By Laide Akinboade, Abuja

The Minister of Federal Capital Territory (FCT), Nyesom Wike, on Thursday dragged the striking workers of FCTA to National Industrial Court of Nigeria, (NICN).

The FCT Minister, of Thursday, took the striking workers to NICN, and got order of interlocutory injunction restraining the workers, under the Joint Union Action Congress (JUAC) their agents, privies, representatives, assigns or whatsoever which comprises all Trade Unions, from further embarking on any industrial action, picketing or lock out  with a view to crippling, blocking roads or obstructing the flow of vehicular movement, shutting down operations of the secretariat .

This ruling comes after workers under the aegis of the Joint Union Action Committee (JUAC) embarked on an indefinite strike over the non-payment of promotion arrears and other entitlements on Monday.

In a ruling on Thursday, January 21, 2026, Honourable Justice E. D. Subilim granted an application filed by the minister of the FCT and the FCTA, restraining the union officials from proceeding with the industrial action.

The defendants, Rifkatu Iortyer and Abdullahi Umar Saleh, identified as President and Secretary of the Joint Unions Action Committee (JUAC) were not present in court.

The FCTA’s legal team, led by Dr Ogwu J. Onoja, SAN, argued that the proposed strike was illegal and would paralyse the administration’s operations.

Justice Subilim held that the applicants had established a case warranting judicial intervention. 

The court consequently issued the injunction, restraining the union and its members from any action that would cripple FCTA activities. Due to the defendants’ absence, the court also approved substituted service of the legal documents. 

It ordered that the Originating Summons, which challenges the strike’s legality, be published in a national newspaper like the Leadership Newspaper and posted at the committee’s office at the FCTA Secretariat on Kapital Street, Area 11, Garki, Abuja.

The summons raises fundamental legal questions, challenging whether the strike was called in compliance with the Trade Disputes Act and contesting the legal status of the Joint Unions Action Committee, which is not a registered trade union.

The case has been adjourned to Monday, January 26, 2026, for a hearing of the Motion on Notice.

The ruling is a pre-emptive move by the FCTA to avert operational disruption and compels the union to justify its actions within the legal framework.

When contacted, one of the union leaders, who preferred anonymity, said, “Since the administration wants us to continue our agitation in court, we will go to court to defend our actions.”

By Ademola Oshodi

Guinea’s presidential inauguration on January 17, 2026, marked a formal return to constitutional rule following the September 2021 military coup that dismantled the country’s democratic order. That ceremony did not conclude Guinea’s transition.

 Instead, it inaugurated a broader regional test: whether the Economic Community of West African States, with the leadership of Nigeria and commitment of President Bola Tinubu, can still enforce its democratic norms, and whether Nigeria, as the bloc’s most influential member, can translate diplomatic weight into principled leadership

The presidential election held on December 28, 2025, Guinea’s first since the 2021 coup, has assumed significance beyond national politics.

How ECOWAS responds, and how Nigeria shapes that response, carries implications beyond Conakry. It speaks directly to the credibility of regional democracy promotion in an era when unconstitutional changes of government and tightly managed transitions are no longer exceptional.

Guinea’s transition sits at the intersection of two competing imperatives: the need to stabilise post-coup states and the obligation to prevent the normalisation of power acquired through unconstitutional means. Nigeria’s role within ECOWAS places it at the centre of this tension. 

Since the overthrow of President Alpha Condé, the bloc has relied heavily on Abuja’s diplomatic engagement to balance pressure with dialogue. This reflects Nigeria’s long-standing assessment that unconstitutional seizures of power generate security, economic, and political risks that rarely remain contained within national borders.

In practice, instability in one member state reverberates across the region through insecurity, disrupted trade, and weakened collective institutions, costs that Nigeria often absorbs disproportionately.

The December 2025 election represented an important procedural milestone, but it did not constitute a definitive democratic settlement. Mamady Doumbouya, who led the 2021 coup, was declared the winner with 86.72 per cent of the vote from an officially reported turnout of 80.95 per cent. International reporting confirmed that voting day itself was largely calm.

 It also documented deeper structural constraints that shaped the political environment, including the dissolution of multiple political parties, restrictions on opposition activity, and the sidelining or exile of prominent political figures. 

These conditions are not incidental. They determine whether elections operate as mechanisms of genuine competition or as vehicles for consolidating post-coup incumbency.

