Connect with us

POLITICS

The Senate Rules and Natasha’s Outburst: Facts of the Matter

Published

on

Share

By Ola Awoniyi

A drama on the floor of the Senate on Thursday, 20th February 2025, attracted varied commentaries on the social, print and broadcast media. The drama was both unnecessary and avoidable as it merely distracted from the business of the day in the Chamber.

Legislative activities, whether in the hallowed Chamber or in committee rooms, are guided by the Senate Rules.

This may lead a first-timer at the public gallery to wonder if lawmakers do anything without reference to their Standing Rules. Every time they get the recognition of the Presiding Officer to contribute to a discussion in the chamber, Senators are guided by the Standing Rules in what to say.
This is well known to the lawmakers. The Rules also stipulate sanctions for members whose actions or conducts deviate from the Rules. The Chamber is called hallowed because it is known for Order and decorum. 

The drama of that Thursday started right at the commencement of the day’s business when the Senate Chief Whip, Senator Mohammed Tahir Monguno, raised a Point of Order to report Senator Natasha Akpoti-Uduaghan, representing Kogi Central, to the Senate on her disregard for the Senate Rules. Order 6, which Senator Monguno cited, stipulates that “the President of the Senate shall allocate a seat to each senator,” while section 6(2) states that senators may only speak from the seat allocated to them by the Presiding Officer. It also provides that the President of the Senate may change the allocation from time to time as the need arises.

Senator Monguno, relying on the rules stated above, submitted that “It is at the discretion of the Senate president, as circumstances may warrant, to change the seat of any Senator, based on circumstances that may crop up in the course of proceedings in the Senate.

“In the course of proceedings, two Senators – Ned Nwoko of the PDP and Senator Francis Ezenwa of the Labour Party, decamped to the APC, thereby necessitating their movement from the other side (Minority) to this side (Majority). In the exercise of the powers conferred on the President of the Senate, pursuant to Order 6(2), the President of the Senate decided to rearrange things, giving a directive to the Chief Whip to exercise that function. And pursuant to that directive, seats were reallocated and I want to report that Senator Natasha, having been given another seat, refused to vacate her former seat in flagrant violation of our Rules.”

Senator Monguno consequently referred the Senate to the Standing Rules, which mandate Senator Natasha to comply with the directive of the Presiding Officer to move to her new seat, failure of which she would be denied recognition to make any contribution during plenary. 

After the Chief Whip landed on his Point of Order, the Senate President hit the gavel and pronounced that the Point of Order was sustained. This means that Senator Natasha could not speak on the floor of the Senate except from the new seat allocated to her.

Upon the Senate President’s ruling on the Point of Order, Senator Natasha sprang to her feet, waving the same document containing the Standing Rules and shouting, “Point of Order.” However, the Senate President reminded her that she could not speak outside her allocated seat. 

Senator Natasha ignored the Presiding Officer’s ruling and continued to scream, citing Order 10, which has to do with the breach of privileges of a Senator.

Because she continued to scream, the Senate President ordered the Seargent-At-Arms to “take her out of the Chamber.” The Seargent-At-Arms moved swiftly in her direction but hesitated to act, probably expecting the Senator to calm down and comply with the Senate President’s ruling and avert her evacuation from the Chamber. However, the Senate President kept a dignified silence. He did not repeat his directive, obviously to avert aggravating the drama.

By this time, some Senators had walked over to pet Senator Natasha, but she rebuffed their intervention and continued uttering discourteous statements.

Against the backdrop of the unfortunate drama, commentators have raised some questions: Why should the Senate President reallocate Senators’ seats? Why can’t Senators speak from any seat in the Chamber? Why wasn’t Senator Natasha allowed to explain her objection to her seat being changed?

A reference was also made to an incident on 17th October 2018 when Senator Godswill Akpabio protested being denied recognition to speak from a seat other than the one allocated to him. Are the two incidents similar?

