JUDICIARY
Presidential Election: Group Kicks Against Inclusion of Nguta, Odili on Supreme Court Panel

By Gabriel Atumeyi
As the Presidential election petition tribunal moves to the supreme court, a civil society organization, Citizens Awareness Against Corruption and Social Vices Initiative has called on Chief Justice of Nigeria, justice Umaru Tanko to resist pressure from any individual and groups in society and put in place a supreme court panel that can discharge justice without fear or favour.
This was made known to newsmen in Abuja on Tuesday, in a statement made available by its Executive Director, Comrade Olumuyiwa Onlede, who disclosed that Justices Nguta and Mary Odili were not worthy to be on the supreme court panel that will oversee the case as they have been indicted for various offences in the past.
“Having watched the happenings surrounding the Presidential election petition tribunal (PEPT) that has shifted to the Supreme Court after the verdict of the Presidential Election Tribunal (PEFT), we deem it necessary and important at this critical time in our nation’s history to lend our voice and to also sound a note of warning against evil plot by enemies of our dear country, these elements are putting pressure on the Chief Justice of Nigeria to advance their greedy, selfish and personal interest to the detriment of the integrity of the judiciary.
“We are advising the Justice Mohammed Tanko, the Chief Justice of Nigeria not to succumb to their empty treat and resist any attempt of constituting a supreme court panel that will be seen as partisan and also seen as lacking in integrity.
“Our finger is pointing at Honourable Justice Nguta and Honourable Justice Mary Odili.
“Our complaints about Justice Nguta , having followed the activities that culminated to the raid on his residence by operatives of Department of State Services (DSS) and subsequent charges against him in the High court. We make bold to say that the decision of the court not to hear the case of a serving judge before disciplinary action by national Judicial Council (NJC) is not in any way enough to exonerate Justice Nguta from any wrong doing and money laundering charge against him considering the highly incriminating local and foreign currencies found in his house during the raid which he never denied.
“Having said this, we make bold to say that a man of this magnitude of accusation hanging on his neck is not fit to sit on the panel of a sensitive case like Presidential Election Tribunal Appeal. So we demand his exemption from the panel regardless his ranking among other supreme court judges.
“Our stand on Honourable Justice Mary Odili is simple as we refer your lordship to what happened between justice Zainab Bulkachuwa and the candidate of the People democratic Party in the 2019 general election where the later protested that Justice Bulkachuwa cannot sit on the Presidential Election Petition Tribunal (PEPT) even as the president of the court of appeal base on the fact that she has an interest in one of the parties involved in the litigation i.e. All Progressive Congress (APC), being the wife of a chieftain of the party and a senator, we totally agree with this assertion in its merit.
“Your lordship Honourable Justice Mary Odili is the wife of the former Governor of Rivers State and a chieftain of People Democratic Party (PDP), and by virtue of this relationship , Justice Mary Odili has an interest in one of the parties involved in the litigation just like Justice Zainab Bulkachuwa the president of the court of appeal that honourably disqualified herself from the Presidential Election Petition Tribunal (PEPT) and saved the integrity of the Panel and judiciary at large.
“We hereby declare Justice Mary Odili as unfit to sit on the supreme court panel on the election tribunal appeal.
Onlede urged Justice Mohammed Tanko to toe the line of honour and integrity and resist any pressure from within and outside the country to include Justice Nguta and Justice Mary Odili in the yet to be constituted presidential tribunal appeal panel as including them in the panel will amount to constituting a panel that lack integrity which will result to mockery of the arm of government call judiciary.
“That Nigerians are eagerly waiting with great interest and will use all legitimate and constitutional means within their right to resist every evil plot to undermine the judiciary,”
JUDICIARY
Alleged breach of Act: MTN CEO, Others Are Evading Service, FCCPC Tells Court

