POLITICS
Senate Suspension Row: Akpabio Drags Natasha to Supreme Court
Court documents sighted on Thursday showed that Akpabio filed an application before the apex court to regularise and sustain his appeal challenging decisions of the lower courts on the matter.
The legal battle over the suspension of the senator representing Kogi Central, Natasha Akpoti-Uduaghan, has escalated as the Senate President, Godswill Akpabio, has again approached the Supreme Court.
The documents are marked SC NO: SC/CV/1111/2025.
Appeal No: CA/ABJ/CV/1107/2025. Suit No: FHC/ABJ/CS/384/2025.It partly read, “Motion on Notice brought pursuant to Order 4 Rules 6 & 16 of the Supreme Court 2024 Sections 22, 27 (1) 4, 2 & 4 and 29 of the Supreme Court ACT CAP S.
15 Laws of the Federal Law Section 233 (1) and 3 of the Constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria 1999 (As Amended) and under the inherent jurisdiction of this Honourable Court.”Akpabio is listed as the appellant, while the respondents are Akpoti-Uduaghan, the Clerk of the National Assembly, the Senate of the Federal Republic of Nigeria and the Chairman of the Senate Committee on Ethics, Privileges and Public Petitions, Senator Neda Imasuen.
The dispute arose from a February 2025 plenary session during which Akpoti-Uduaghan raised issues of privilege and alleged procedural breaches.
The matter was referred to the Senate Committee on Ethics, Privileges and Public Petitions, which later recommended her suspension.
Dissatisfied, the lawmaker approached the Federal High Court in Abuja, alleging a breach of her right to a fair hearing and non-compliance with the Senate Standing Orders.
In its judgment on July 4, 2025, the court faulted the suspension, describing it as excessive and unconstitutional.
Following proceedings at the Court of Appeal, Akpabio has now taken the case to the Supreme Court, seeking extension of time to apply for leave to appeal, leave to appeal on grounds of mixed law and fact, and an order deeming his notice of appeal and brief of argument as properly filed.
The former governor argued that the Senate acted within its powers under Section 60 of the 1999 Constitution, which allows the National Assembly to regulate its internal procedures.
Akpabio also contended that the Senate President was not under an obligation to immediately rule on every point of privilege and that the Senate lawfully activated its disciplinary process.
Akpoti-Uduaghan, however, has maintained that her suspension was unlawful and carried out without a fair hearing, insisting that the Senate failed to follow its own rules.
It was confirmed on Thursday that her lawyers had been served with the Supreme Court processes.
The case also involves a related contempt issue arising from a social media post by Akpoti-Uduaghan while the suit was pending. The Federal High Court had fined her and ordered a public apology, a decision she has also appealed.
Legal watchers say the Supreme Court’s decision could clarify the limits of legislative discipline and judicial intervention.
The development comes barely two weeks after Akpabio announced that he had decided to withdraw pending court cases against his adversaries.
Akpoti-Uduaghan resumed duties on September 23, 2025, after completing a six-month suspension and regaining access to her office at the National Assembly.
Her office had been sealed since March 6, 2025, following her suspension over alleged misconduct during a protest against the reassignment of her seat by Akpabio on February 20.
Despite the suspension lapsing in September, she was unable to return immediately due to ongoing legal battles and resistance from the Senate leadership.
Following the July 4 judgment, she notified the Senate of her intention to resume, but the request was initially rejected.
POLITICS
Kaduna Assembly Debunks Report on Alleged Abduction of Lawmaker
The Kaduna State House of Assembly has described as false a report alleging that the member representing Kajuru Constituency, Hon. Usman Stingo, was abducted by suspected terrorists.
The Chairman, House Committee on Information, NGOs and Development Partners, Marah Henry, who made this known in a statement on Thursday, said the report published by an online medium was malicious and fictitious.
Henry said the lawmaker representing Kajuru was safe and currently discharging his official duties.
He added that the individual mentioned in the publication was wrongly identified as a member of the Kaduna State House of Assembly.
According to him, the photograph used in the report does not represent the leadership of the constituency, further indicating the lack of due diligence by the publisher.
“The report is entirely false and a figment of the publisher’s imagination.
