame the situation. Yet the killing spray continued, houses destroyed and burnt down. In the face of these ugly developments, such killers were never apprehended, even when they make self implicating statements about such killings.
Instead of criticism, one would have expected, as responsible and responsive indigenes of the state, these critics of the Governor to dissipate such energy interrogating; why the legislative framework is not providing a strong source of remedy/solution for individuals and communities? And most importantly, why is it not effective and enforceable?
Asking these questions no doubt would have again exposed those who control security architectures in the country as well as underscore the expediency of state police to meet the nation’s security changing needs currently demanded by Ortom and other development-minded Governors and true Federalism proponents. Such a probe would have at the very least revealed who is failing in its responsibility as a leader; whether Federal or state?
Away from security concerns to the claim that appointment of some sons/daughter of Benue origin to positions of authority at the centre signposts love for the state. This argument again is not only laughable but cannot hold water when faced with embarrassing facts. It sadly speaks volume of a people that are ready to offer the security of their people on the altar of political appointments while pointing to why democracy in the country is downgraded to the level that it neither underwrites social justice nor guarantees social mobility.
Let’s look at the particulars of this claim.
Beginning with reality, if the likes of Ortom are to keep quiet from offering their sentiment on a matter such as security which involves the most serious and alarming consequences, it means reason is of no use to us; the freedom of speech may be taken away, and dumb and silent we may be led, like sheep to the slaughter.Regardless of what others may say, there is no way Ortom, a onetime business man and entrepreneur, could not call on Mr. President to rise up to his responsibility of securing the nation, as he (Ortom) understands that the efficiency of the government particularly in the areas of security and economy, does not affect the performance of the public sector alone. Rather, it affects that of the whole country, including the private sector (Business). When the public sector’s achievements pick up speed, the increased pace extends to the activities. ‘What investors are more particular about is the rule of law and the independence of the judiciary because unlike security where they can take care of the protection of their staff and assets, they cannot appoint their own Judges to sit on any litigations they are involved in’.
To therefore catalyze nation building, it is in my views that instead of advocating for unhealthy truces, ‘technical rationalities/ rationality without morality, or generating spurious arguments on why the Governors should cease commenting on state of the nation, it will be more rewarding if true lovers of this nation remembers that getting the people to believe or committed to a leader at the centre depends largely on the credibility and track-records of such leader, their vision/content of their message, reputation and the consistency between their words and deeds. Governance they say is not about the originality of vision but how well the vision serves the interest of the people. It is no longer a secret that the vision of the present administration at the centre has not served the people well.
As the debate rages, well meaning Nigerians are in agreement that separate from being a national leader that is well respected by all, Ortom is among the few public office holders that have played politics in the country using global rules and dictates. He is in the opinion of this piece exposed to the present attack not because there is an established link with non performance, but primarily because, the accusers feel that he occupies a public office and therefore, lacks the right to private living.
Utomi, is the Programme Coordinator (Media and Public Policy), Social and Economic Justice Advocacy (SEJA), Lagos.
OPINION
Repositioning Nigeria amidst Global Trade, Tariff Tensions
By Rukayat Moisemhe
Recent trade tensions between the United States (U.S.) and several countries have created unprecedented economic challenges, likewise some opportunities across the global economic terrain.As with most tensed situations, many victims, countries in this case, suffer varying degrees of effects, depending on their fortifications, preparedness and abilities to navigate economic turbulences.
