Connect with us

NEWS

Attack on SDP: Kogi Govt Debunks Claims, Afirms Commitment to Peace, Security

Published

on

Share

From Joseph Amedu, Lokoja

The Kogi State Government has debunked what it described as a headless allegation by the Social Democratic Party that it masterminded attacks on witnesses at the ongoing Governorship Election Petition Tribunal and affirmed its commitment to peace and security.

The state government said, contrary to the propaganda of the SDP, discerning members of the public were following the Tribunal case and would know that there was no way anyone would plot an attack against witnesses that were already testifying against those who paid them to testify and doing enough to make SDP lose woefully.

The Commissioner for Information and Communications in the state, Kingsley Fanwo, said it was, however, important to enlighten the SDP that the case at the Tribunal was between parties and that the State Government, which it accused, was not one. 

Fanwo, who spoke at a press conference in Lokoja, on Saturday, noted that if any attack did happen as claimed by the SDP, “it must have been stage-managed by the SDP to justify their failure to produce the number of witnesses they claimed to have in line with their modus operandi as witnessed during the campaign.”

“Why would anyone attempt or even attack a witness that has testified against those that paid him to witness for them? The discerning public is following the tribunal case and understands there is no need to attack witnesses that are doing enough to make SDP lose woefully in the law court,” he said.

The state government noted that it was absurd and incomprehensible for the SDP to continue to exhibit anti-democratic tendencies and provoke the sensibility of the people in such a reckless manner, adding that “if they are so confident in their incompetent petition, why resort to self help?” 

“As a legitimate Government, we won’t be soiled in the oil of subjudice that the SDP has engaged in with impunity. We will protect all the people and residents of the State and also protect our integrity and image,” the Commissioner stated.

He said, “We wouldn’t have bothered to respond to the barking of the SDP and its leadership as the State Government is busy with governance; but it is important to set the record straight and address the minds of the public to the tradition of lies by the SDP. 

“The Kogi State Government under the leadership of His Excellency, Alh Ahmed Usman Ododo, the democratically elected Governor of the State, will be undaunted in its resolve to serve the people of the State rather than be entangled in the propaganda festival by a jobless and idle party.”

According to him, the Kogi State Government is unwavering in its stance on security and constitutionalism as the basic minimum in ensuring a peaceful and secured state.

The Commissioner added that it was the responsibility of the Government to protect all citizens, irrespective of their political or religious persuasions. 

“To this end, the State Government did not receive any report of politically stirred crisis and therefore surprised at the blatant, false, spurious and pedestrian claims by the Social Democratic Party in the party’s usual way of whipping up sentiments and spreading falsehood to win public sympathy,” he said.

The state government stated, “It is clear that SDP’s petition is suffering an irreversible setback at the Tribunal as the comedians they presented as witnesses probably didn’t rehearse their lines well or they are falling because their claims have their foundation in fiction. It will be unacceptable for them to vent their impending failure on the State Government that is doing all it can to provide security for all in the State.

“The Kogi State Government doesn’t subscribe to violence and actions that breach the peace of the State. We will also not accept statements deliberately made to incite the people against the Government and possibly spark panic. The SDP must always be prepared for the consequences of their actions and utterances against the Kogi State Government or its officials. 

“The illogic of the SDP’s claims is characteristic of a party that is desperately making efforts to hug the limelight through propaganda. 

“The Governor of Kogi State is a law abiding gentleman who is working hard to consolidate on the achievements of the immediate past administration. He promised to protect all Kogites irrespective of their political and religious beliefs. His commitment to fulfilling such promises is iron cast and unimpeachable. 

“For the National Chairman of the SDP to make false claims against the Kogi State Government before gentlemen of the Press is further proof of the party’s irrelevance and the reason the party is not controlling any state in the Federation. Kogi State cannot be a podium for the SDP to test its songs of division, ethnic bigotry and violence. 

“We urge the people of the State to go about their normal businesses as there won’t be any chance for anyone to attack any Kogite. No stone will be left unturned to ensure peace and security in the State.”

