POLITICS
Kanu Arrest: Time to Arrest what Gives Rise to Agitations
By Jude Opara
In past few days, the biggest story that has been coming out of Nigeria is the arrest of the leader of the separatist Indigenous People of Biafra (IPOB), Mazi Nnamdi Kanu by Nigerian security agencies. In fact it was almost like a funfair watching the Minister of Justice and Attorney General of the Federation (AGF), Abubakar Malami addressing the media to reveal the arrest.
Shortly after that the Minister of Information and Culture, Lai Mohammed did not want to miss out of the euphoria as he also addressed the media.
Mohammed almost got personal while describing the life style Kanu was leaving, even the type of cloths he was wearing.Elsewhere all manner of conjectures from the absurd to the ridiculous were made as to where and how he was arrested.
The ever busy social media was awash with all kinds of reactions. While some segments of the society were in a sober mood over the arrest, others were in jubilant celebrations.The Arewa Youth Consultative Forum (AYCF) expectedly jumped into the matter by issuing a statement in celebration of the arrest. Understandably, this was after the same group and other numerous Northern groups jointly placed a N100 million Naira bounty on the head of Kanu.
However, beyond the feeling or reaction of some individuals or groups concerning the arrest of Kanu, the most important question to ask is after the re-arrest of Kanu, what next? Is it now Eldorado for Nigeria? Will the arrest of Kanu bring an end to the numerous challenges facing the country?
It must be stated here that while it is true that most of the people of the South-East are not in support with the style of Kanu and his IPOB, there are some salient realities that must not be ignored.
Number one is that Kanu has managed to attract a large followership of people especially the youths to himself. Today he has a cult figure among the adherents to his message and style.
Secondly, we must separate the fiction from the reality that beyond the propaganda and blackmail aimed at tarnishing the image of Kanu, we must accept the fact that his claim of marginalization of the people of the South East is staring us in the face every day.
Now what has given a fellow like Nnamdi Kanu who was barely known about seven years ago such an international image he has today was the apparent mishandling of the IPOB agitation by the federal government who decided to use the force of arms instead of the more profitable use of dialogue.
Whether we as a people accept it or not, there is an overwhelming belief in the South-East that successive governments have treated them with little or no regard. Over the years the area has been complaining of being marginalized.
The people will without blinking an eye reel out series of reasons why they believe they are being marginalized by the government. For instance, they will tell you that of the six regions in Nigeria, the South-East is the only one with only five states while others have six and North-West has seven. They will readily tell you that the zone has only 95 local government areas while one state elsewhere has 44 local government areas. They will easily point out to the fact their children are the ones that must score higher marks before they could get admission into colleges and universities.
For instance, currently at the University of Abuja there is a silent war going on with the systematic weeding of students from some part of the country. This writer knows the case of a boy from Imo State who wants to study International Studies/Political Science, he scored 276 in the UTME but so far he has not been offered admission while there are some with as low as 180 from other parts of the country who have been offered admission. In the school, it is widely said that the Vice Chancellor says he wants to ensure that more students from a particular religion and parts of the country were admitted. If this fails to get admission not because he did not do well but on the basis of his tribe and religion, does anybody need to tell him that he is not wanted in Nigeria?
In fact, most analysts have blamed the IPOB issue and its apparent mishandling on the same wave of marginalization because before IPOB, we have the killer herdsmen freely attacking and sacking communities across Nigerian and till date the Nigerian government has refused to classify them as terrorists, despite the fact that in the Global Terrorism Index (GTI), the Fulani herdsmen are the fourth most deadly terrorist organization in the world.
But the same government in their thinking thought that rushing to brand IPOB a terrorist organization was the best way to tackle the issue of the agitation for the restoration of the State of Biafra.
How far has successive Nigerian governments gone to really unite the country since after the civil war? Till date the average Igbo man rightly or wrongly believes that while the physical war of bullets and bombs may have ended, the cold war is still very much raging.
The arrest of Nnamdi Kanu will achieve little or nothing unless the government begins an earnest move to truly integrate the people of South-East into the Nigerian system. The usual talks of the zone also having cabinet ministers are hollow statements that only attempt without success to confuse the question.
Biafra is an ideology and the world over; ideologies are never defeated with the force of arms, only superior arguments can defeat ideologies. It is rather regrettable that instead of using dialogue and the suggestion of superior arguments to those who believe they should exit Nigeria, the federal government only knows how to threaten and attack.
The poser here is if after more than 50 years since the civil war ended and today millions of youths from the South-East are again clamouring for the restoration of Biafra, it means that certain things may not have been seen to have been done correctly. Therefore, the only reasonable thing the federal government ought o have done is to call those claiming to be marginalized was to have invited them to a dialogue and hear them out.
The truth is, even if the government eliminates or incarcerates Kanu forever but fails to address the issues that threw him up; it is only a matter of time before another person will emerge to continue with the agitation. The Nigerian government should rather show leadership by engaging the Igbo people to find out how they are truly marginalized. Waving them aside with the hope of clamping down on them cannot and will never solve the problem.
