NEWS
Fear and Fragility: How Safe are Nigerians?
By Dakuku Peterside
When dawn cracks open the Nigerian sky these days, the first breath many people take is heavy with questions that shouldn’t linger in a country as rich in potential as Nigeria. It used to be enough to worry about food on the table or the children’s school fees, but now an even more primal fear sits beside those old burdens: “Am I safe enough to see tomorrow?” Once upon a time, these worries were spoken in hushed tones only in the North-East, in places where Boko Haram and ISWAP turned towns into ghost settlements and farms into mass graves.
But now, fear has found new postcodes, new voices, and new victims. From wedding convoys ambushed on the road in Plateau to explosions rocking markets in Kano, from gun battles in Kaduna’s streets to soldiers ambushed in Niger State, the message is clear: the fear of sudden violence is no longer distant. It has become the air we breathe.Just in the last fortnight, a series of chilling incidents cut through every illusion that anywhere in Nigeria is truly safe. Benue is already a story of a killing field. Thirty-one travellers going from Kaduna to a wedding in Plateau were attacked on the road; twelve didn’t make it back alive, and the rest are scarred by a memory they will carry to their graves. In Borno’s Konduga village, mourners gathered to bury loved ones only to be ripped apart by suicide bombers — with over thirty dead in a single, devastating heartbeat.Kano, a city known for its industriousness and commerce, shuddered when a deadly explosion in Sabon Gari killed nine people and injured dozens more; a blast rumoured to be linked to illegal storage of explosives but symbolising something bigger: that even the places where business booms are just a spark away from tragedy.In Barnawa, Kaduna, people cowered behind locked doors as police exchanged fire with armed robbers in a broad daylight shootout that left the air thick with the smell of gunpowder. Niger State saw its horror when soldiers manning a checkpoint near Kontagora were ambushed and killed, and had their weapons stolen — evidence that the guardians themselves have become targets.These tragedies are not isolated dots on a tragic map; they form a pattern that millions of Nigerians have come to accept as the new normal. And that is where the real danger lies: when fear becomes familiar, hopelessness creeps in. But while the bullets and bombs make headlines, there is a quieter violence that maims just as deeply — the violence of economic insecurity.It sits in the market stall where a mother must decide what to buy when the naira in her purse has lost its worth overnight. It waits in the empty fields in Zamfara and Katsina, where farmers have fled because to tend crops is now to risk being kidnapped or killed. When you stitch the numbers together, you see a nation not just wounded but drifting on a tide of fear and uncertainty.It’s not only Nigerians who see this. A recent global survey by a Singaporean firm looked at 180 countries through the lens of safety and well-being. It measured nine key areas: personal safety, quality of life, cost of living, global peace, purchasing power, healthcare, property affordability, commute times, and employment rates. Nigeria didn’t make the top 100 places where citizens feel safe — neither physically nor financially.Our Quality-of-Life Index dropped from 5th to 6th in Africa in 2025, primarily due to a combination of runaway inflation, deteriorating infrastructure, and persistently high unemployment rates. The Global Peace Index ranks us 146th out of 163 countries. On healthcare, we lag embarrassingly far behind, with fewer than 0.4 doctors for every thousand people, while the global average stands at 1.6. Meanwhile, our Purchasing Power Index continues to decline as the naira loses value and prices spiral upward.Against this backdrop, President Tinubu took the rostrum of the National Assembly on Democracy Day and declared, “National security is the foundation of peace and progress. We have intensified security operations to reclaim communities from criminals and terrorists… our highways are safer, and we invest in technology and training to secure every inch of this country.” His government’s numbers are indeed impressive: N6.11 trillion — the most significant defence allocation in Nigerian history — was apportioned, from the record N54.99 trillion budget for 2025. He has initiated discussions on constitutional amendments for state policing and signalled his readiness to move policing to the Concurrent List.Yet, the gulf between appropriation and outcome is measured in graves, not spreadsheets. Within a week of the Democracy Day address, a suicide bomber blew apart market-goers in Konduga; within days, a mortar shell tore through a Kano factory; within hours of new “precision strikes” in Niger State, fourteen soldiers lay dead.Critics ask why, after two supplementary defence budgets and a raft of new commanders, bandits still dictate farming cycles, and kidnapping cartels still fix ransom prices. The AP’s report on the Benue massacre notes that Tinubu’s