POLITICS
‘Federalism Means Eating what You Kill’
By Bámidélé Adémólá-Olátéjú
Yet again, yesterday, September 6, the Federal Government through the Federal Inland Revenue Service (FIRS) lost its bid to stop Rivers State (and by extension all the states of the federation) from collecting value added tax (VAT) for consumption carried out within its jurisdiction.
Governor Nyesom Wike took the bull by the horns and earned my respect in this case. It is a landmark judgement that is poised to poke through the unstable flooring of our federal system. Wike is set to help clear our democratic confusion with regard to the accountability and responsibility of states within the federal structure. True federalism means that states must have the capacity to shape their destinies by responding to their unique demographics and social circumstances.Nigeria’s independence was negotiated on the platform of federalism. By design, federalism assumes that the central governments should not do everything. The appeal of federalism to our founding fathers was that Nigerians of every tongue and creed, will live in the same national space, but with each region having the liberty to design its development according to its differences in culture and other preferences that are important to the ways and quality of life of its people. Americans captured the essence of federalism as: “E pluribus unum” or “Out of many, one”. Many responsibilities are meant to be the preserve of state governments in a federal system.
Essentially, federalism is about which tier of government is doing or not doing what. Former Canadian Prime Minister, John Diefenbaker, described federalism best when he said: “Federalism means that you eat what you kill”. The 1963 Constitution was predicated on every region eating whatever they killed. Among the key political actors of the time, Chief Obafemi Awolowo, Sir Ahmadu Bello and Dr Nnamdi Azikiwe, there was no disagreement on federalism. There was no need to replace it. Before our cheese was moved, every region was doing great and developing on the basis of what “they killed”. Then the question: Who fixed what was not broken? Why was the Constitution abrogated? Who took Federal out of our Federal Republic? The answer lies in the Unification Decree No 34 of 1966. Cleverly, the unitarist position in the National Council of Nigeria and the Cameroons (NCNC) manifesto of 1951 found its way into the Unification Decree of 1966. For fifty-five years, we have tumbled through unfortunate rapids and bends on our unitary misadventure.
Time has run out! We can’t continue on the same disastrous trajectory. We need to face the inconvenient truths and advance the greater good for everyone, regardless of ethnicity, religion and other dividers. The shortsighted unitary system has bitten us all; it enabled laziness, dependency, and allowed the power elite and their cronies to gather our nuts and shell it for themselves and their families. Across the geopolitical zones, overarching poverty has become a constant and it is now feeding agitations and annoyances across Nigeria under different guises.
It is clear that Governor Wike has studied the Constitution, has good legal advisers and is ready to test the usurpation of the power of the states by the Federal Government. He is set to prove the Yoruba maxim that: the one, who made the vanishing charm for the cockroach, is the same one who made the chance encounter charm for the chicken. Any keen observer of Nigeria would have known that population growth; pressure on limited resources and debt is what will reset our brains. The time has come for the brain reset. The pretend federal structure we are running is not sustainable on the long run. Contestation and negotiation are fundamental to the existence of the nation state. Arrogance cannot quell it. I have written it before that, “Nigeria is a post-colonial state. Its flag and all it stands for defines its constituent parts. The post-colonial state can pretend it is absolute; it is not. People are transcending it, bypassing it, subverting it and renegotiating their existence in it or their exit. The most enduring, is the ethno national model of contestation.”
Governance works according to the wishes of the governed. Throughout history, injustice has been seen to die in the face of resistance and the consent of the oppressed. When resistance rose against Apartheid, it crumbled like a pack of cards. History teaches us that injustice does not last when people rise against it. The consent of the oppressed against injustice is all that is needed. Nigeria is built on lies. Those who love this country must recognize the limit of falsehood and embrace truth. I know it is hard because privilege is hard to give up. But what is the alternative? It is chaos. Trust is objective and a constant.
As they say on the street, Nigeria will think by fire, by force. Every miscalculation based on the old order will move us towards a more just union. Willy-nilly Nigeria will have to embrace true federalism, if it must survive. What we have now is unnatural. Individually or collectively, there is so much joy when you strive to earn your keep, when you get paid according to your efforts, your ideas, your ability to execute plans and render services. Life feels good and tastes good when you eat what you kill.
