POLITICS
SAN Canvasses Supreme Court as Final Determiner of House of Assembly Election Petitions

A Senior Advocate of Nigeria (SAN), Mr Olalekan Ojo, has called for an amendment to the law empowering the Court of Appeal as the final determiner of House of Assembly election petitions.
Ojo, in an interview with newsmen in Ibadan on Sunday, suggested that such powers should be invested in the Supreme Court.
Reports says that the constitutional lawyer spoke against the sacking of the 16 members of the assembly elected on the platform of Peoples Democratic Party (PDP) by the appellate court, which deemed their party primaries defective.
However, the supreme court declared Gov. Caleb Mutfwang, the PDP candidate, as the true winner of the 2023 governorship election in the state.
Reports says that the development has generated tension, with the aggrieved sacked lawmakers seeing the court of appeal judgment as a miscarriage of justice and attempting to forcibly resume duties at the assembly.
Ojo, who described the case of the PDP lawmakers as a ‘remediless injury’, said that the situation had called for the need to empower supreme court to be the final determiner of house of assembly election petitions.
This, he said, had become necessary in order to guard against this kind of logjam.
“It is better not to allow the supreme court to be the final court to determine house of assembly election petitions because of situations like this.
“No matter how unpalatable the decision of the appeal court may be, it is the final determiner of house of assembly election petitions.
“Unfortunately, the house of assembly members who were sacked don’t have the law on their side because there is no right of further appeal for them.
“There is a popular saying that where there is any wrong or injury, there is a remedy.
“But what is happening in Plateau is an exception to that saying, as the constitution says that they don’t have a right of further appeal.
“This is one of the reasons the appeal court’s decisions should not be the final in any case because the sacked lawmakers would have appealed the judgment if there has been such an opportunity.
“Their case is like appealing against the pronouncement of the supreme court; it cannot stand,” he said.
The legal expert, however, advised the sacked lawmakers not to resort to use of force in achieving their aim.
“The situation in which they have found themselves is a remediless injury and it is a pity.
“I think that they should rather appeal to their governor to compensate them with some other things,” he said.
In his own view, a professor of African History at the University of Ibadan, Isaac Albert, expressed sadness that judicial pronouncements, especially on electoral matters, were usually characterised by confusions and bitter memories in Nigeria.
“It is obvious that the judgment of the appeal court on the house of assembly members is wrong, but unfortunately, nobody has any solution to it.
“I think the judiciary is not helping in the consolidation of democracy in Nigeria, judging from the series of conflicting decisions made by them.
This, according to Albert, is why Nigerians are calling for judicial reforms to enhance the restoration of the institutional credibility of the judiciary.
“Also, there is the need to address the procedural credibility in the judicial system.
“There is equally the issue of personal credibility among the judges.
“All these, if addressed, will enable Nigerians to respect and trust the judiciary.
“The National Judicial Council (NJC) surely has a long way to go in managing the personal credibility of many of its members,” the don said. (NAN)
POLITICS
There Was Never a Peace Accord Between Gov Fubara, Wike – Former APC Chieftain Jackson Ojo

By Mike Odiakose, Abuja
A former Chieftain of the All Progressives Congress (APC), Dr Jackson Lekan Ojo, has dispelled speculations that there is a peace deal between Rivers State Governor Simi Fubara and FCT Minister, Nyesom Wike.Jackson Ojo declared on Sunday that instead of a peace accord, what is presently on ground is akin to a political surrender agreement that will render the governor totally impotent politically.
According to him, all items on the agreement are one sided in favour of Wike who was on the negotiation table with his team whereas Governor Fubara was there without any supporter. He declared that Governor Fubara was overwhelmed and tired of the whole issue and simply surrendered to Wike.”I wonder why some people say there was a peace accord between Governor Simi Fubara and Nyesom Wike. There was never a peace accord between Wike and Simi. What we saw was Simi surrendered. “When you are talking about peace accord, let me go this way. Two communities are fighting and people say we want to settle it. What do you expect. You expect the King and the Council of Chiefs from community A and the King and Council of Chiefs from community B, they will talk and arrive at conclusion. “They will now work on that conclusion when they must have struck a balance.”But what happened between these people (Wike and Fubara)? It was Wike and his people. Fubara went there alone without any of his supporters. At the end of the day what happened?”Part of the condition is that out of 23 local government Chairmen we are going to select all 23; the already had members of the State House of Assembly, the Chief of Staff to the Governor could no longer come closer to the government again, your Secretary to the State Government can no longer come to the government again, there are some selected local government Chairmen that must not come to the government again. At the end of the day somebody agreed that you not run for another election again. They say that is a peace accord.”When they finished it they went to Mr President in the Villa for Mr President to affirm it. Is that a peace accord? That was not a peace accord.”I think Simi was tired of it and he surrendered without the consent of the people.”He chided Governor Simi for succumbing to all the demands of Wike, including the unceremonious dissolution of his grassroot support team, the Simplified Movement.”At the end of the day when they returned what did Simi say? He gathered his Simplified Movement and discouraged them. Those that printed solidarity caps, and other materials for 2027 he warned them that he didn’t send anybody.”Again, he dissolved the Simplified Movement, his political movement whereas the Zikist Movement of the early 1960s is still alive. The Awoist is still alive; the Ahmadu Bello is still alive; the People’s Redemption Movement is still alive. What are we talking about?”Wike’s Grassroot Movement is still alive but you went and dissolved your own movement. Today Governor Simi does not have any alternative political platform. “Today if he comes back he may not have any commissioner nominated by him, he might not have a single councillor loyal to him, today if he comes back he won’t have a single member of the State House of Assembly loyal to him.”Is that what you call peace accord? No.”Somebody has submitted to superior political firepower. “If a sitting governor was conquered with all the paraphernalia of office, with all the economic power, with all the financial and political muscles, and other things; if somebody outside the power in the State is able to suppress the governor who is there to challenge that authority?”It will remain like that till thy kingdom comes. That is my prediction.”POLITICS
There Was Never a Peace Accord Between Gov Fubara, Wike – Former APC Chieftain Jackson Ojo