Nigeria’s diplomacy has had to operate within this reality. On the one hand, the organisation of a presidential election marked a necessary departure from prolonged military rule following the suspension of the constitution and the dismantling of democratic institutions after the 2021 coup.

On the other hand, the political conditions surrounding the vote raised legitimate questions about inclusiveness and competitiveness. Nigeria’s engagement has reflected an effort to recognise procedural progress without collapsing democratic legitimacy into the mere occurrence of an election.

Nigeria’s decision to maintain high-level engagement with Guinea should be understood within this context. The attendance of Vice President Kashim Shettima at Guinea’s presidential inauguration was not an ad hoc gesture. It was framed by the Presidency as a reaffirmation of Nigeria’s leadership role within ECOWAS and its commitment to regional stability.

Nigeria’s presence in Conakry signalled support for constitutional order while preserving channels for continued engagement on democratic consolidation and governance reforms. This approach aligns with ECOWAS’ established logic of phased reintegration rather than abrupt normalisation.

Crucially, Nigeria’s engagement with Guinea neither began on election day nor ended with the inauguration. It has been anchored in process-oriented diplomacy, working through ECOWAS to sustain pressure for a return to constitutional rule while avoiding the kind of isolation that can entrench military dominance and deepen instability.

This method is consistent with Nigeria’s historical approach to regional crises. In Liberia and Sierra Leone in the 1990s, and in The Gambia in 2017, Nigeria combined sustained engagement with clearly articulated normative boundaries. The current cycle of coups has complicated this model but not rendered it irrelevant.

Recent ECOWAS precedents underscore what is at stake. The imposition of heavy sanctions on Mali in 2022 following repeated election delays, and the suspension of Burkina Faso after its coup the same year, established expectations that unconstitutional changes of government would attract collective consequences. 

These actions signalled that transitions would be assessed against substantive benchmarks, not merely the scheduling of elections. Guinea’s case tests whether those standards will be applied consistently, or whether the threshold for democratic restoration risks being lowered through selective accommodation.

For Nigeria, this question is not abstract. Guinea is a strategically significant state whose political economy has regional implications. Mining accounts for roughly 90 per cent of Guinea’s exports and over one fifth of its GDP, and the country holds the world’s largest bauxite reserves at 7.4 billion tonnes. Governance outcomes in Conakry, therefore, shape investment patterns, resource governance norms, and economic stability across West Africa.

For Nigeria, whose economy and security environment are deeply intertwined with regional dynamics, the consolidation of accountable civilian rule in Guinea is a matter of pragmatic foreign policy rather than normative idealism.

This strategic realism explains Nigeria’s tone within ECOWAS. Rather than treating Guinea’s transition as a binary success or failure, Nigeria has emphasised the restoration of constitutional order as an ongoing process, with a focus on the post-election phase. 

This includes credible legislative and local elections, the restoration of political party rights through due process, and effective civilian oversight of the security sector, expectations that remain fully consistent with the 2001 ECOWAS Supplementary Protocol on Democracy and Good Governance.

Nigeria’s leadership under President Bola Tinubu has been shaped by this dual imperative of stability and standards. As ECOWAS confronts its most serious credibility challenge in decades, including the announced withdrawal of Niger, Mali, and Burkina Faso in 2024, Abuja has sought to prevent further erosion of the bloc’s normative authority.

Engagement with Guinea, in this context, is not an endorsement of every aspect of its transition. It is an effort to keep Guinea anchored within a regional framework where democratic benchmarks remain negotiable only in sequence, not in principle.

That said, clarity remains essential. If ECOWAS restores Guinea to full decision-making status solely on the basis that an election has occurred, it risks reinforcing a precedent in which coups are converted into civilian incumbency through tightly managed ballots.

Nigeria’s responsibility, as the bloc’s most consequential actor, is to ensure that reintegration remains conditional, transparent, and tied to measurable reforms. This is not punitive. It is protective of ECOWAS’ credibility and of the democratic standards the organisation was created to uphold.

Nigeria’s diplomacy toward Guinea thus reflects a broader foreign policy logic. It recognises political realities while insisting on institutional standards. It avoids isolation that could push states further from regional frameworks, while resisting the temptation to redefine democracy downward for the sake of short-term calm. 