The easiest way to save Nigeria is to re-adopt the 1963 Republican Constitution, fix what is bad in it and create deliberate safeguards against structural poverty and national underdevelopment. To take the words of Voltaire up a notch: We need to make great, the enemy of good! Our actions cannot run counter to universal laws without grave consequences. Anything in the universe, any framework, any model, that does not follow the course of nature eventually crumbles. You eat what you kill, not what your neighbour kills, unless he hands you his kill, willfully. It is not hard, is it? You cannot break beer bottles in Kano and partake in the proceeds from the sale of alcohol from Lagos. You cannot truncate innovation, stifle recreation, production, entertainment in your State and hope to continue benefitting from taxes derived from such activities in other States. The hypocrisy has gone on for far too long. Fighting to hold on to the last vestiges of privilege is not a strategy at all. It is a loser’s mindset. All unequal privilege must end at some point. Injustice may take a thousand years, but it eventually gives way. It is not just good prose; it is the lesson of history.
POLITICS
FG Generates N33tn Revenue in 10 Months – Oyedele
By Tony Obiechina, Abuja
The Federal Government generated N33tn in revenue between January and October 2026, while about 90 per cent of Nigeria’s data is hosted abroad, highlighting the country’s growing revenue capacity and dependence on foreign digital infrastructure.
The Minister of Finance and Coordinating Minister of the Economy, Taiwo Oyedele, disclosed the figures while delivering the convocation lecture at the University of Uyo, Akwa Ibom State.
In a statement issued on Thursday by his Senior Special Assistant on Communications and Press Secretary, Maryann Duke, Oyedele attributed the record revenue performance partly to improvements in digital tax administration and the introduction of electronic invoicing.
He said the increased use of digital systems had strengthened revenue collection, improved tax compliance and enhanced efficiency across government institutions.
Oyedele, however, raised concerns over Nigeria’s dependence on foreign digital infrastructure, citing estimates from the Nigeria Data Protection Commission that as much as 90 per cent of the country’s data is hosted outside its borders.
He also disclosed, citing Nigerian Communications Commission figures, that Nigeria had recorded more than 157 million active internet subscriptions as of May 2026.
According to him, these connections generate enormous volumes of data through financial transactions, healthcare, education and taxation, creating significant economic opportunities for the country.
He warned that hosting most of this data abroad has implications for foreign exchange expenditure, job creation, technological skills development and Nigeria’s control over information generated by its citizens.
The minister compared the situation to Nigeria’s historical dependence on imported refined petroleum products, cautioning against allowing the country’s data to be processed abroad while digital services are subsequently sold back to Nigerians.
He called for increased investment in local data infrastructure, cybersecurity, technical expertise and predictable regulations to enable Nigerian businesses to capture greater value from the digital economy.
Oyedele stressed that digital sovereignty should not mean technological isolation but should position Nigeria to compete more effectively in international markets.
Addressing graduating students, he urged young Nigerians to move beyond consuming foreign technological products and become developers of solutions that address local and global challenges.
He described artificial intelligence as both a disruptive force and an opportunity for innovation, advising graduates to combine digital skills with critical thinking, creativity, sound judgement and integrity.
The minister also warned that irresponsible online conduct could affect employment opportunities, business relationships and professional credibility, as digital footprints increasingly shape public perception.
He urged universities to strengthen partnerships with government and industry to develop practical solutions in agriculture, energy, healthcare, environmental sustainability and digital services.
According to him, the performance of higher institutions should be measured not only by graduation figures and academic publications but also by businesses established, innovations developed and economic problems solved.
Oyedele outlined five priorities for graduates: continuous learning, value creation, integrity, responsible digital citizenship and active participation in national development.
“Your degree is evidence of what you have learned. Your competence will demonstrate what you can do. Your character will reveal who you truly are,” he told the graduating students.
He urged the graduates to combine innovation with ethical conduct and contribute to building an economy driven by local expertise, productive enterprises and technological advancement.
POLITICS
Court Nullifies Mark-led ADC Leadership, Atiku’s 2027 Candidacy
By David Torough, Abuja
The Federal High Court in Abuja has nullified the leadership of the African Democratic Congress (ADC) led by former Senate President, David Mark, invalidating all decisions taken by the party under its leadership, including the emergence of former Vice-President Atiku Abubakar as its presidential candidate for the 2027 general elections.
The ruling, delivered on Thursday by Justice Peter Lifu, also invalidated the emergence of former Minister of Interior, Rauf Aregbesola, as the party’s National Secretary, the appointments of other national officers and the nominations of candidates for elective positions across the country.
The court further ordered the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC) not to recognise or act on decisions taken at the ADC’s 99th National Executive Committee meeting held on July 27, 2025.