NEWS

Abuja Court Dismisses Age Falsification Case Against Senior Police Officers

Published

on

Share

Justice Yusuf Haliru of the Federal Capital Territory,( FCT) High Court Abuja, has dismissed a case brought against some senior police officers in which they were accused of age falsification.
In a landmark judgment Monday, the Vourt ruled that the prosecution failed to establish a sustainable case against the officers adding that the criminal allegations against the senior police officers were simply malicious.

The former Inspector General of Police, Kayode Egbetokun,had instituted the case againt the accused officers, against retired Assistant Inspector-General of Police Idowu Owohunwa, retired Commissioner of Police Benneth Igweh, retired Commissioner of Police Ukachi Peter Opara, retired Deputy Commissioner of Police Obo Ukam Obo, and retired Assistant Commissioner of Police Simon A.

Lough (SAN).

The officers were arraigned on a 14-count charge over alleged falsification of their ages and official police records.

In his judgment however, Justice Halilu dismissed all the charges, and held that the prosecution failed to establish a sustainable basis for the criminal case against the retired officers.

The judge further ruled that the circumstances surrounding the prosecution suggested that the charges were instituted out of malice, particularly as several courts had already dismissed similar cases involving other police officers, with some of those decisions affirmed by the Court of Appeal.

Consequently, rhe Judge discharged the defendants, bringing to an end the case.

In February 2025, the IGP had asked the officers to face disciplinary committee for either overstaying 35 years of service or failure to retire on attainment of 60 years of age.
It was reported then that the accused officers threatened then-Inspector-General of Police Egbetokun, to retire alongside them because he had also exceeded the statutory retirement threshold.

Egbetokun had directed the officers to appear before the Force Disciplinary Committee between February 10 and February 13, 2025.

The officers, however, reportedly maintained that Egbetokun lacked the legal authority to discipline or retire them because, according to them, he had himself passed his official retirement date of September 4, 2024, and remained in office only after President Bola Tinubu approved his tenure elongation.Abuja Court Dismisses Age Falsification Case Against Senior Police Officers

Justice Yusuf Haliru of the Federal Capital Territory,( FCT) High Court Abuja, has dismissed a case brought against some senior police officers in which they were accused of age falsification.
In a landmark judgment Monday, the Vourt ruled that the prosecution failed to establish a sustainable case against the officers adding that the criminal allegations against the senior police officers were simply malicious.

The former Inspector General of Police, Kayode Egbetokun,had instituted the case againt the accused officers, against retired Assistant Inspector-General of Police Idowu Owohunwa, retired Commissioner of Police Benneth Igweh, retired Commissioner of Police Ukachi Peter Opara, retired Deputy Commissioner of Police Obo Ukam Obo, and retired Assistant Commissioner of Police Simon A. Lough (SAN).

The officers were arraigned on a 14-count charge over alleged falsification of their ages and official police records.

In his judgment however, Justice Halilu dismissed all the charges, and held that the prosecution failed to establish a sustainable basis for the criminal case against the retired officers.

The judge further ruled that the circumstances surrounding the prosecution suggested that the charges were instituted out of malice, particularly as several courts had already dismissed similar cases involving other police officers, with some of those decisions affirmed by the Court of Appeal.

Consequently, rhe Judge discharged the defendants, bringing to an end the case.

In February 2025, the IGP had asked the officers to face disciplinary committee for either overstaying 35 years of service or failure to retire on attainment of 60 years of age.
It was reported then that the accused officers threatened then-Inspector-General of Police Egbetokun, to retire alongside them because he had also exceeded the statutory retirement threshold.

Egbetokun had directed the officers to appear before the Force Disciplinary Committee between February 10 and February 13, 2025.

The officers, however, reportedly maintained that Egbetokun lacked the legal authority to discipline or retire them because, according to them, he had himself passed his official retirement date of September 4, 2024, and remained in office only after President Bola Tinubu approved his tenure elongation.Abuja Court Dismisses Age Falsification Case Against Senior Police Officers

Justice Yusuf Haliru of the Federal Capital Territory,( FCT) High Court Abuja, has dismissed a case brought against some senior police officers in which they were accused of age falsification.
In a landmark judgment Monday, the Vourt ruled that the prosecution failed to establish a sustainable case against the officers adding that the criminal allegations against the senior police officers were simply malicious.