By Mike Odiakose, Abuja
A former Chieftain of the All Progressives Congress (APC), Dr Jackson Lekan Ojo, has dispelled speculations that there is a peace deal between Rivers State Governor Simi Fubara and FCT Minister, Nyesom Wike.
Jackson Ojo declared on Sunday that instead of a peace accord, what is presently on ground is akin to a political surrender agreement that will render the governor totally impotent politically.
According to him, all items on the agreement are one sided in favour of Wike who was on the negotiation table with his team whereas Governor Fubara was there without any supporter.
He declared that Governor Fubara was overwhelmed and tired of the whole issue and simply surrendered to Wike.
“I wonder why some people say there was a peace accord between Governor Simi Fubara and Nyesom Wike. There was never a peace accord between Wike and Simi. What we saw was Simi surrendered.
“When you are talking about peace accord, let me go this way. Two communities are fighting and people say we want to settle it. What do you expect. You expect the King and the Council of Chiefs from community A and the King and Council of Chiefs from community B, they will talk and arrive at conclusion.
“They will now work on that conclusion when they must have struck a balance.
“But what happened between these people (Wike and Fubara)? It was Wike and his people. Fubara went there alone without any of his supporters. At the end of the day what happened?
“Part of the condition is that out of 23 local government Chairmen we are going to select all 23; the already had members of the State House of Assembly, the Chief of Staff to the Governor could no longer come closer to the government again, your Secretary to the State Government can no longer come to the government again, there are some selected local government Chairmen that must not come to the government again. At the end of the day somebody agreed that you not run for another election again. They say that is a peace accord.
“When they finished it they went to Mr President in the Villa for Mr President to affirm it. Is that a peace accord? That was not a peace accord.
“I think Simi was tired of it and he surrendered without the consent of the people.”
He chided Governor Simi for succumbing to all the demands of Wike, including the unceremonious dissolution of his grassroot support team, the Simplified Movement.
“At the end of the day when they returned what did Simi say? He gathered his Simplified Movement and discouraged them. Those that printed solidarity caps, and other materials for 2027 he warned them that he didn’t send anybody.
“Again, he dissolved the Simplified Movement, his political movement whereas the Zikist Movement of the early 1960s is still alive. The Awoist is still alive; the Ahmadu Bello is still alive; the People’s Redemption Movement is still alive. What are we talking about?
“Wike’s Grassroot Movement is still alive but you went and dissolved your own movement. Today Governor Simi does not have any alternative political platform.
“Today if he comes back he may not have any commissioner nominated by him, he might not have a single councillor loyal to him, today if he comes back he won’t have a single member of the State House of Assembly loyal to him.
“Is that what you call peace accord? No.
“Somebody has submitted to superior political firepower.
“If a sitting governor was conquered with all the paraphernalia of office, with all the economic power, with all the financial and political muscles, and other things; if somebody outside the power in the State is able to suppress the governor who is there to challenge that authority?
“It will remain like that till thy kingdom comes. That is my prediction.”
End
POLITICS
Obi Personally Funded His 2023 Presidential Campaign — Ex-LP Treasurer

The former National Treasurer of the Labour Party LP), Oluchi Oparah, dismissed allegations that former Anambra State governor, Peter Obi, misused party funds during his 2023 presidential campaign.
Oparah stated that Peter Obi personally funded his campaign activities and also made financial contributions to the party.
She stated that Obi not only financed his own campaign activities but also played a key role in stabilising the party’s finances upon joining.
“There was nothing of such. Mr. Obi never spent any money meant for the party,” Oparah said on Channels Television’s The Morning Brief, when asked to react to the allegation by a chieftain of the LP, Abayomi Arabambi, that Obi spent party funds on his campaign.
“In fact, he lifted the party from zero level to where it is today,” she added.
She disclosed that before Obi joined the Labour Party, it was deeply in debt and struggled to pay its staff salaries.
She noted that Obi fulfilled all the financial obligations expected of him and went further to donate to the party from his personal resources.
“Mr. Obi fulfilled every righteousness financially towards the Labour Party. There was never a time he asked for a dime from the party, unlike other political parties will do,” she stated.
She also explained the campaign financing structure, stating that each candidate was permitted to operate a separate campaign account, independent of the party’s official accounts.
She explained that the Labour Party also maintained its financial accounts for party activities.
“He spent a lot of money on the Labour Party. We have programmes that Mr. Obi solely financed by himself. Obi spent from his money because the Labour Party did not have a dime,” Oparah said during the interview.
She also condemned what she termed the lack of accountability in the current APC-led administration and called on Nigerians to concentrate on holding the ruling party accountable instead of targeting Peter Obi.
She also challenged those accusing Obi of financial misconduct to come forward with proof of the payments they claim to have made to the Labour Party.
“As far as I am concerned, Mr. Obi was the only person who showed interest in contesting on the platform of the Labour Party.
“So, anyone claiming whatsoever should come out to show us the particular account to which they paid whatever thing they say they paid to the Labour Party,” she maintained.
Oparah praised Obi’s charitable nature, describing his charitable activities as a consistent trait long before his time as a presidential candidate, adding, “Anyone that knows Mr. Obi very well knows that his act of charity is five and six, like the air he breathes.”
End