The answers to the questions above are provided by the Senate Rules and Procedure. The Standing Orders book guides the Senate’s legislative business.

Pertinent to this issue, are clauses that empower the Senate President to allocate and reallocate seats as the need arises. Seats change in the Chamber from time to time without senators protesting because they know that occasions demand it and their rules permit it. 

Senators do not sit just anywhere at the plenary. This is to ensure Order and decorum in the hallowed Chamber. The practice in the Parliament all over the democratic world is that members sit with their party colleagues. Ruling party or majority party members have a section in the Chamber and those of the opposition or minority parties another section. 

A movement of members across party lines through defection will automatically necessitate an adjustment of the sitting arrangement.

Therefore, as explained by the Senate Chief Whip on Thursday, the change of Senator Natasha’s seat was made necessary by the defection on Wednesday 5th February 2025 of Senator Ned Nwoko of the Delta North Senatorial District from the PDP to the APC and Senator Ezenwa Francis Onyewuchi of the Imo East Senatorial District from Labour Party to APC as well.  

Therefore, Senator Natasha was not the only Senator affected by the changes in the sitting arrangement. The difference with the others was that they graciously accepted the change, obviously seeing no point in making a drama out of an innocuous, routine development in the hallowed Chamber.

Was Senator Natasha denied her right to speak in the Chamber that day? Nope. She was not recognised to speak because she was not on her seat, just like Senator Akpabio was not allowed to speak from Senator Ali Ndume’s seat in 2018, even though Akpabio moved over to another seat that day because the microphone on his allocated seat had malfunctioned. 

The then Senate President, Bukola Saraki was firm in his ruling that Akpabio would only be allowed to speak from an alternative seat (with a functioning microphone), which the Clerk of the Senate already provided him, but which he had rejected. Akpabio protested, but he eventually accepted the reallocated seat and apologized to the Senate.

That shows that Akpabio did not invent the rule that prevented Senator Natasha from speaking outside the seat allocated to her. He also did not apply the Rules to embarrass or victimize her.

Granting her recognition to speak after a Point of Order was raised by the Chief Whip and sustained would have been inconsistent with the Senate Rule. All that Senator Natasha was asked to do was to move to her seat to state her case of the alleged breach of her privilege.

It is noteworthy that neither of her two Senator colleagues from Kogi State agreed with Natasha on this issue. Senator Jibrin Isah, representing Kogi East, apologized on behalf of the Kogi Senate Caucus to the Senate while Senator Sunday Karimi, representing Kogi West, asked Natasha to apologise to the Senate for her conduct. 

To demonstrate that he had no personal issues with her, the Senate President eventually offered an apology to the Senate on her behalf for holding up the day’s proceeding, citing his own 2018 experience of how a firm application of the Rules can hurt some egos and be misinterpreted.

***Ola Awoniyi writes from Abuja

POLITICS

ADC Crisis: Court Battle Threatens Opposition’s 2027 Game Plan

Published

on

Share

By David Torough, Abuja

The crisis rocking the African Democratic Congress (ADC) has intensified following the Federal High Court judgment nullifying the David Mark-led leadership of the party, as National Secretary, Rauf Aregbesola, has appealed the ruling, while Minister of Aviation and Aerospace Development, Festus Keyamo, insists that the party will participate in the 2027 general elections, although candidates produced by the affected faction, including former Vice-President Atiku Abubakar, may be excluded from the ballot.

The unfolding political and legal developments have heightened uncertainty over the ADC’s leadership, the validity of its 2027 presidential nomination and its readiness for the forthcoming general elections, with the opposition party also raising concerns over alleged political violence, intimidation and the neutrality of electoral and security institutions.

Keyamo, in a statement posted on his verified X handle on Sunday, dismissed claims that the judgment had effectively barred the ADC from participating in the 2027 elections, arguing that the court’s decision concerned the legitimacy of the Mark-led leadership and not the continued existence or electoral eligibility of the party.