The Federal Competition and Consumer Protection Commission (FCCPC) has told the Federal High Court in Abuja that Mr Karl Toriola, the Managing Director and Chief Executive Officer (MD/CEO) of MTN Nigeria Communications Plc, and others were evading service of court documents on them.
FCCPC, through its lawyer, Nsitem Chizenum, told Justice Hauwa Yilwa upon resumed hearing of the matter on Wednesday.
FCCPC had, in the charge marked: FHC/ABJ/CR/354/2024, dragged the MTN Nigeria Communications Plc; Toriola; Tobechukwu Okigbo, MTN’s Chief Corporate Services and Sustainability Officer, and Ikenna Ikeme, General Manager, Regulatory Affairs of MTN, to court as 1st to 4th defendants respectively.
They were preferred with two counts in the charge, dated July 19, 2024, and filed July 22, 2024 by a team of lawyers led by Akoji Achimugu.
The defendants would be arraigned over alleged failure to produce documents and information required by the commission in compliance with a lawful summons contrary to the FCCPC Act.
The matter was fixed for May 28 for the defendants to take their plea.
When the matter was called on Wednesday, none of the defendants was in court.
The lawyer who appeared for FCCPC, Chizenum, told the judge that it was obvious that the defendants were not in court.
He said on the last adjourned date, the court hinted that it was the duty of the prosecution to bring the defendants to court, hence, efforts were made to produce them in court today.
“We have made several efforts and we equally used the bailiff of this court to serve them but it seems they were evading service my lord,” he said.
The lawyer also told the court that the Nigeria Police Force (NPF) had been involved and that their application was being processed by the NPF with a view to produce the defendants in court.
“In the circumstance, we ask for an adjournment to enable us bring the defendants for arraignment my lord,” he said.
Justice Yilwa subsequently adjourned the until Sept. 25 for arraignment.
In count one, the MTN Nigeria Communications PLC, Toriola, Okigbo and Ikeme were alleged to have on or about June 18, 2024 did without sufficient cause failed to produce documents and or information which they were required to produce, “in compliance with a lawful Summons and Request to Produce dated May 17, 2024.”
The commission alleged that the compliance with same summon was further extended by a letter dated June 5, 2024 and they thereby committed an offence contrary to and punishable under Section 33 (3) of the Federal Competition and Consumer Protection Act, 2018.
In count two, the defendants were alleged to have “on or about June 18, 2024, in furtherance, and continuation of extant refusal to produce documents and supply information required by the commission under statutory notice and demand, did impede and obstruct the FCCPC’s ongoing limited initial inquiry and possible prospective investigation by refusing to produce and supply documents and or information” requested.
The offence is said to be contrary to Section 111 (1) of the FCCP Act, 2018, and punishable under Section 111 (2) of the same act.
The Nigerian Copyright Commission (NCC) had, in another matter, filed charge against MTN Nigeria Communications Ltd; its CEO, Toriola; MTN Senior Executive Officer, Nkeakam Abhulimen; Fun Mobile Ltd, a telecommunications service provider; and Yahaya Maibe, its CEO.
The NCC, in the three-count charge marked: FHC/ABJ/CR/111/2024 presently before Justice Inyang Ekwo of a sister court, filed it on March 20, 2024.
The prosecution had alleged that the defendants, between 2010 and 2017, “offered for sale, sold and traded for business, infringed musical works of Maleke Moye, an artiste, without his consent and authorisation.”
The commission alleged that the defendants used Maleke’s musical works and sound recordings with subsisting copyright, known as “caller ring back tunes” without the authorization of the artiste, among others.
The copyright commission said the alleged offence is punishable under Section 20 (2) (a) (b) and (c) of the Copyright Act, Cap. C28, Laws of the Federation of Nigeria, 2004.
Justice Ekwo had, on Feb. 25, adjourned the matter until May 15 for report, following the Attorney-General of the Federation (AGF)’s interest to take over the case.
However, the matter could not proceed on May 15 because the court did not sit.(NAN)
CRIME
Travel Agent Jailed 4 Years Over N6.2m Visa Fraud

A Kaduna Magistrates’ Court on Wednesday sentenced a 39-year-old travel agent, Adebayo Oyeronke, to four years imprisonment over a N6.2 million visa fraud.
Oyeronke had pleaded guilty to the charges of fraud and theft.
Delivering judgment, Magistrate Ibrahim Emmanuel, held that Oyeronke was guilty of defrauding Rita Francis and four others of the sum of N6.
2 million.Emmanuel who did not give the convict an option of fine, ordered him to pay N2 million each as compensation to the victims.
The magistrate also ordered him to undertake an affidavit of good conduct, pledging never to engage in any criminal or corrupt activities again.
Earlier, the prosecution Insp.
Chidi Leo told the court that the convict committed the offences between December 2024 and April 2025 at Barnawa Kaduna.Leo said that the defendant collected N6.2 million from the complainants; Rita Francis, Mohammed Sadiq, Christian Baba, Williams Abiodun and Nathan Victor, with a promise to get them Polish visa.
He said after the convict collected the money, he absconded to an unknown destination until he was arrested on May 15.
The prosecutor said the offences contravened the Penal Code of Kaduna State, 2017. (NAN)
CRIME
Woman, 31, Docked Over Alleged Theft of iPhone Worth N500,000

A 31-year-old woman, Opeyemi Bakare, on Tuesday appeared before an Iyaganku Chief Magistrates’ Court for allegedly stealing an iPhone valued at N500,000.
Bakare, of undisclosed address, was charged with two counts of conspiracy and stealing .
The prosecutor, Insp Iyabo Oladoyin, told the court that the defendant and others at large conspired and committed the offences on May 2 at 3.
30 p. m. in the Dugbe area of Ibadan.According to Oladoyin, the defendant stole an iPhone 12 valued at N505,000, belonging to the complainant, Mr Oluseyi Oba.
The prosecutor said the phone was stolen in Dugbe Market and was tracked to the defendant.
She said the offences contravened Sections 390 (9) and 516 of the Criminal Code, Laws of Oyo State, 2000.
The defendant pleaded not guilty to the charge.
The Magistrate, Mrs T.G. Daodu, admitted the defendant to bail in the sum of one million naira with two sureties in like sum.
Daodu thereafter adjourned the case until July 8 for hearing. (NAN)
A 31-year-old woman, Opeyemi Bakare, on Tuesday appeared before an Iyaganku Chief Magistrates’ Court for allegedly stealing an iPhone valued at N500,000.
Bakare, of undisclosed address, was charged with two counts of conspiracy and stealing .
The prosecutor, Insp Iyabo Oladoyin, told the court that the defendant and others at large conspired and committed the offences on May 2 at 3.30 p.m. in the Dugbe area of Ibadan.
According to Oladoyin, the defendant stole an iPhone 12 valued at N505,000, belonging to the complainant, Mr Oluseyi Oba.
The prosecutor said the phone was stolen in Dugbe Market and was tracked to the defendant.
She said the offences contravened Sections 390 (9) and 516 of the Criminal Code, Laws of Oyo State, 2000.
The defendant pleaded not guilty to the charge.
The Magistrate, Mrs T.G. Daodu, admitted the defendant to bail in the sum of one million naira with two sureties in like sum.
Daodu thereafter adjourned the case until July 8 for hearing. (NAN)