The former Inspector General of Police, Kayode Egbetokun,had instituted the case againt the accused officers, against retired Assistant Inspector-General of Police Idowu Owohunwa, retired Commissioner of Police Benneth Igweh, retired Commissioner of Police Ukachi Peter Opara, retired Deputy Commissioner of Police Obo Ukam Obo, and retired Assistant Commissioner of Police Simon A. Lough (SAN).

The officers were arraigned on a 14-count charge over alleged falsification of their ages and official police records.

In his judgment however, Justice Halilu dismissed all the charges, and held that the prosecution failed to establish a sustainable basis for the criminal case against the retired officers.

The judge further ruled that the circumstances surrounding the prosecution suggested that the charges were instituted out of malice, particularly as several courts had already dismissed similar cases involving other police officers, with some of those decisions affirmed by the Court of Appeal.

Consequently, rhe Judge discharged the defendants, bringing to an end the case.

In February 2025, the IGP had asked the officers to face disciplinary committee for either overstaying 35 years of service or failure to retire on attainment of 60 years of age.
It was reported then that the accused officers threatened then-Inspector-General of Police Egbetokun, to retire alongside them because he had also exceeded the statutory retirement threshold.

Egbetokun had directed the officers to appear before the Force Disciplinary Committee between February 10 and February 13, 2025.

The officers, however, reportedly maintained that Egbetokun lacked the legal authority to discipline or retire them because, according to them, he had himself passed his official retirement date of September 4, 2024, and remained in office only after President Bola Tinubu approved his tenure elongation.Abuja Court Dismisses Age Falsification Case Against Senior Police Officers

Justice Yusuf Haliru of the Federal Capital Territory,( FCT) High Court Abuja, has dismissed a case brought against some senior police officers in which they were accused of age falsification.
In a landmark judgment Monday, the Vourt ruled that the prosecution failed to establish a sustainable case against the officers adding that the criminal allegations against the senior police officers were simply malicious.

The former Inspector General of Police, Kayode Egbetokun,had instituted the case againt the accused officers, against retired Assistant Inspector-General of Police Idowu Owohunwa, retired Commissioner of Police Benneth Igweh, retired Commissioner of Police Ukachi Peter Opara, retired Deputy Commissioner of Police Obo Ukam Obo, and retired Assistant Commissioner of Police Simon A. Lough (SAN).

The officers were arraigned on a 14-count charge over alleged falsification of their ages and official police records.

In his judgment however, Justice Halilu dismissed all the charges, and held that the prosecution failed to establish a sustainable basis for the criminal case against the retired officers.

The judge further ruled that the circumstances surrounding the prosecution suggested that the charges were instituted out of malice, particularly as several courts had already dismissed similar cases involving other police officers, with some of those decisions affirmed by the Court of Appeal.

Consequently, rhe Judge discharged the defendants, bringing to an end the case.

In February 2025, the IGP had asked the officers to face disciplinary committee for either overstaying 35 years of service or failure to retire on attainment of 60 years of age.
It was reported then that the accused officers threatened then-Inspector-General of Police Egbetokun, to retire alongside them because he had also exceeded the statutory retirement threshold.

Egbetokun had directed the officers to appear before the Force Disciplinary Committee between February 10 and February 13, 2025.

The officers, however, reportedly maintained that Egbetokun lacked the legal authority to discipline or retire them because, according to them, he had himself passed his official retirement date of September 4, 2024, and remained in office only after President Bola Tinubu approved his tenure elongation.VVVVVVVVVVVVVVVAbuja Court Dismisses Age Falsification Case Against Senior Police Officers

Justice Yusuf Haliru of the Federal Capital Territory,( FCT) High Court Abuja, has dismissed a case brought against some senior police officers in which they were accused of age falsification.
In a landmark judgment Monday, the Vourt ruled that the prosecution failed to establish a sustainable case against the officers adding that the criminal allegations against the senior police officers were simply malicious.