He, however, warned that the candidacies of individuals who emerged through the Mark-led faction, including Atiku Abubakar, could be affected by the outcome of the pending judicial proceedings.

“For the education of the public, those raising false alarm that the court judgment on ADC means the party will not be on the ballot are spreading misinformation.

“The ADC will be on the ballot. It is the David Mark faction of candidates, including Atiku Abubakar, that may not be on the ballot, depending on the final judgment of the Supreme Court,” Keyamo stated.

The minister also questioned the protests surrounding the judgment, arguing that Nigerians who participated in primaries conducted under the party’s original leadership structure should not be treated as less entitled to political participation than candidates produced by the Mark-led faction.

The controversy followed Thursday’s judgment by the Federal High Court in Abuja, presided over by Justice Peter Lifu, which nullified the Mark-led leadership and invalidated decisions taken by the faction, including the presidential primary that produced Atiku as the ADC’s candidate for the 2027 election.

The judgment arose from suit No. FHC/ABJ/CS/1819/2025, instituted by former ADC Deputy National Chairman (North-East), Nafiu Gombe, who challenged the process through which Mark and other members of the caretaker committee assumed control of the party.

Gombe argued that following the resignation of former National Chairman, Ralph Nwosu, he was constitutionally entitled to take over the party’s leadership, insisting that the emergence of the Mark-led leadership violated the ADC constitution and relevant electoral provisions.

The ruling has since generated fresh legal and political battles, with the affected leadership rejecting the decision and promising to challenge it.

In the latest development, Aregbesola has filed an appeal at the Court of Appeal, seeking to overturn the judgment on grounds that the Federal High Court lacked jurisdiction to determine the issues surrounding his emergence as national secretary and the validity of the resolutions of the party’s 99th National Executive Committee meeting.

In the notice of appeal filed on Friday through his counsel, Mohammed Sheriff, SAN, Aregbesola named Gombe, the ADC, Senator David Mark, the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC) and former National Chairman, Ralph Nwosu, as respondents.

He asked the appellate court to set aside the judgment, strike out the claims against him and invalidate the findings affecting his emergence as national secretary.

Alternatively, he urged the court to dismiss the claims or order a retrial before another judge if it upholds the jurisdiction of the lower court.

Aregbesola’s legal team argued that the trial judge failed to distinguish between an election to fill a vacant party position and an interim appointment authorised by the ADC constitution.

Specifically, the counsel maintained that Article 23(4) of the party’s constitution empowered the appropriate executive organ to appoint an eligible replacement pending an election at the next convention or congress.

He further argued that the trial court wrongly applied Section 82(3) of the Electoral Act 2022 and Section 223(1)(a) of the 1999 Constitution without first determining whether his emergence was an interim appointment rather than an election.

The ADC national secretary has also filed a separate motion at the Federal High Court seeking a stay of execution of the November 5 judgment pending the determination of his appeal.

He argued that the appeal raised substantial legal and factual questions, particularly concerning the jurisdiction of the trial court and the interpretation of the party’s constitution and applicable electoral laws.

Meanwhile, INEC has maintained that it would not take a position on the ADC leadership dispute until it obtains and studies the certified true copy of the judgment.

The commission’s position has added another layer of uncertainty to the party’s preparations, particularly as the legal battle could determine which faction is recognised to conduct valid party activities and nominate candidates for the 2027 elections.

Beyond the leadership dispute, the ADC Presidential Campaign Council (ADC-PCC) has accused the Federal Government and its alleged political allies of creating an atmosphere of intimidation and insecurity capable of undermining the 2027 electoral process.

The council declared that no amount of intimidation, violence or alleged manipulation of democratic institutions would prevent Nigerians from deciding the country’s political future, insisting that President Bola Ahmed Tinubu would lose the 2027 presidential election.

The Director of Media and Publicity of the ADC-PCC, Kola Ologbondiyan, made the position known on Sunday in Abuja, where he raised concerns over alleged attacks on opposition members and supporters in different parts of the country.

