JUDICIARY
Federal High Court Declares Jonathan Eligible

From Tayese Mike, Yenagoa
The controversies surrounding former President Goodluck Ebele Jonathan’s eligiblity to contest next year’s presidential election has been put to rest as the Federal High Court sitting in Yenagoa has declared that former the President is eligible to contest the 2023 presidential election.
Though Jonathan himself has not come out categorically to declare to Nigerians whether he will context or not and under what platform even though it is being speculated that he might contest under the platform of the All Progressives Congress(APC).
The presiding judge, Justice Isa Dashen made the declaration in the judgement that lasted for over two hours on Friday.
Justice Dashen held that Jonathan only was elected into the office of the President of the Federal Republic of Nigeria once in 2011 as he only completed the term of Late President Umaru Musa Yar’adua in 2010 “not on the basis of any election but by constitutional appointment.”
He further declared as “spurious, baseless and unsubstantiated,” the plaintiffs claims that Jonathan has been elected as president on two previous elections.
He also ruled that Jonathan’s right to contest for the office of president again cannot be denied by any retroactive law.
In an origination summons filed by some members of the All Progressives Congress, APC, led by Andy Solomon and Idibiye Abraham, the plaintiffs had sought an order of the court stating that Jonathan is not affected by the fourth alteration to the constitution barring Vice-Presidents who succeed their principals from serving more than one full term.
In the suit marked FHC/YNG/CS/86/2022, the Jonathan, the All Progressives Congress, APC, and the Independent National Electoral Commission, INEC, were listed as defendants.
Reacting to the judgement, counsel to Jonathan, Eric Omare, said: “Some members of the All Progressives Congress, APC, led by Andy Solomon approached the federal high court to seek for two declarations essentially, his case was that by virtue of Section 137 subsections1(b), Jonathan having taken the oath of office as president on two occasions is disqualified from contesting the presidential election.
“Secondly, he also contended that by virtue of Section 137 subsection 3 which was brought into the Constitution by the fourth alterations to the Constitution in 2018, Jonathan having completed the term of Late President Umaru Musa Yar’adua and having served one term is no longer qualified to contest.
“We joined the issues with them and today in a well considered judgment that lasted for over two hours, the court agree with us that one, Jonathan only had not contested for the President of the Federal Republic of Nigeria on two occasions that he only completed the term of Late President Yar’adua on the basis of constitutional requirements.
“Secondly, the court also held that the fourth alteration which also introduced Sections 137, subsection 3, does not apply to disqualify Jonathan, so in summary the court agree with us and held that Jonathan is qualified t contest the 2023 presidential election.”
In his reaction to judgement, counsel to the plaintiffs, Sigha Egbuwabi, said: “We are the plaintiffs counsel in this suit challenging the eligibility of the first defendant Dr. Goodluck Ebele Jonathan, we canvassed our position before the court that he is no longer eligible by the introduction of Section 137 subsection (1b) and subsection 3 because he has taken the oath for the office of the president twice.
“Because he has taken the oath to the office of the President twice and by introduction of subsections 3 which is the law as it is now, it is our position that under that law he is going to be screened for the election coming 2023 which primaries will commence very soon.
“What we have canvasses is that he is no longer eligible, ordinarily we know that former President Jonathan is a good person, a person who has ruled this country with integrity and dignity, we do not have any challenge having him back again, however, we also do not want a situation where he will come to transgressed the law.
“For so much integrity he has acquired, he worked hard to acquire all these and he will be allowed to slip into an error that will make him transgressed the law will not equally speak well of him. That was the reason why our clients who were the plaintiffs instituted this matter.
“The court has though ruled otherwise but we are eager to have a copy of the judgement, we will come together look at it critically but I always assuage everybody that we will go to the court of appeal to test it.
It is not as if we are eager to deny him contesting the presidential election but what we are maintains is that he cannot be allowed to transgressed the law that is what we are maintaining and by provisions of that Subsection 3 though its commence in 2018, what we are maintaining is that he is no longer eligible, the law now as it is, we are talking of the law as it is, not the law as its ought to be, not the law, not the law as it was but the law as it is.”
As at the time of filling in this report, their is no official statement from former president Jonathan media team as the numbers of his media is switched off.
JUDICIARY
Court Acquits Medical Doctor of Cybercrime Charges