The former Inspector General of Police, Kayode Egbetokun,had instituted the case againt the accused officers, against retired Assistant Inspector-General of Police Idowu Owohunwa, retired Commissioner of Police Benneth Igweh, retired Commissioner of Police Ukachi Peter Opara, retired Deputy Commissioner of Police Obo Ukam Obo, and retired Assistant Commissioner of Police Simon A. Lough (SAN).

The officers were arraigned on a 14-count charge over alleged falsification of their ages and official police records.

In his judgment however, Justice Halilu dismissed all the charges, and held that the prosecution failed to establish a sustainable basis for the criminal case against the retired officers.

The judge further ruled that the circumstances surrounding the prosecution suggested that the charges were instituted out of malice, particularly as several courts had already dismissed similar cases involving other police officers, with some of those decisions affirmed by the Court of Appeal.

Consequently, the Judge discharged the defendants, bringing to an end the case.

In February 2025, the IGP had asked the officers to face disciplinary committee for either overstaying 35 years of service or failure to retire on attainment of 60 years of age.
It was reported then that the accused officers threatened then-Inspector-General of Police Egbetokun, to retire alongside them because he had also exceeded the statutory retirement threshold.

Egbetokun had directed the officers to appear before the Force Disciplinary Committee between February 10 and February 13, 2025.

The officers, however, reportedly maintained that Egbetokun lacked the legal authority to discipline or retire them because, according to them, he had himself passed his official retirement date of September 4, 2024, and remained in office only after President Bola Tinubu approved his tenure elongation.Justice Yusuf Haliru of the Federal Capital Territory,( FCT) High Court Abuja, has dismissed a case brought against some senior police officers in which they were accused of age falsification.
In a landmark judgment Monday, the Vourt ruled that the prosecution failed to establish a sustainable case against the officers adding that the criminal allegations against the senior police officers were simply malicious.

The former Inspector General of Police, Kayode Egbetokun,had instituted the case againt the accused officers, against retired Assistant Inspector-General of Police Idowu Owohunwa, retired Commissioner of Police Benneth Igweh, retired Commissioner of Police Ukachi Peter Opara, retired Deputy Commissioner of Police Obo Ukam Obo, and retired Assistant Commissioner of Police Simon A. Lough (SAN).

The officers were arraigned on a 14-count charge over alleged falsification of their ages and official police records.

In his judgment however, Justice Halilu dismissed all the charges, and held that the prosecution failed to establish a sustainable basis for the criminal case against the retired officers.

The judge further ruled that the circumstances surrounding the prosecution suggested that the charges were instituted out of malice, particularly as several courts had already dismissed similar cases involving other police officers, with some of those decisions affirmed by the Court of Appeal.

Consequently, rhe Judge discharged the defendants, bringing to an end the case.

In February 2025, the IGP had asked the officers to face disciplinary committee for either overstaying 35 years of service or failure to retire on attainment of 60 years of age.
It was reported then that the accused officers threatened then-Inspector-General of Police Egbetokun, to retire alongside them because he had also exceeded the statutory retirement threshold.

Egbetokun had directed the officers to appear before the Force Disciplinary Committee between February 10 and February 13, 2025.

The officers, however, reportedly maintained that Egbetokun lacked the legal authority to discipline or retire them because, according to them, he had himself passed his official retirement date of September 4, 2024, and remained in office only after President Bola Tinubu approved his tenure elongation.

Continue Reading

Education

FG Withdraws Registration Fees Hike on WASSCE, NECO, SSCE

Published

on

Share

By Tony Obiechina, Abuja

The Federal Government has suspended the proposed review of registration fees for the 2027 West African Senior School Certificate Examination (WASSCE) and the National Examinations Council (NECO) Senior School Certificate Examination (SSCE).

The federal government last week announced the jacking up of the fees from N27,500 to N50,000.