Those who are in charge of the affairs of the country today should know that power is transient; they should also know that they cannot continue to hold people down and expect them to remain quiet forever. The irrational impression that some Nigerians are more important than others just on the basis of their religion and ethnicity can never suffice because generations to come will surely ask questions that may not be palatable.
Since the arrest of Nnamdi Kanu, it has been observed how most of those making some comments to suggest that Kanu must be punished like a ‘terrorist’ are from Northern part of the country. Despite the fact the region is the hotbed of banditry and kidnapping, especially of little school children, most of these elements have not exhibited such interest in the arrest of Kanu in calling on the federal government to also arrest those terrorizing their region. In fact, some Northern governments have confessed to going to pay money to the bandits to stop harassing their people but till date everybody pretends not o know who after the bandits and where they could be located.
While it must be stated that Kanu while on his self-imposed exile made some incendiary comments that were capable of leading to the breakdown of law and order, it is not for people and even government officials from a particular section of the country to more or less take it personal. That will also suggest that he may not be accorded him fundamental human right which presumes him innocent until proven otherwise by a competent Court. In fact most of them have inadvertently condemned him and it is only imaginable what to expect from the Court.
The way out of this dangerous situation is for the President Muhammadu Buhari administration to sincerely begin the process of restructuring Nigeria so that most of the agitations would be taken care of. Refusing and insisting on the apparent lopsided structure will not do anybody any good.
So whatever happens, the problem will not just disappear because Nnamdi Kanu has been arrested. We must begin and out in place structures that will help the real growth of the country.
POLITICS
Obi, TCM Condemn Tinubu’s Distribution of Vehicles to Renewed Hope Ambassadors
By Mike Odiakose Abuja
Presidential Candidate of the Labour Party, Peter Obi and a socio-political organisation, The Collective Movement (TCM), have strongly condemned the recent revelation that President Bola Tinubu has started distributing vehicles to state coordinators of a political structure otherwise known as Renewed Hope Ambassadors, apparently as part of an early push for the 2027 elections.
In a post on his verified X handle on Thursday, Obi said at a time when Nigerians are struggling with hunger, unemployment and insecurity, the decision of the government to allocate limited public resources for distribution of luxury vehicles like Hilux trucks and Hummer buses as part of the 2027 campaign mobilisation is not only insensitive but also represents a serious moral failure.
The former Anambra State governor said while ordinary Nigerians are grappling with poverty and hopelessness, those in leadership positions continue to flaunt their wealth by driving brand-new luxury vehicles, treating the suffering of the people as mere background for political theatrics.
According to him, leadership should focus on providing food for the hungry, ensuring access to healthcare for the sick, restoring hope for millions of unemployed youth, and securing the communities.
He stressed that it should not be about parading luxury vehicles or campaigning for votes.
“It is disheartening that, at a time when children are dropping out of school because their families cannot afford tuition fees, when mothers are dying during childbirth due to a lack of basic medical supplies, and when insecurity is tearing families apart, the response from those in power is to purchase and distribute luxury vehicles rather than urgently addressing the needs of the people.
“This is not governance. It reflects a profound insensitivity and an abuse of public trust disguised as a political strategy. It betrays the essence of public service, which should always be about serving the people rather than staging political publicity.
“At times like this, we must recognise that Nigeria cannot continue on a path of wastefulness, insensitivity, and misplaced priorities.
“Our citizens deserve leadership grounded in empathy, prudence, and accountability. Regardless of how bleak the situation may appear today, I firmly believe that a New Nigeria is not only necessary,” Obi wrote.
In his own reaction, TCM’s founder, High Chief Franklin Ekechukwu, in a press release on Thursday, described the move as nothing short of a scandalous betrayal of public trust.
The vehicles range from brand-new Toyota Hilux trucks, Hummer buses, and Land Cruiser jeeps.
Each of the 36 states and the Federal Capital Territory reportedly received these luxury vehicles; coordinators were simultaneously instructed to raise one billion naira each for campaign logistics. This raises urgent questions: From which coffers is this extravagance being funded? And at what cost to millions of suffering Nigerians?
He noted that the timing of this lavish distribution is not only tone-deaf but deeply disturbing. While terrorists roam freely, kidnappings escalate, communities are displaced, and Nigerians live in daily fear, the administration appears more focused on assembling campaign convoys than implementing urgent security reforms.
According to him, it is morally repugnant to prioritise political power over the lives and safety of citizens. The decision reeks of contempt for ordinary Nigerians, those whose children are abducted, whose homes are attacked, whose futures remain uncertain.
Ekechukwu added, “In 2025, what Nigeria desperately needs is a government that prioritises human lives. We need well-funded security architecture, community policing, strengthened intelligence systems, and reforms that protect lives and restore public confidence.
POLITICS
Musa Takes Oath, Vows United Front against Insecurity
By David Torough, Abuja
President Bola Tinubu yesterday swore in former Chief of Defense Staff, General Christopher Musa (rtd), as Nigeria’s new Minister of Defence, just as he transmitted an additional list of ambassadorial nominees to the Senate for screening.