“It is a calculated attempt to incite fear, cause public unrest and undermine public trust in the government’s security capacity,” he said.
Henry warned media organisations against disseminating unverified information, stating that the assembly would not hesitate to seek legal redress against individuals or institutions found culpable of spreading defamatory information.
He emphasised that while freedom of the press was constitutionally guaranteed, it should not be used to promote reckless journalism capable of threatening public peace and security.
The committee chairman urged members of the public to disregard the report and remain calm, assuring that the state government remained committed to the safety of lives and property.
He advised the citizens to rely only on official sources for information and avoid sharing unverified reports capable of causing panic.
“The government’s priority remains the peace and stability of Kaduna State,” Henry said.
POLITICS
Kaduna Assembly Debunks Report on Alleged Abduction of Lawmaker
The Kaduna State House of Assembly has described as false a report alleging that the member representing Kajuru Constituency, Hon. Usman Stingo, was abducted by suspected terrorists.
The Chairman, House Committee on Information, NGOs and Development Partners, Marah Henry, who made this known in a statement on Thursday, said the report published by an online medium was malicious and fictitious.
Henry said the lawmaker representing Kajuru was safe and currently discharging his official duties.
He added that the individual mentioned in the publication was wrongly identified as a member of the Kaduna State House of Assembly.
According to him, the photograph used in the report does not represent the leadership of the constituency, further indicating the lack of due diligence by the publisher.
“The report is entirely false and a figment of the publisher’s imagination.
“It is a calculated attempt to incite fear, cause public unrest and undermine public trust in the government’s security capacity,” he said.
Henry warned media organisations against disseminating unverified information, stating that the assembly would not hesitate to seek legal redress against individuals or institutions found culpable of spreading defamatory information.
He emphasised that while freedom of the press was constitutionally guaranteed, it should not be used to promote reckless journalism capable of threatening public peace and security.
The committee chairman urged members of the public to disregard the report and remain calm, assuring that the state government remained committed to the safety of lives and property.
He advised the citizens to rely only on official sources for information and avoid sharing unverified reports capable of causing panic.
“The government’s priority remains the peace and stability of Kaduna State,” Henry said.
POLITICS
Atiku’s Aide Slams Fayose Over Alleged 2027 Horse-trading
By Mike Odiakose, Abuja
Senior Special Assistant on Public Communication to Atiku Abubakar, Phrank Shaibu, has described allegations by former governor Ayo Fayose that Atiku is negotiating with Governor Seyi Makinde to run on joint ticket in 2027 as “Beer parlour tales of infamy.
”Fayose had issued a statement titled “Between Atiku and Makinde, Untold Story of What Happened in Minna Yesterday,” on what he alleged transpired when Atiku and Fayose visited former military president Ibrahim Babangida in Minna Niger State earlier in the week.
Responding to Fayose’s allegation, Shaibu said: “Let it be stated clearly: the entire publication is a shameless concoction — a tissue of lies stitched together by a serial purveyor of political gossip whose relevance survives only on controversy, distortion, and cheap propaganda.
“At no time did former Vice President Atiku Abubakar engage in the imaginary horse-trading described in that laughable script.
“There were no negotiations over vice-presidential tickets. There were no discussions about ₦10 billion contributions. There were no zoning manipulations. There were no delegate-delivery guarantees. And there is certainly no clandestine “Dubai meeting” on any such agenda.
“The attempt to drag other political actors into this fabricated beer parlour tale does not elevate its credibility; it merely exposes the desperation behind it.
“His Excellency Atiku Abubakar’s political engagements are broad-based, principled, and national in scope — not the narrow, transactional theatrics invented in that publication.
“The story is not insider information. It is insider fiction — manufactured to mislead, distract, and provoke.
“It is unfortunate that certain individuals, long deprived of credibility and political gravitas, now attempt to manufacture relevance by inventing tales around serious national figures. Falsehood may trend for a moment, but it collapses under the weight of truth.
“Atiku Abubakar does not transact politics in secrecy, bribery, or transactional desperation as mischievously and irresponsibly portrayed. He remains focused on principled engagement and national redemption — not backroom theatrics designed by attention-seekers.
“We advise the public to treat the publication with the contempt it deserves.”