The U. S. had on April 2 declared a 14 per cent tariff on all Nigerian exports and this development had broad implications on the country’s trade balance and its economic diversification agenda.Also, the fate of many of its Micro, Small and Medium Enterprises (MSMEs) alongside players in the manufacturing and agricultural sector appears to be in the balance due to the development.While Nigeria has towed the consultations route with U.S and World Trade Organisation (WTO) on how to turn the situation to benefit the country, some economic stakeholders have lent their voices on the way forward.Director-General, Chartered Institute of Directors Nigeria (CIoD), Dr Bamidele Alimi, noted that in response to the shifting trade policies globally, companies must seek to restructure their operations.Alimi noted that amidst the difficulties of the tariff impositions lied potential advantages, including new trade partnerships, alternative export markets, and investment possibilities.He stated that the current trade situation may create strategic opportunities for forward-thinking businesses, prompting a realignment of global trade partnerships, potentially benefitting Nigeria.According to him, this could help develop stronger trade relationships with countries affected by the tariff war, potentially opening new export markets.“As China and other tariff-affected countries seek alternative destinations for their products, our nation might become an attractive investment destination.“This could lead to technology transfer and manufacturing expansion, potentially strengthening local production capabilities and creating jobs.“Businesses that are prepared to form strategic partnerships with international companies seeking to circumvent tariffs might find unprecedented growth opportunities,” he said.Alimi advocated stronger intra-African trade networks to provide some insulation against external trade disputes whilst creating new markets for Nigerian products throughout the continent.He also urged businesses to consider forming industry associations or cooperative arrangements to increase their collective bargaining power when dealing with international suppliers and customers.President, Lagos Chamber of Commerce and Industry (LCCI), Mr Gabriel Idahosa, stated that to navigate the trade war challenges, Nigeria must begin to lead conversations around the Africa Growth and Opportunity Act (AGOA).He said the country must explore other multilateral platforms to sustain opportunities.Idahosa stressed that Intra-African trade under the African Continental Free Trade Area (AfCFTA) should be aggressively promoted.He also recommended an urgent review of Nigeria’s national trade policy to reflect emerging global realities.According to him, Nigeria’s trade, tax, and customs regimes must be modernised to align with WTO rules and safeguard Nigerian interests.“We urge the federal government to incentivise local production and value addition in agriculture, mining, and manufacturing.“Exporting commodities in their primary state must give way to processed finished Nigerian goods that command higher global value,” he said.Also, the Bashir Adeniyi Centre for International Trade and Investment (BACITI) of the Nigerian Institute of International Affairs (NIIA) noted that while Africa was not the target of the U.S. tariffs, it was caught in the crossfire.Dr Adesuwa Erediauwa, its Senior Research Fellow, said Africa faced both a challenge and a wake-up call to strengthen regional integration via AfCFTA, diversify exports, and compete globally without reliance on preferential access.She noted that the U.S. tariff would hit Nigeria’s small non-oil export sector hardest as the country’s agricultural and manufacturing MSMEs that had carved out a market in the U.S. now face a price disadvantage.Erediauwa said Nigeria must view the U.S. tariff episode as a catalyst for structural transformation.She added that the country’s long-term economic resilience depends on industrialisation and a strategic shift from raw commodity exports to value added finished goods.“To reduce vulnerability to external shocks, Nigeria must accelerate the diversification of both its economy and export base.“Reducing over-reliance on crude oil is essential for macroeconomic stability and sustainable development.“Priority growth sectors such as agro-processing, solid minerals, digital services, and manufacturing must be scaled through targeted investment, infrastructure development, and supportive policy frameworks,” she said.Though the new U.S. trade tariffs and trade war may seem like a setback, they present a vital opportunity for Nigeria and Africa to reassess, rethink, and strengthen their economic foundations.The Nigerian government must strengthen its support for exporters through loans, tax rebates, financial interventions while it partners relevant agencies to identify new markets.(NAN)OPINION
Tinubu-Buhari Partnership and Opposition’s Desperate Search for Validation

By Tunde Rahman
The special relationship between President Bola Tinubu and former President Muhammadu Buhari has witnessed many remarkable moments. It has experienced dramatic and exciting times, just as there have been challenging moments. Life changing and sweet memories abound between the two great leaders.
Between the two great men, there are recollections of might-have-beens. There are also open testimonies about the gains of the partnership and words of commendation as well as scornful moments.Nonetheless, the two leaders have trudged on to the admiration of their mutual friends and associates, and bewilderment – I dare say, disappointment – of others who would wish both had long parted ways.
About pleasant times, one important moment readily comes to mind. It was towards the end of 2017, two years into the Buhari presidency. The former president was traveling to Abidjan, Cote d’Ivoire, for the 5th African Union-European Union Summit, which took place from November 28th to 30th, and had invited Asiwaju Tinubu to join his entourage. Coming from Buhari, the invitation was a pleasant surprise to the then All Progressives Congress National Leader, given that the administration he worked very hard, with others, to bring into existence, had largely sidelined him after taking over power in 2015. The Cote d’Ivoire invitation, therefore, represented one of the few occasions he would be directly contacted.
As it turned out, taking Tinubu along on that trip proved helpful. Tinubu attended a couple of official meetings and engagements with the former president, including the meeting with the Nigerian Community in Cote d’Ivoire. Buhari alluded to this during that trip.