The Federal High Court in Abuja has dismissed cybercrime charges filed by the Inspector-General of Police against a female medical doctor, Bolanle Aseyan. Delivering judgment on Friday, Justice Peter Lifu discharged and acquitted Aseyan, stating that the police failed to prove the essential elements of the alleged offences.
The Inspector-General had arraigned Aseyan on a four-count charge of defamation, harassment, and intimidation against another doctor, Olufunmilayo Ogunsanya. The police alleged that Aseyan used social media platforms to harm Ogunsanya’s reputation. He was said to be her former boyfriend. The charges were filed under Section 24 of the Cybercrime (Prohibition, Prevention) Act, which addresses online threats and cyber harassment. To support the case, the police presented three witnesses. Aseyan also called two witnesses to testify in her defence during the trial. Justice Lifu, while reviewing the matter, noted both doctors were once in a romantic relationship before it turned sour. He further observed that the two had sexual relations while in the United Kingdom and later made conflicting social media posts against each other. The judge held that the prosecution failed to prove its case beyond reasonable doubt and therefore could not secure a conviction. Specifically, the judge said the defendant’s alleged Twitter handle used in the cyberbullying was not tendered as evidence before the court. Justice Lifu also said there was no proof of threats or intimidation, but rather evidence of a previous affectionate relationship. Consequently, the judge dismissed all four charges, discharged and acquitted Aseyan, and declared the case closed. He ordered the police to immediately return all seized items, including her international passport, upon service of the judgment. Aseyan said she met Ogunsanya online in 2019 and travelled to the United Kingdom in 2020, where she claimed she was raped. She stated that upon arrival in Leeds on March 7, 2020, tired and disoriented, Ogunsanya offered her wine shortly after she got to his home. She alleged that after taking the drink, she passed out and later woke up to find that he had allegedly had sex with her without consent. Aseyan further claimed that Ogunsanya maltreated her before she returned to Nigeria shortly after the alleged incident. (NAN)JUDICIARY
Kwara Court Sentences Abdulrahman Bello to Death by Hanging for Murder of Hafsoh Lawal.

From Abdullahi Abubakar, Ilorin.
A Kwara State High court sitting in Ilorin has sentenced Abdulrahman Bello, a self-acclaimed cleric and the killer of Hafsoh Lawal, a final year student of the Kwara State College of Education to death, by hanging. This was contained in a judgement delivered by Justice Hannah Ajayi on Thursday, in which, four other defendants were set free and cleared of any wrongdoings.
Charged with five-count, the judge started by acquitting the four out of the five defendants namely Ahmed Abdulwasiu, Jamiu Uthman, Suleiman Muyideen and Abdulrahman Jamiu of any complicity, subsequently setting them free of taking part in the death of the victim (Hafsoh Lawal).
However, Justice Ajayi, while delivering judgment on the main culprit, described Bello’s act as cruel, wicked, and an extreme display of human wickedness, saying all evidence proved that Hafsoh was killed in order to be used for money ritual and trading in human parts.
The judge further noted that Abdulrahman’s confession of love and plan to marry the victim, are all concocted lies to lure her to his residence in order to kill her. She therefore sentenced Abdulrahman Bello to death by hanging while setting free the other four suspects not guilty.
It would be recalled that the victim went missing, sometimes in February 2025, shortly after attending the naming ceremony of a family member. When she left, but didn’t return later in the day, her parents went into panic mode, and search party was raised, and a complaint was lodged at the police station.
Her phone line was tracked, and traced to the suspect’s (as it were) area. Upon invitation and interrogation, it was discovered that he is a serial killer, who had killed many victims before Hafsoh.
JUDICIARY
Pastor Arraigned over Alleged Rape of Married Woman in Edo

From Joseph Ebi Kanjo, Benin
A 38-year-old pastor, Simeon Okehielem of the Synagogue Prayers Ministry has been arraigned before an Edo State High Court for allegedly raping a married woman, Isoken Vivian Aigbedo.
The pastor, who was accused of engaging in sexual relationships with married women within his congregation, was docked before the court in Benin City, on Thursday last week.
The charges against Pastor Okehielem followed a year 2022 incident in Uholor Community of Benin City where the cleric allegedly drugged and raped the woman leading to the birth of a child.
Recent DNA results reportedly confirmed the pastor as the biological father of the child, which prompted the Nigerian Police to re-arrest and formally arraign him.
The presiding judge, Justice Erhabor, granted an ex-parte order to remand the suspect at the Benin Correctional Custodial Centre for 14 days, pending legal advice from the Director of Public Prosecution (DPP), Ministry of Justice, Edo State.
The State Prosecutor, P.O. Odion told the court that the alleged offence occurred in February 2022.
Okehielem was slammed with two-count charge on alleged rape and administering a stupefying substance with the intent to commit a felony.
The charge sheet, marked Suit No: BLOD/2323M/2025, reads: “That you, Okehielem Simeon ‘m’, in or about the month of February 2022, in Benin City within the Benin Criminal Division, did rape one Mrs Isoken Vivian Aigbedo and thereby committed an offence contrary to Section 4, punishable under Section 5(1) of the Violence Against Persons (Prohibition) Law, 2021.
“That you, Okehielem Simeon ‘m’, in or about the month of February 2022, in Benin City within the Benin Criminal Division, with intent to commit a felony, administered a substance to stupefy one Mrs Isoken Vivian Aigbedo, thereby committing an offence punishable under Section 256 of the Criminal Law of Edo State, 2022.”
Speaking to journalists after the court session, the victim’s legal counsel, Clinton Ogbebor, applauded the Police for its diligence.
“We are in court today over the alleged rape of my client, Mrs Isoken Aigbedo, by one Pastor Simeon Okehielem,” he said.
Ogbebor confirmed that the case file would now be forwarded to the office of the DPP for legal advice, after which the trial will proceed accordingly.
The development has stirred debates across Benin City, with residents and religious leaders expressing shock and calling for justice.
The case has been adjourned pending further legal advice from the Director of Public Prosecution.