Ologbondiyan cited reports of the killing of several members of the Nigeria Democratic Congress (NDC) in Delta State, allegedly following an attack on the party’s campaign venue by suspected political thugs.

He also alleged that opposition parties, particularly the ADC, NDC and Allied Peoples Movement, had faced attacks and intimidation in Kaduna, Kogi, Katsina, Kebbi and Sokoto states.

The council described the incidents as a threat to democratic freedoms, warning that political violence should not be normalised or allowed to become part of the country’s electoral culture.

It also questioned the neutrality and preparedness of INEC, alleging that the commission’s voter register database had been compromised and that individuals sympathetic to the ruling All Progressives Congress had been placed in sensitive positions within the electoral body.

The ADC-PCC further accused security agencies of being deployed to harass, arrest and intimidate opposition members, raising particular concern over the alleged involvement of a serving director of a security agency in the APC Presidential Campaign Council as a co-director of National Security and Intelligence.

Ologbondiyan described the alleged development as a violation of the law establishing the agency, insisting that public institutions must remain politically neutral.

The council warned that alleged manipulation of judicial processes and electoral institutions would not guarantee President Tinubu’s re-election, adding that Nigerians would resist any attempt to impose a president through compromised judicial decisions or electoral fraud.

It consequently called on security agencies to remain loyal to the Constitution and the Nigerian people rather than any political party or individual.

The ADC-PCC also appealed to civil society organisations, the international community, religious leaders and traditional institutions to pay closer attention to the country’s political and security environment ahead of the 2027 elections.

The developments have placed the ADC at a critical crossroads, with the party’s participation in the next general elections appearing distinct from the question of which faction has the legal authority to nominate its candidates.

While Keyamo maintains that the ADC will be on the ballot, the fate of the Mark-led faction and its candidates remains subject to judicial determination.

With Aregbesola’s appeal, the Mark-led faction’s planned legal challenge and the pending determination of the leadership dispute, the Court of Appeal and ultimately the Supreme Court could prove decisive in determining the political future of the opposition party.

For Atiku and other candidates who emerged through the Mark-led structure, the stakes are particularly high, as the final outcome could determine whether their nominations survive the legal contest or are rendered invalid.

As the 2027 general elections approach, the ADC’s internal crisis, allegations of political violence and concerns over the credibility of electoral institutions are shaping an increasingly contentious political atmosphere, with the courts expected to play a defining role in determining the party’s direction.

Continue Reading

POLITICS

FG Secures $200m World Bank Support to Boost Aquaculture

Published

on

Share

By David Torough, Abuja

Nigeria’s annual fish supply deficit has exceeded 2.2 million tonnes, forcing the country to spend close to $1bn annually on imports, as the Federal Government moves to ramp up domestic production with a $200m World Bank-backed intervention.

The Minister of Marine and Blue Economy, Dr Adegboyega Oyetola, disclosed this in a statement issued on Sunday by his Special Adviser, Dr Bolaji Akinola, announcing plans to strengthen fisheries and aquaculture development across the country.

According to the minister, Nigeria requires approximately 3.

6 million tonnes of fish annually but produces only 1.4 million tonnes, leaving a substantial gap that local producers are unable to bridge.

The figures show that domestic production currently accounts for only about 39 per cent of national demand, while the remaining 61 per cent is largely met through imports, placing additional pressure on the country’s foreign exchange reserves.

Speaking through the Senior Special Assistant to the President on Marine and Blue Economy, Prof. Busayo Fakinlede, at an aquaculture investment training programme in Abuja, Oyetola stressed the need for Nigeria to reduce its dependence on imported fish.

He described fish production as critical to food security, household nutrition and rural livelihoods, insisting that the country must strengthen its capacity to meet domestic consumption needs.