Speaking about Tinubu, while addressing the Nigerian Community in that country on the sidelines of the summit, the former president had said: “I must thank our Leader, Asiwaju Bola Ahmed Tinubu. He has brought me a very beautiful piece of information, which I was not aware of until I sat down and read it. Thank you very much for your hard work, and I will discuss that paper with you.”
Many were wondering at the time as to what piece of information Tinubu had offered Buhari. But at that time, 2019 was around the corner, and Buhari needed to rally his troops for re-election. There was a need, in my view, to tap Tinubu again for his strategic support and rich political network. Each time Tinubu had any opportunity to visit Buhari at the Presidential Villa, it was to offer ideas and suggestions about the way forward for the government and the country. I know this as a fact because I was always there with him.
Tinubu had helped Buhari to power in 2015 after the General’s three previous unsuccessful attempts. An alliance between Buhari’s Congress for Progressives Change (CPC) and Tinubu’s Action Congress of Nigeria (ACN) that had earlier hit the rocks in 2011 was resuscitated in the run-up to the 2015 election, engendering a working alliance between the North-west and South-west. This was the alliance that put the wind in Buhari’s sail and fired him to the presidency.
For the first time in a long while, the former president recently spoke on this valuable support and fine relationship with Tinubu in a telephone call to the President on his 73rd birthday. According to a statement by his spokesperson, Mallam Garba Shehu, Buhari underscored the bond between him and Tinubu. He disclosed that his family and himself remain indebted to President Tinubu and other APC leaders for the invaluable contributions they made towards the formation of the party, which catapulted him to the presidency for two terms, and helped to produce another APC administration with Tinubu himself at its head.
“No doubt, the annals of the country will not be complete without bringing into mention, and a recognition of the varied and numerous roles of President Tinubu as an entrepreneur, a party stalwart, a staunch activist, party organiser, party builder, a reliable ally and a serial winner of democratic elections. I am truly proud of my association with the Asiwaju,” the former president said.
President Tinubu, on his part, has at every turn extolled the virtues of former President Buhari. For instance, during Buhari’s 82nd birthday last December 17, Tinubu penned a moving tribute to the former president.
He wrote: “Dear President Muhammadu Buhari, on behalf of the government and people of Nigeria, I extend my warmest congratulations and best wishes to you on your 82nd Birthday.
“As you celebrate this remarkable milestone in Daura, we reflect on your years of dedicated service and leadership, which have significantly shaped the course of our nation. Your steadfast commitment to Nigeria’s advancement and unity inspires many, and your enduring legacy continues to guide our nation’s journey towards prosperity and stability.”
Praising Buhari for his doggedness and resilience in contesting presidential elections in 2003, 2007 and 2011 before winning in 2015 and 2019, inspiring “us never to give up,” President Tinubu assured him: “I will continue to build on the infrastructure legacy you bequeathed to our nation as the leader of our country’s first All Progressives Congress administration.”
From the foregoing, notwithstanding the minor strain engineered by some palace courtiers when the former president was in office, it is apparent that the relationship between Tinubu and Buhari continues to flourish as it was built on mutual respect and affection. And like every association, there are bound to be challenges. About that of Buhari and Tinubu, this strain manifested in the sidelining of Asiwaju, particularly during Buhari’s first term in office, and in the orchestrated moves by some people in the Buhari government to thwart Tinubu’s ascension to the presidency in 2023.
However, it would appear that this relationship has weathered the storms. It is waxing stronger. Contrary to the impression in some quarters, particularly in the camps of some opposition politicians, the remarks by the former president during a visit by APC Governors, who paid him Eid-el-Fitri homage in his Kaduna residence, did not in any way undermine the accord. Underlining his cult-like following in the North, the governors had, during the visit, reportedly urged Buhari to dissuade his CPC associates from leaving APC, noting that doing so would strengthen the governing party against the opposition.
During the visit, Buhari had called on political leaders to embrace humility, transparency, and a citizen-first approach to governance, disclosing that he left office with no personal material gain, emphasizing that true leadership is measured not by personal accumulation, but by public service and impact. Garba Shehu again quoted the former president in a statement he issued: “Leaders must always prioritize the welfare of citizens over personal or partisan interests. I left office with the same physical assets I had before becoming President.” Buhari also expressed satisfaction with the renovations to his Kaduna home and thanked the Tinubu administration for the improvements made inside the building. “Outwardly, the house looks the same, but the renovations have been significant,” he said.