visit came days late and yielded no immediate arrests, fuelling accusations of a “react-don’t-prevent” doctrine. The bigger structural reforms — professionalised local policing, swift judicial processes, socio-economic buffers — remain promises in committee rooms, while communities improvise barricades.So, when people ask, “Are Nigerians safe?” the honest answer is that many aren’t — not from the gunman on the highway nor the slow violence of poverty that drains hope from the bones. This is why the core argument must ring loud: our leaders — local, state, and federal — must finally grasp that security is not just soldiers at checkpoints or more guns in the hands of the police.Security must be understood in all its dimensions. Economic insecurity is as dangerous as physical insecurity. A hungry nation will never be a peaceful nation; a country where 50 per cent of youth are unemployed or underemployed is not a country that can sleep with both eyes closed.National security underpins everything: peace, stability, the welfare of the people, the unity of the republic, and the sovereignty that many cherish on Independence Day. Without a sense of safety — that you can farm your land, run your shop, send your kids to school and expect them to come home — all talk of national pride becomes empty theatre.A strong economy is the very spine that holds up the shield of defence. If a country is to stand resilient against disruptions — from terror to inflation to pandemics — it must have the means to defend its people’s livelihoods as well as their lives.The broader consequences of ignoring this truth are already visible: investors pack their bags, youth find new homes across oceans, communities fracture into suspicion and blame, and the dream of unity becomes a political slogan rather than a lived reality.Families are displaced by violence and driven deeper into poverty. Social trust erodes when people see criminals roam free and the powerful escape consequences. Insecurity, whether it wears camouflage or a suit, flourishes when the state cannot deliver on its most basic promise: that people should live and work in peace and contentment.So, what should we do with this grim reflection? We can’t continue with ritual condemnations that dry up in press conferences. We must build a new understanding that security is a basket with many eggs: reforming security forces to protect, not exploit; investing in local intelligence and community policing, so that trust replaces fear; taming inflation with policies that don’t just favour the elite; reviving the economy by fixing roads, energising power supply, supporting farmers, and encouraging industries to absorb our restless youth.We need a healthcare system that works, schools that stay open and deliver real learning, and courts that convict criminals, regardless of their connections. Defence spending must be matched by transparent audits and a parallel surge in humanitarian and reconstruction funds, particularly for the farms and schools that violence has emptied. And the social compact must be rebuilt. Citizens who trust that the government will protect their pockets are likelier to share intelligence that protects their neighbours’ lives.This is not a one-person job. It is a task that calls on every Nigerian — leaders who must put self-interest aside, security agencies who must prioritise human rights, civil society who must continue pushing for accountability, and citizens who must hold those in power to their promises. Only then can we break this cycle where every dawn begins with the same whispered question, “Am I safe today?”We must create a Nigeria where that question fades and is replaced by the certainty that whether you are a farmer in Zamfara, a student in Maiduguri, a trader in Kano, a nurse in Kaduna, a trader in Onitsha, or a civil servant in Abeokuta, you can live, work and hope without fear.Safety must become more than a privilege for the few; it must be a birthright for all. Until we get there, we will continue to count the bodies, bury the dreams, and wonder what it will take to turn this fragile state of safety into something more substantial, something real, something truly Nigerian.Dakuku Peterside, a public sector turnaround expert, public policy analyst and leadership coach, is the author of the forthcoming book, “Leading in a Storm”, a book on crisis leadership.
NEWS
NCS Warns Drug Smugglers After N5.8m Seizure
By Tambaya Julius, Abuja
The Nigeria Customs Service (NCS), Sokoto/Zamfara Area Command, has intercepted unregistered pharmaceutical products worth ₦5.8 million in Sokoto State.
The products were handed over to the National Agency for Food and Drug Administration and Control (NAFDAC) on Wednesday for further investigation and necessary action.
The Acting Customs Area Comptroller, Halliru Abdullahi, said the drugs were intercepted by Customs patrol teams along the Illela-Sokoto road following credible intelligence.
He said the operation was part of efforts to curb smuggling, protect public health and enforce relevant laws, in line with the directive of the Comptroller-General of Customs, Bashir Adeniyi.