This balance carries risk, but it remains consistent with Nigeria’s historical role as a stabilising anchor in West Africa.

Guinea’s reintegration into ECOWAS should therefore continue to be phased and conditional, linked to concrete benchmarks such as credible legislative and local elections, the restoration of political party rights through due process, protection for peaceful opposition activity, and effective civilian oversight of the security sector. These measures are not obstacles to stability; they are the mechanisms through which stability acquires democratic substance.

For West Africa, democracy remains a process rather than an event. The region’s future will be shaped by whether regional leaders insist that transitions remain credible, competitive, and accountable over time and not by isolated election days.

Nigeria’s engagement with Guinea demonstrates how leadership within ECOWAS can reinforce that principle, if elections are treated as gateways to sustained accountability rather than endpoints.

Oshodi, Senior Special Assistant to President Tinubu on Foreign Affairs and Protocol, writes from Abuja

By Donald Andoor, Abuja.

National Chairman, Arewa Consultative Forum (ACF), Chief Mike Mamman Osuman, a Senior Advocate of Nigeria (SAN) has confirmed participation at the 9th DAILY ASSET Annual Awards, which holds February 5, at NICON Luxury Hotel, Abuja.

Osuman, a legal luminary and one – time Attorney General and Commissioner of Justice in Benue State will preside over the grand event as Chairman and also receive the newspaper’s ‘Life Time Achievement Award’ in recognition of his numerous accomplishments over the decades.

Osuman, who received a delegation of Asset Newspapers Limited at his palatial Quid-Juris Chambers at Brick City Estate, Kubwa, FCT said he was honoured to have been found worthy for the award.

“ As a Lawyer, I have enjoyed my practice. In the course of my career, I turned down the offer to serve as Federal High Court Judge because I enjoy the legal practice. I don’t seek limelight but I have found DAILY ASSET a very credible medium to identify with,” he told the delegation led by the newspaper’s Publisher, Dr Cletus Akwaya.

The Minister of Livestock Development, Dr Mukhtar Idi Maiha, has also confirmed his availability to attend the event to receive the award of ‘Minister of the Year.’ Maiha was selected by the Board of Editors of DAILY ASSET for his giant steps to transform the Livestock sector as the pioneer Minister and the peace building efforts, which have helped largely to curb conflicts between herders and farmers in some communities in the crisis-prone states like Benue, Plateau, Nasarawa, Kaduna and Niger among others.

The Minister conveyed his acceptance through his Technical Adviser on Knowledge Management, Richard Mbalama.

Similarly, Group Vice President(Oil and Gas), Dangote Industries Group, Mr Edwin Devakumar has written to accept his award nomination and confirmed participation at the February 5, event.

“ I am highly honoured by your selection of me as the “Corporate Achiever of the year 2025 award. I am also humbled by your appreciation of of the efforts which have gone into the design, engineering, construction, commissioning and the operation of the World’s Largest Single Train Petroleum refinery,” Devakumar said in a letter he personally signed, dated 19th January addressed to the DAILY ASSET Publisher.

Frontline businessman and Industrialist, Dr Peter Adejoh, has also signified his intention to attend the ceremony to receive the award of “Philanthropist of the Year 2025”

“The CEO is deeply honoured by this recognition and sincerely appreciates Daily Asset for finding his philanthropic contributions worthy of such a prestigious award.

  “We commend Daily Asset for its commitment to recognizing excellence, leadership, and social responsibility, and we appreciate the platform you provide in celebrating individuals who contribute meaningfully to societal development. Kindly accept this letter as our official acceptance of the award. We look forward to participating in the event as communicated by your organization”Sandra Marcus, Executive Assistant to the CEO wrote in a letter on behalf of the Peter Adejoh Foundation.

Other award nominees in different categories had earlier written to accept their nominations and confirm participation at the event. Their confirmations were published in the newspaper’s edition of January 21. They include, Governor of Enugu, Dr Peter Mbah; Former Deputy Governor of Benue State, Chief Steven Lawani; National Vice Chairman, North East, All Progressives Congress(APC), Dr Mustapha Salihu; Chairman, House of Representatives Committee on Police Institutions, Hon Aliyu Wakili Boya; Fintech Giants, Opay Digital Services Limited and Presidential Initiative on Compressed Natural Gas(Pi-CNG).