However, regarding the APC Governors’ request that he implore his CPC associates not to leave the party, the former president reportedly declined to commit. While reaffirming his loyalty to APC, he was said to have insisted that others must be allowed to make their own political choices. Some analysts and commentators had interpreted that to mean Buhari was pitching his camps with the opposition.
A deeper analysis of Buhari’s politics lends useful perspectives to his convictions as expressed during the visit by the governors elected on the platform of APC. That remark, embodying a laissez faire attitude, is consistent with Buhari’s politics. A vivid example was during the build-up to the 2019 governorship election in Ogun State when as President he appeared in Abeokuta, Ogun State capital, to give the APC flag to Prince Dapo Abiodun, the then candidate of the party for the election. The former president had urged the people of the state to vote for any candidate of their choice. That remark drew flaks from many, but it underscored a principle Buhari has upheld throughout his political career.
It should also be recalled that recently when former Kaduna Governor Nasir el-Rufai defected to the Social Democratic Party and he (el-Rufai) claimed in a BBC Hausa interview that he left the APC with Buhari’s blessings, the former president also used the opportunity to clear the air, insisting he remains fully loyal to the APC and would never abandon the party that made his presidency possible. “I am a proud APC member and I want to always be known as one. I will continue to do everything I can to promote and support the party,” Buhari stated, without directly addressing el-Rufai’s claims.
At the moment, opposition politicians are desperately seeking Buhari’s support and endorsement to validate their 2027 plan. Former Vice President Atiku Abubakar and his cohorts like el-Rufai, former House of Representatives Speaker Aminu Tambuwal and former Governor Bindow Jibrilla of Adamawa State, among others, visited the former president in Kaduna on Thursday to also pay homage to him for the end of Ramadan fasting/Sallah celebrations that occurred two weeks ago.
In all of that and his remarks to the APC Governors that visited him in Kaduna, has former President Buhari, thus far, deviated from or dumped the accord between him and President Tinubu and the spirit of friendship, mutual understanding, cooperation and reciprocal support that underpins their relationship? There is nothing that suggests so. The special relationship between President Tinubu and former President Buhari remains rock solid. The two eminent leaders will continue to cooperate and collaborate to sustain party unity and promote progressive governance.
Rahman is Senior Special Assistant to President Tinubu on Media, Publicity & Special Duties
OPINION
Fake Outrage and the Making of the Uromi 16
By Azu Ishiekwene
It’s a most unlikely crime scene. I travelled by road from the Benin airport to Uromi, Esanland’s most significant town, for a wedding about three years ago.
The fear of kidnappers is a constant worry for road users.
I was nervous for nearly four hours of the taxi ride, especially as we turned off the busy Agbor Road and veered onto narrow, lonely roads meandering through many forested small towns and villages.I was nervous. When the driver ran into a pothole, and a loud noise suggested we might have lost a wheel or something, I insisted he should keep moving, as long as the car could still move, until we later discovered it was the wheel cover.
Entering Uromi
It was not until we passed Ubiaja, the hotspot between Biafran and Federal troops during Nigeria’s civil war and cultural capital of Esanland, and reached Igueben, the rusty town of one of Nigeria’s famous politicians, Tom Ikimi, about 20 minutes’ drive from Uromi, that I started breathing easy. It was my first visit to Uromi, a town I had known and heard about since my teenage years.
Memories from the Past
My earliest memory of this town was when my mother worked as a cook at St. Theresa’s Hospital, Kirikiri Ajegunle, Lagos, owned at the time by Dr. Okoli, an Igbo man, and his wife, a nurse and an Esan from Uromi. Occasionally, when there was some social event in Uromi, the Okolis took my mum along to cook, and she returned with plenty of palm oil, large tubers of yam, and fresh fruits.
But there’s another memory of Uromi apart from my mother’s work and travels. It’s the historical significance of this town in the old Benin Empire. More contemporary references might be about the exploits of some of Uromi’s notable people, such as the three Anthonys – Enahoro, Olubunmi-Okogie and Anenih – whose footprints in politics and liberation theology cannot be easily forgotten.
Innocence Lost to Rage
Yet, these notable persons were inspired by the town’s extraordinary heritage of struggle and resistance to oppression. Uromi resisted the expansionism of the Benin Empire during Oba Ozolua’s reign and fought the British colonial invaders.