“Fish is a pillar of food security, household nutrition and rural livelihoods. No nation can call itself food secure while it imports most of the fish it eats. Our ambition is to produce more, import less and, in time, become a net exporter. That ambition can be achieved only when every state plays its part,” he said.

Oyetola disclosed that the World Bank Group had committed $200m to support the development of fisheries and aquaculture, with the funding expected to be channelled to state governments through concessional loans.

The intervention is designed to expand production capacity, stimulate private-sector investment, create employment opportunities and improve the country’s food security outlook.

Under the proposed arrangement, participating states are expected to identify priority fisheries value chains, assess investment opportunities and develop bankable projects backed by measurable production targets.

The minister emphasised that closing the fish supply gap would require coordinated efforts involving federal and state governments, private investors and development partners.

He spoke at the Executive Training on Aquaculture Investment Guide, organised by the Ministry of Marine and Blue Economy in collaboration with the World Bank Group.

The programme attracted commissioners from Rivers, Bayelsa, Delta and Cross River states, alongside permanent secretaries and fisheries officials from across the federation.

Participants were trained in investment planning, risk management, environmental safeguards and public-private partnership frameworks to equip states with the capacity to attract and manage investments in the sector.

Oyetola also announced plans to convene a post-training stakeholders’ roundtable to strengthen implementation, improve coordination and secure commitments from state governments.

Highlighting developments in the sector, the minister said national fish production had risen from 1.1 million tonnes to 1.4 million tonnes, representing an increase of approximately 27.3 per cent.

He attributed the improvement to government interventions, including the inauguration of the Technical Committee on Accelerating Fish Production in August 2026 and the digitisation of fish import licensing.

Other initiatives, according to him, include Nigeria’s attainment of United States shrimp-export certification following compliance with Turtle Excluder Device requirements, as well as the development of the Fish City and Fish Terminal investment portfolio.

The government is expected to leverage these initiatives alongside the World Bank-backed financing to strengthen the country’s fisheries value chain and position aquaculture as a major contributor to economic growth.

Oyetola expressed optimism that sustained collaboration and investment would help close the production gap, improve livelihoods and reduce the country’s dependence on imported fish.

“Through strategic collaboration, contributive support and shared commitment, we will close the fish deficit, create jobs, raise household incomes and secure Nigeria’s place as a fish-sufficient nation,” he added.

Continue Reading

POLITICS

FG Generates N33tn Revenue in 10 Months – Oyedele

Published

on

Share

By Tony Obiechina, Abuja

The Federal Government generated N33tn in revenue between January and October 2026, while about 90 per cent of Nigeria’s data is hosted abroad, highlighting the country’s growing revenue capacity and dependence on foreign digital infrastructure.

The Minister of Finance and Coordinating Minister of the Economy, Taiwo Oyedele, disclosed the figures while delivering the convocation lecture at the University of Uyo, Akwa Ibom State.

In a statement issued on Thursday by his Senior Special Assistant on Communications and Press Secretary, Maryann Duke, Oyedele attributed the record revenue performance partly to improvements in digital tax administration and the introduction of electronic invoicing.

He said the increased use of digital systems had strengthened revenue collection, improved tax compliance and enhanced efficiency across government institutions.

Oyedele, however, raised concerns over Nigeria’s dependence on foreign digital infrastructure, citing estimates from the Nigeria Data Protection Commission that as much as 90 per cent of the country’s data is hosted outside its borders.

He also disclosed, citing Nigerian Communications Commission figures, that Nigeria had recorded more than 157 million active internet subscriptions as of May 2026.

According to him, these connections generate enormous volumes of data through financial transactions, healthcare, education and taxation, creating significant economic opportunities for the country.

He warned that hosting most of this data abroad has implications for foreign exchange expenditure, job creation, technological skills development and Nigeria’s control over information generated by its citizens.

The minister compared the situation to Nigeria’s historical dependence on imported refined petroleum products, cautioning against allowing the country’s data to be processed abroad while digital services are subsequently sold back to Nigerians.