However, in a statement on Monday July 13, 2026, signed by Director, Press and Public Relations, Boriowo Folasade, the Federal Ministry of Education announced that the letter conveying the proposed fee adjustment, dated June 18, 2026, has been withdrawn to allow for a comprehensive review and broader consultations with all relevant stakeholders before a final decision is taken.

According to the statement, the Ministry acknowledged the concerns and constructive feedback received from the public and appreciates the keen interest shown by Nigerians in matters relating to access to quality education.

The statement read: “The proposed review was informed by the prevailing economic realities and the rising cost of conducting credible national examinations.

“The current examination registration fees have remained largely unchanged for several years despite significant increases in operational costs, including logistics, security, printing of examination materials, technology deployment, quality assurance and other essential services required to maintain the integrity and credibility of public examinations across the country.

“Nevertheless, the Honourable Minister of Education, Dr. Maruf Tunji Alausa, has directed that the proposal be placed on hold in line with the Federal Government’s commitment to inclusive, transparent and evidence-based policymaking.

“This decision underscores the Ministry’s determination to ensure that policies affecting millions of Nigerian students and their families are carefully considered, socially responsive and reflect the collective interest of the nation.

“As part of the fresh review process, the Ministry will further engage extensively with examination bodies, State Ministries of Education, school proprietors and administrators, parents’ associations, organised labour, education stakeholders and other critical partners to ensure that any future decision is fair, sustainable, transparent and responsive to prevailing realities while safeguarding access to education.

“Accordingly, the proposed review of examination registration fees will not take effect, as earlier communicated, pending the conclusion of the consultation process.

“The Federal Ministry of Education reassures Nigerians that the welfare of students, equitable access to quality education and responsible policy decisions remain at the heart of the Renewed Hope Agenda of President Bola Tinubu, for the education sector.

“The Ministry appreciates the understanding, patience and continued support of all stakeholders and remains committed to keeping the public fully informed throughout the consultation process.”, it added.

Continue Reading

Education

Education Stakeholders Split over FG’s N50,000 WAEC, NECO Examinations Fee

Published

on

Share

The Federal Government’s approval of a N50,000 registration fee for National Examinations Council (NECO) and West African Examinations Council (WAEC) from 2027 has attracted mixed reactions from education stakeholders.

In separate interviews on Sunday in Abuja, some of the stakeholders described the increase as excessive and unaffordable, warning it could worsen financial pressure on families and students.

Others urged the government to review the decision, introduce subsidies for vulnerable candidates, and ensure any fee adjustment reflects prevailing economic realities and wider stakeholder consultations.

However, some stakeholders supported the review, arguing that improved funding could strengthen certificate verification, digital infrastructure and service delivery if implemented with transparency and affordability safeguards.

The approval was conveyed by the Federal Ministry of Education in a memo dated June 18, 2026, signed by the Director of Senior Secondary Education, Adeniji Ibrahim.

The memo was signed on behalf of the Minister of Education, Dr. Tunji Alausa, following a directive to harmonise WAEC and NECO Senior School Certificate Examination registration fees.

Under the approval, NECO’s SSCE internal fee will rise from N30,000 to N50,000, while WAEC’s will increase from N27,000 to N50,000 from 2027.

An educationist, Beatrice Oke, described the increase as excessive despite acknowledging rising operational and logistics costs.

“The percentage increase is too high, although we expected a review after some time due to rising logistics costs.

“However, many average Nigerians may not afford the new fees, and this could force some students out of school,” she said.

Oke urged the government to review the increase or introduce measures to cushion its impact on low-income households.

She said affordable examination fees were vital to sustaining access to education and preventing more children from dropping out of school.

She also urged governments at all levels to expand subsidies and intervention programmes for vulnerable students to guarantee equitable access to education.

A private school owner, Funmilayo Soyoye, also described the increase as excessive.

She said many graduates seeking employment or admission for further studies might struggle to pay the new fee.

“Certificate verification is a mandatory requirement for many academic and employment processes and should remain affordable.

“The government should consider the economic realities facing Nigerians before approving such a sharp increase.