Though many of the town’s original settlers are believed to have come from central Nigeria, migrants from other places also settled there, highlighting its tolerance for visitors and diverse heritage as the town grew into one of Esanland’s most important agricultural trading posts.
That diversity, enterprise and welcoming spirit now seem like a story from a bygone era. After the tragic killing of the 16 travellers reportedly going to Kano to observe the Eid on March 28, the town has lost its innocence. For a long time, it will be remembered not as that place my mother frequented as a cook or the homestead of Enahoro, one of Nigeria’s greatest patriots and nationalists, but as a crime scene.
Agony of Bereavement
The heartbreaking story of Hauwa Bala (whose husband, Isah, was among the Uromi 16) who went into premature labour upon hearing of her husband’s tragic death or Sadiya Sa’adu, who lost a brother and a nephew will haunt the community, as will the stories of each of the dead, and indeed the unfolding horror in Uromi now under siege and a brutal crackdown. The security services are poised to forget their complicity and instead crush the town in a mocking search for justice.
Journey to Anomie
How did we get here? Kidnapping and banditry have grown from a fringe business to a N2.23 trillion naira industry, and hardly any part of the country is spared this misery. In the last 10 years, clashes among rival cult gangs have been rife in Edo State, as have been reports of severe violence as a result of farmer-herder clashes. One report said in 2020, Edo was the third most affected by violence in the Niger Delta after Delta and Rivers States.
Violent clashes between farmers and herders have led to significant loss of lives. In February alone, 27 farmers in Edo were reportedly killed by herdsmen. This figure is only a tiny part of the bloody trail that often includes grotesque stories of rape, murder and wantonness wrecking many farming communities across the country as herders roam southwards for pasture.
Politicians’ Fake Outrage
While the affected communities writhe in anguish, official response, especially by politicians and the police, has ranged from chewing the microphone with empty promises of justice to sheer indifference and, in fact, alleged complicity in supplying weapons to the herders in some cases. We’ve seen this repeatedly across the country, from Uromi in Edo to towns in Benue and Plateau States.
When the state, expected to guarantee security and maintain law and order, abdicates its responsibility, turns a blind eye or becomes complicit, people take the law into their own hands. What happened in Uromi on March 28 is one of the tragic outcomes.
The appearance of shock and outrage amongst politicians and the security services is hypocrisy disguised as empathy. They can fool themselves all day long. Unless they begin to rebuild trust in communities and people – whether farmers or herders – can see that there are consequences for breaking the law, Uromi will not be the last tragic crime scene.
Citizens’ Dilemma
Yet, while many communities are under attack, residents are on their own. The Supreme Court recently gave a judgment upholding the death sentence on Citizen Sunday Jackson and criminalising self-defence even in the face of a clear threat to life. The judgment is an absurdity that compounds the dilemma of communities coping with security services often unwilling, unable or unavailable to protect citizens.
If unarmed Jackson had known that self-defence against herdsman Boua Bururo, who stabbed him seven times on his farm, would not avail him, that if he didn’t die by his attacker’s knife, he would have still been killed by the law, he might have surrendered to his attacker. What a fate!
What kind of society gives the victims the short end of the stick? If communities cannot trust that the police can defend them and courts will not provide justice, self-help prevails. As things stand, respect for life and private property rights is endangered, and to pretend otherwise is to enable jungle justice further.
No Excuses
What happened to the Uromi 16 stands condemned, but sadly, the fake outrage by politicians obscures the history behind the tragedy. It neither guarantees that a proper investigation will be done and the perpetrators brought to justice, nor does it assuage current tensions and paranoia in many communities across the country.
Open, unrestrained must stop. The Federal Government must also fast-track community/state policing, which will hopefully use modern surveillance tools and techniques to prevent and fight crime. The current security system is unfit for purpose.
Burden of Kindness
I’m sorry for the truck driver who, after driving past the stranded passengers early on, turned back nearly two kilometres to pick up the Uromi 16 and other stranded passengers from the roadside. Even though he escaped the mob attack in Uromi, he now lives with the guilt of a bloody reward for his act of kindness, the tragic consequence of a society where trust and compassion have declined.
Neither the Uromi I read about in history nor the one my mother visited is the same as the present crime scene. Something is broken, and false outrage won’t fix it.
Azu Ishiekwene is the Editor-in-Chief of Leadership and author of the new book, Writing for Media and Monetising It.