He called for increased investment in local data infrastructure, cybersecurity, technical expertise and predictable regulations to enable Nigerian businesses to capture greater value from the digital economy.

Oyedele stressed that digital sovereignty should not mean technological isolation but should position Nigeria to compete more effectively in international markets.

Addressing graduating students, he urged young Nigerians to move beyond consuming foreign technological products and become developers of solutions that address local and global challenges.

He described artificial intelligence as both a disruptive force and an opportunity for innovation, advising graduates to combine digital skills with critical thinking, creativity, sound judgement and integrity.

The minister also warned that irresponsible online conduct could affect employment opportunities, business relationships and professional credibility, as digital footprints increasingly shape public perception.

He urged universities to strengthen partnerships with government and industry to develop practical solutions in agriculture, energy, healthcare, environmental sustainability and digital services.

According to him, the performance of higher institutions should be measured not only by graduation figures and academic publications but also by businesses established, innovations developed and economic problems solved.

Oyedele outlined five priorities for graduates: continuous learning, value creation, integrity, responsible digital citizenship and active participation in national development.

“Your degree is evidence of what you have learned. Your competence will demonstrate what you can do. Your character will reveal who you truly are,” he told the graduating students.

He urged the graduates to combine innovation with ethical conduct and contribute to building an economy driven by local expertise, productive enterprises and technological advancement.

Continue Reading

Advertisement

Top Stories

NEWS42 minutes ago

Customs Generates N1.4tn Revenue in Two Months

ShareBy Julius Tambaya, Abuja The Nigeria Customs Service (NCS) generated a total of N1.419 trillion in revenue between September and...

Energy and Power49 minutes ago

Tegbe Assures Nigerians of Swift Restoration of Power Supply

ShareThe Minister of Power, Joseph Tegbe, has assured Nigerians experiencing reduced electricity supply in parts of the country of a...

Health57 minutes ago

WAHO Leads Drive to Harmonise Subspecialty Training Across ECOWAS

ShareBy David Torough, Abuja Accredited health professional colleges, training institutions and regulatory bodies across the Economic Community of West African...

General News1 hour ago

Bishop Oyedepo Re-affirms strong support for Pastor Ibiyeomie, Pastor Komaiya’s Ministry

ShareBy David Torough, Abuja  The Founder and Presiding Bishop of Living Faith Church Worldwide, Bishop David Oyedepo, has reaffirm strong...

NEWS13 hours ago

West Africa: How WAHO Successfully Harmonized Procedure Manuals for Health Disciplines and Professions

ShareBy David Torough After three days of serious brain-storming sessions in Abuja, the West African Health Organization (WAHO), has successfully...

NEWS13 hours ago

2027: CAN Seeks Return of Sacked Traditional Rulers in Kaduna

ShareFrom Shabanyan Kantiok, Kaduna The Christian Association of Nigeria in Chikun Local Government Area of Kaduna State has urged Christian...

NEWS13 hours ago

OPay Opens New Kano Office, Strengthens Commitment to Nigeria’s Financial Inclusion

ShareOPay, Nigeria’s leading digital bank, has opened a new office in Kano State, strengthening its presence in Nigeria and bringing...

NEWS13 hours ago

Rigging Years Before Elections: Why Tinubu, Parliament Favours Staggered Balloting

Share Silhouette of Donald Andoor e‐mail; doandoor@gmail.com There is a growing need for Nigerians to look beyond the ballot box and...

NEWS13 hours ago

Akpabio Congratulates Nigeria’s Golden Girls, Flamingos

ShareThe President of the Senate, Godswill Akpabio has sent a hearty congratulations to the Nigerian Under-17 Women’s National Team on...

NEWS13 hours ago

Customs Generates N1.4tn Revenue in Two Months

ShareBy Julius Tambaya, Abuja The Nigeria Customs Service (NCS) generated a total of N1.419 trillion in revenue between September and...