By Shaagee Orkula, Abuja

A report released by ACIOE Associates has shown that between 2009 and 2019, eight oil producing states shared a whooping N6.589 trillion from the Federation Account under the 13 per cent derivation principle.

 There is, however, nothing on ground in these states to show for the huge revenue, a new report by ACIOE Associates has shown.

The report, which the DAILY ASSET perused yesterday, following its release to key officers of the National Assembly and aides to the President and Minister of Niger Delta Affairs, at a webinar in Abuja, listed Abia, Akwa-Ibom, Bayelsa, Delta, Edo, Imo, Ondo and Rivers states as beneficiaries of the fund.

According to the report titled: ‘Impact of the 13% Derivation Fund in the Niger Delta’, ACIOE Associates revealed that in the 11-year period, Abia, Akwa Ibom, Bayelsa, Delta, and Edo states received N55.87 billion, N1.33 trillion, N1.388 trillion, N1.16 trillion and N118.85 billion respectively, while Imo, Ondo and Rivers States received N1.28 trillion, N189.277 billion and N1.057 trillion respectively.

ACIOE Associates, Project Lead, Mrs. Funmi Adesanya, who presented the report, pointed that despite the huge fund allocated to the Niger Delta, its researchers found out that access to electricity remained minimal to people in the region; absence of potable drinking water; deplorable health care facilities; and poor educational infrastructure.

 “Most of the basic amenities that exist in the selected oil communities are provided by either joint venture partnerships between the Niger Delta Development Commission (NDDC) or Nigerian National Petroleum Corporation (NNPC) or the International Oil Companies (IOC), as part of their corporate social responsibility.

“This trend is more prevalent in states like Akwa Ibom, Bayelsa and Rivers States where the IOCs provide water, health, electricity supply and education facilities pursuant to Global Memorandum of Understanding (GMOU) agreements between the IOCS and the respective oil producing communities in the aforementioned States.

“There is also lack of a structured framework for commissioning infrastructure projects across the communities, which has left a number of oil producing communities with little or no infrastructure,” the report stated.

ACIOE managing Director, Mr. Ekenem Isichei, speaking on the findings, affirmed that the findings of the report were corroborated by data obtained from the Office of the Accountant-General, the Nigeria Extractive Industries Transparency Initiative (NEITI), State Government Financial Statements, where possible and interviews with host community members.

Special Assistant to the Minister of Niger Delta Affairs, Mr. Charles Achodo, who also commented on the report, called for an urgent clarification on the 13 percent derivation principle to forestall further abuse and mismanagement of the funds to the detriment of oil-producing communities.

“When 13 per cent is given, the governors share it among themselves. On the part of the Federal Government, they have done a poor job in terms of communication. It is supposed to clarify what the 13 per cent is meant for, if it is for the state or for the communities where the oil is produced from.

“The Act made it so broad; it did not specify the issue. The Act needed to be clarified, that it is not meant for the entire state, but for the oil producing communities, taking the resources at that subsidiary levels, would help achieve a lot at that level,” he said.

In his reaction, Senior Special Assistant to the President on Niger Delta Affairs, Office of the Vice President, Mr. Edobor Iyamu, noted: “Most times, people fail to acknowledge that there are some monies that are paid to the state governments and not many people want to know how it is being spent.

“A lot of money has been disbursed to the state governments, even though we know a lot more still needs to be done in the region.”

The Chairman, House Committee on Environment, Honourable Johnson Oghuma, made the case for the need to increase the derivation from 13 per cent, noting that the review was long overdue.

“Also, there is the need to amend the law, as we are disbursing the money properly. The fund also needed to be policed to ensure effective utilization. There is a need to review the law and the percent, and there should be a way to capture and police what is going on. The host communities should be the focus,” he averred.

The report in its recommendation advocated the legislation of fiscal rules to improve transparency and accountability of public expenditure as practiced in Ghana and Uganda.

Such rules, it noted, would harp on uniform vertical transfers of derivation funds to curb the practice of discretionary transfers currently practiced by Niger delta States; and the prescription of adequate budget preparation procedures that ensures a proper needs assessment of the intended beneficiaries are carried, ahead of prospective budget implementations.

It further stressed that it would also centre on the development of resource allocation criteria that are ‘downwardly accountable’, particularly to the intended beneficiaries of the derivation funds; consistent publishing of fiscal information and ensuring access to such information; and earmarking a considerable proportion of the derivation funds for specific sectoral development such as health, education, facilitation of portable water, among others.