“This policy may discourage many young people from pursuing opportunities that require certificate verification,” she said.

Another school owner, who preferred anonymity, urged the government to justify the increase.

The proprietor said any fee review should be transparent and reflect improvements in service delivery.

According to the school owner, certificate verification should become faster, more efficient and more accessible.

A parent, Alhaji Abdulfatai Ibrahim, appealed to the government to rescind the decision in the interest of students and job seekers.

He said the increase would worsen hardship for families already grappling with rising education costs.

Ibrahim urged the authorities to engage stakeholders and adopt a more moderate pricing structure.

However, an education consultant, Olamide Ogunkoya, said the review might be justified if it strengthened certificate verification and digital infrastructure.

She said investment in secure verification systems would curb certificate fraud and enhance the credibility of Nigerian examination bodies.

Ogunkoya urged the government to balance cost recovery with citizens’ access to essential public services.

She also called for wider consultations before implementing major education policies, stressing that affordability and accessibility should remain central to reforms.

The memo, directed to the Registrar, NECO, conveying the increase, read:

“Re: Upward review of registration fees for examinations conducted by NECO.

“The West African Examinations Council has requested an upward review of the examination fees for the Senior School Certificate Examination for school candidates, with effect from 2027.

“You may recall that at a meeting of examination bodies held with the Honourable Minister of Education on March 31, 2026, where the need for upward review of examination fee was discussed, the Honourable Minister of Education directed that WAEC and NECOshould adopt a uniform fee for the conduct of the SSCE.

“Consequently, I am directed to convey the Honourable Minister of Education’s approval of the sum of Fifty Thousand Naira (N50,000) only, as the new examination fee for candidates with effect from NECO SSCE internal 2027.

“You are to bring the content of this letter to all stakeholders.

“Please accept the Honourable Minister’s warm regards.”

Continue Reading

Advertisement

Top Stories

NEWS8 hours ago

Abuja Court Dismisses Age Falsification Case Against Senior Police Officers

Share Justice Yusuf Haliru of the Federal Capital Territory,( FCT) High Court Abuja, has dismissed a case brought against some...

SPORTS21 hours ago

World Cup 2026: France Set to Clash with Spain in Epic Battle

ShareTwo-time World Cup champions France will on Tuesday take on Spain, the reigning European champions and 2010 FIFA World Cup...

view point21 hours ago

State Police and Fear of Governors’ Abuse

ShareBy Tochukwu Jimo Obi The debate over the creation of state police in Nigeria has continued to generate intense public...

Education21 hours ago

FG Withdraws Registration Fees Hike on WASSCE, NECO, SSCE

ShareBy Tony Obiechina, Abuja The Federal Government has suspended the proposed review of registration fees for the 2027 West African...

Education21 hours ago

Education Stakeholders Split over FG’s N50,000 WAEC, NECO Examinations Fee

ShareThe Federal Government’s approval of a N50,000 registration fee for National Examinations Council (NECO) and West African Examinations Council (WAEC)...

CRIME21 hours ago

Triple Murder Suspect Appears in South Africa Court

ShareA man suspected of killing his wife and two daughters in Bedfordshire has been in court in South Africa after...

SPORTS21 hours ago

England to Wear All-white Kit against Argentina

ShareEngland will wear their all-white home kit to face Argentina in the semi-finals of the World Cup in Atlanta on...

SPORTS21 hours ago

CAF President Mourns South Africa W’Cup Player, Jayden Adams

ShareConfédération Africaine de Football Président Dr. Patrice Motsepe has expressed sadness over the death of South Africa international and Mamelodi...

POLITICS21 hours ago

2027: YPP Presidential Candidate Pledges Inclusive Governance

ShareBy Julius Tambaya, Abuja  The presidential candidate of the Young Progressive Party (YPP), Peter Agada, has pledged to usher in...

POLITICS21 hours ago

ADC Dismisses Rival Nomination Portal Claim, Urges INEC to Probe Alleged Forgery

ShareAfrican Democratic Congress (ADC) has dismissed the claims by a rival group of uploading presidential nomination details to the Independent...