Musa took the oath of office at the State House in Abuja.
His appointment follows the resignation of Mohammed Badaru Abubakar on health grounds, prompting the President to forward Musa’s nomination to the Senate earlier in the week.During his screening on Wednesday, the former CDS assured lawmakers that Nigeria has the capacity to defeat insurgency, banditry, and kidnapping—provided there is unified national cooperation and adequate deployment of troops and technology.
He stressed that state governors and high-level political leaders must work more closely with the Armed Forces to close operational gaps.“We can win this war, but we have to work together,” he told senators, adding that he would review all existing security strategies and investigate alleged lapses, including reports of troop withdrawal from a Kebbi school shortly before terrorists abducted 24 schoolgirls two weeks ago.
Meanwhile, Tinubu has submitted more names to the list of ambassadorial nominees, expanding the pool of non-career diplomats awaiting confirmation. Among the new nominees are former Naval Chief Ibok-Ete Ekwe Ibas; former Senator Ita Enang; former Imo First Lady Chioma Ohakim; and former Minister of Interior and ex–Army Chief Abdulrahman Dambazau.
Their names were read on the floor by Senate President Godswill Akpabio during Thursday’s plenary and subsequently referred to the Senate Committee on Foreign Affairs for screening within one week. This follows an earlier batch of nominees including Reno Omokri, Femi Fani-Kayode and immediate past INEC chairman, Mahmood Yakubu.
Tinubu urged the Senate to expedite the confirmation process to ensure that Nigeria’s diplomatic missions are promptly staffed and fully functional.
| ReplyReply allForwardAdd reaction |
POLITICS
Reps Accuse DisCos of Crippling Nations’ Power Supply System
By Ubong Ukpong, Abuja
The House of Representatives on Wednesday, accused the electricity Distribution Companies (DisCos) in the country, of crippling the nation’s electricity supply system.
The House Ad hoc Committee investigating Nigeria’s power sector reforms and expenditure from 2007 to 2024, said that the DisCos wallowed in years of poor investment, inadequate expansion, and failure to meet obligations outlined in their original business plans.
Speaking during an investigative hearing, Chairman of the committee, Arch. Ibrahim Almustapha Aliyu, said most distribution companies had misled the government at the point of acquisition, presenting impressive business plans but failing to deploy the required resources to upgrade substations, transformers, and distribution networks more than a decade after privatization.
He expressed shock that despite claims by the Transmission Company of Nigeria (TCN) that it can wheel up to 8,000 megawatts, the DisCos continue to take only about 4,000 megawatts due to limited infrastructure, a problem he said is self-inflicted.
According to him, the power distribution firms have “refused to invest, refused to expand, and refused franchising options,” thereby creating the conditions for energy theft, meter bypassing, and consumer apathy across the country.
“You have caused this problem because you could not expand from what you inherited,” he said. “For 13 to 14 years now, if you had made the necessary investments, substations, up-to-date transformers, proper network expansion, there would be no issue. You would uptake more energy, the cost would be lower, and Nigerians would be happy.”
He noted that many consumers resort to illegal connections because they are billed monthly for electricity that is either not supplied or grossly inadequate.
“How do you expect someone whose monthly bill equals his salary to keep paying? People will look for alternatives. And your refusal to invest has contributed to this unholy attitude of bypassing and stealing energy,” he said.
The committee chairman reminded the DisCos that Nigerians enjoyed better supply under the defunct NEPA/NITEL-era systems in some areas, and expected significant improvements after private investors took over the assets.
He further challenged the DisCos to reconcile their earlier claims of competence and financial capacity with their current inability to meet tariff obligations, network expansion expectations, and service delivery benchmarks.
Chief Regulatory and Compliance Officer of Kaduna Electric, Dr. Mahmood Abubakar said about 60 percent of electricity supplied nationwide is subsidised, a situation the company said has continued to weaken investor confidence and limit the ability of distribution companies (DisCos) to make the necessary capital investments.
He said during the hearing that only about 40 percent of electricity, largely consumed by Band A customers, is cost-reflective, while the rest depends heavily on government subsidies that are often delayed or unpaid.
According to him, the current subsidy structure distorts billing, revenue collection, and the ability of DisCos to expand infrastructure more than a decade after privatisation.
“If we go strictly by the multi-year tariff order, about 60 percent of the energy consumed in Nigeria is subsidised by the government. Only Band A pays the reflective tariff. Even then, we have Band A feeders recording up to 80 percent energy losses due to theft and bypasses, making full recovery impossible,” he said.
Abubakar explained that because DisCos cannot recover their full revenue requirement, they cannot secure investments or loans needed to upgrade their networks.
He added that the delay in the payment of subsidies affects the entire value chain, particularly affecting generation companies’ ability to pay for gas, thereby affecting power production.
“The subsidy is not forthcoming as and when due. It comes whenever the government decides to pay. That is the reality, and it affects everyone. We cannot pay our market invoices fully, the Gencos cannot fulfil firm contracts with gas suppliers, and the whole chain is weakened,” he said.