Abdullahi said the handover demonstrated the continued cooperation between the two agencies in tackling the circulation of unregistered pharmaceutical products.
The seized items included 360 packages of anti-cold medication, each containing 50 cards of four tablets; 500 packages of Amodiaquine, each containing 25 cards of three tablets; 140 packages of Paracetamol, each containing 100 cards of 10 tablets; and 100 packages of Quinine, each containing 10 cards of 10 tablets.
According to him, the importation of the unregistered drugs contravenes Section 55 of the Nigeria Customs Service Act, 2023, as well as relevant NAFDAC regulations.
He warned that unregistered medicines could pose serious health risks to consumers because they had not been certified for consumption.
“Let me use this opportunity to warn smugglers and those who deal in such unwholesome products that Sokoto/Zamfara Command, under my watch, will not tolerate any form of smuggling,” Abdullahi said.
He added that the command remained committed to protecting the health of Nigerians and safeguarding the nation’s economy.
The comptroller commended the officers involved in the seizure for their diligence and bravery and appreciated NAFDAC for its continued partnership with the Customs Service.
Receiving the products, NAFDAC’s Sokoto State Coordinator, Abdeslam Lawal, thanked the Customs Service for the seizure and its sustained cooperation with the agency.
Speaking on behalf of NAFDAC Director-General, Prof. Mojisola Adeyeye, and the agency’s management, Lawal said collaboration between the two organisations was essential to preventing unsafe and unregistered products from circulating in the country.
He commended the Customs officers for their efforts and called for sustained cooperation between the agencies to strengthen the protection of public health.
NEWS
PETAN Advocates Indigenous Capacity Development to Address Oil Industry Technical Gaps
Petroleum Technology Association of Nigeria (PETAN), has strongly encouraged indigenous oil and gas companies to strengthen technical capability in order to close existing gaps in the country’s oil and gas industry.
The group said that as an association of indigenous technical oilfield service companies, it will pursue partnerships across the sector to broaden technical gaps and entrench skills and knowledge acquisition among members.
Making his remarks on Monday during its round Media Roundtable, in Lagos, Publicity Secretary of the PETAN, Dr. Joan Faluyi, said the event’s technical capability would form an integral part of discussion.
He said the theme, The State of Nigeria’s Oil and Gas Industry: Opportunities and Challenges,” provides an opportunity to examine where we are, what needs attention, and what it will take to move forward.
The conversation brings the perspective of businesses and professionals directly involved in delivering the work of the industry.
That perspective connects investment plans and policy ambitions with the people, equipment, skills and services needed to put them into practice.
Faluyi, remarked, “When we speak about indigenous capacity, we are speaking about the engineer solving a difficult problem, the technician maintaining critical equipment, the fabricator producing to the required standard, and the young professional gaining the experience to take on greater responsibility.
“We are also speaking about entrepreneurs who invest in facilities, develop their teams and carry the responsibility of delivering work safely, reliably and competitively.”
He argued that the opportunities and challenges before these businesses deserve attention because their ability to grow has implications for employment, skills development and the value Nigeria retains fromits petroleum resources.
“As we consider the industry’s future, we should therefore ask practical questions. How can investment create more opportunities for capable Nigerian companies? What will enable these businesses to strengthen their expertise and compete on quality? How can young Nigerians gain the practical experience needed to build lasting careers in the sector?
He said these are questions worth examining carefully, with evidence and with an understanding of the realities of doing the work.
According to him, Technical experience is valuable, and so is the ability to explain that experience clearly, answer questions and listen to different perspectives.
NEWS
Pandemic Profiteering Demands More Than a Doctor’s Prosecution
By Fransiscus Nanga Roka
A patient was treated every ninth second, which alone would suggest that there were problems with emergency health care spending before the use of federal money from the U.S.
Treasury. Dr. Joseph A. Montes’ prosecution in Houston has raised concerns regarding how well emergency health care spending could distinguish between legitimate medical services and possibly a fraudulent billing scheme.Montes, 66, was indicted on twelve federal charges on September 30, 2026. The indictment was unsealed on October 6, 2026 by the Justice Department. Prosecutors allege that from 2020 to 2022, Montes’ clinics were reimbursed approximately $20 million out of the $30 million that the clinics claimed to receive from the Health Resources and Services Administration.
As of now, these allegations are merely charges, and therefore Montes remains presumed innocent.The prosecutors state that how he was able to commit these offenses was quite straightforward. He established pop-up COVID-19 clinic locations using his own name; collected nasal swabs from individuals attending those clinic locations; and submitted billing to insurance companies for “office visits” which the prosecutors allege did not occur. From January to November 2021, the prosecutors believe he submitted approximately 3,000 evaluation-and-management claims during at least 29 separate time
frames. Along with the claims, prosecutors are also alleging he paid for a purchase of a high-end vehicle from a car dealer and items from Tiffany & Co.
If this is indeed correct, it would represent a massive breach of confidence that has been placed upon physicians. This would indicate that all people that had gone to seek testing during the time period of the pandemic were being used as mere tools to extract money from the public.
The mathematics of this situation are extremely important to ensure the accuracy of the data. For example, simply because there were 9,000 claims submitted in a single day doesn’t necessarily mean that 9,000 consultations occurred that same day. In many cases, a legitimate provider can send in multiple claims at once as part of a batch. Therefore, investigators will need to determine when services were provided; who was responsible for providing those services; what percentage of the total number of employees working during the period of service provision; whether documentation exists regarding the services provided; and if patients were actually seen by clinicians.
This is intended to provide greater responsibility for your actions. When you discover something unusual or out of place (an anomaly), this should encourage you to delve deeper into the matter. To establish evidence of fraud, you need to provide supporting documentation.
This is a much broader policy question that cannot be avoided. Although emergency reimbursement needs to occur quickly, when quick reimbursements occur without a reasonable degree of verification, there are many opportunities for abuse. At the same time, if all reimbursements were frozen indiscriminately, then we may create a great deal of financial stress for legitimate health care professionals and limit patient access to necessary care. Therefore, an appropriate level of monitoring must distinguish between suspected fraudulent billing practices and the high-volume use of tests. Washington needs five concrete reforms.
The next generation of emergency program administrators, including HRSA, must develop and use billing validation systems to check whether the billed service is consistent with the documented clinical capability. When a large volume of services is billed, and it appears highly unlikely that such a service can be delivered given the clinical capability documented, then an immediate human review is required. For the purpose of protecting legitimate providers from unfairly having their payments reduced or withheld, the human reviews will have time limits for responses and a formalized appeal process.
The second condition is that there needs to be an identifiable relationship between each of the encounters being reimbursed, the date of service, the clinician performing the service, and any other pertinent documentation. In addition, the billing agent may not use their authority to convert a diagnostic test into a separate consultation and then bill separately for that diagnostic test.
The third way to help patients identify fraudulent claims is to send patients simple, clear notifications about which services they received that are being charged to them. Also, providing an easy-to-use way for patients to challenge those charges will help patients spot potential fraudulent claims without sharing too much of their personal health information.
The fourth step for both Congress and the Inspector General at HHS is to have an outside entity conduct an assessment of the program’s control mechanisms (e.g., how often people receive warning notices, if people acknowledge receiving warning notices, what the payment contractor did once they received warning notices) using an objective analysis. There is enough evidence in the indictment to indicate that the program’s control mechanisms were insufficient, however there is no evidence that indicates negligence on the part of regulatory agencies.
Fifth, prosecutors must pursue every participant as established through evidence, and once their guilt is determined, the prosecutor may use the law to recover the criminal proceeds. Each disciplinary action against a professional will be based on an independent review of the evidence and in order to safeguard the right to due process.
Successful performance of a program is measured by the reduction of incorrect payments, resolution time of alerts, money collected from fraud, and continuous availability of legitimate healthcare services for individuals who require them rather than solely through the number of arrests.
A global lesson about emergency medical services funding has been learned from outside of Houston. Each government which provides financial assistance to emergency medical service providers must create a governance framework as part of its funding application.
A criminal court will determine whether one physician is accountable for what occurred. At the same time, a public inquiry should establish whether the system created to protect emergency healthcare funding was adequate enough to accomplish this. The taxpayers would like to have answers from the government as well. The patients are looking for a system that can understand its mistakes before the next crisis occurs.
Fransiscus Nanga Roka