The judgment followed a suit marked FHC/ABJ/CS/1819/2025, instituted by former ADC Deputy National Chairman (North-East), Nafiu Bala Gombe, who challenged the process through which Mark and other members of the caretaker committee assumed control of the party.
Gombe argued that following the resignation of the party’s former National Chairman, Ralph Nwosu, he was constitutionally entitled to take over its leadership. He consequently asked the court to invalidate the actions of the Mark-led leadership and restrain Mark and Aregbesola from parading themselves as National Chairman and National Secretary, respectively.
Upholding the plaintiff’s case, Justice Lifu held that the emergence of the Mark-led leadership violated the ADC constitution, relevant provisions of the Electoral Act and the 1999 Constitution.
Speaking after the judgment, counsel to the plaintiff, Lukman Fagbemi (SAN), said the court had nullified all actions taken by the Mark-led leadership since July 2025.
He explained that INEC had been directed not to recognise or act on decisions taken at the party’s 99th NEC meeting, adding that the court found that the leadership did not emerge through lawful constitutional processes.
Another counsel to the plaintiff, Luka Musa Haruna (SAN), said the judgment effectively left the ADC without candidates for the 2027 elections, including the presidential, governorship, senatorial and House of Representatives contests, as well as state legislative positions.
He recalled that the interlocutory aspect of the dispute had gone to the Supreme Court, which directed that the matter be returned to the Federal High Court for determination of the substantive issues.
The latest ruling, however, has triggered a fresh legal and political confrontation, with Atiku declaring that he would challenge the decision at the Court of Appeal.
In a statement issued on Thursday by the Director of Strategic Communication of the ADC Presidential Campaign Council, Phrank Shaibu, titled ‘The Panic Is Real — Atiku’, the former Vice-President described the judgment as an attempt to weaken the opposition party and frustrate his presidential ambition ahead of the 2027 elections.
Atiku questioned why another suit was instituted against the Mark-led leadership despite an earlier judgment by the same Federal High Court, which he said had affirmed the leadership’s legitimacy.
He cited a judgment delivered on July 2, 2026, by Justice Musa Liman in suit number FHC/ABJ/CS/1637/2025, which he said dismissed a challenge to the Mark-led leadership on grounds relating to jurisdiction, standing and failure to exhaust internal party remedies.
According to him, the latest case amounted to an attempt to circumvent an existing judicial decision.
“Why, after that judgment, was another case filed to reopen the same dispute? This is a calculated attempt to circumvent a subsisting judgment. We will challenge this judicial manoeuvre at the Court of Appeal,” he said.
Atiku also questioned the timing of Thursday’s ruling, which came barely 24 hours after a large crowd attended the ADC campaign rally in Sokoto State.
He alleged that the judgment was intended to undermine the momentum generated by the rally and weaken his political support in Northern Nigeria.
“The timing of this judgment is no coincidence. It is part of a strategy to weaken my support in the North and frustrate a campaign whose message is resonating across the country,” he said.
The former Vice-President maintained that his political ambition was not restricted to Northern Nigeria, arguing that the economic hardship confronting Nigerians had created a national demand for political change.
He said the turnout at the Sokoto rally demonstrated growing support for the ADC’s promise to address the rising cost of living, adding that the campaign would proceed to Kebbi State and other parts of the country.
“My roots are in Northern Nigeria, but my candidacy belongs to all Nigerians. There is a difference between being from the North and being a candidate only for the North. Hunger and hardship do not respect regional boundaries,” he said.
Atiku urged his supporters not to be discouraged by the judgment, insisting that the party’s campaign activities would continue while the legal battle progressed.
He called on party members to remain peaceful, intensify house-to-house mobilisation and sustain the campaign for what he described as an affordable life for Nigerians.
Meanwhile, the ADC has rejected the judgment and indicated its intention to appeal, urging members to remain calm and law-abiding while the party explores available judicial options.
The ruling represents a major setback for the Mark-led faction of the ADC, coming at a critical stage in preparations for the 2027 general elections. Its implications for the party’s leadership, presidential candidacy and other electoral nominations will now be subject to further legal proceedings.
POLITICS
INEC Seeks UN Partnership in Tackling Disinformation on 2027 General Elections
The Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC) has called for the partnership of the United Nations in combating disinformation in the 2027 general elections.
INEC Chairman, Prof. Joash Amupitan, made the call on during a courtesy visit by a United Nations delegation, led by Dr.
Leonardo Santos Simão, Special Representative of the UN Secretary-General for West Africa and the Sahel (UNOWAS), at the commission’s headquarters in Abuja on Wednesday.Amupitan also called for the UN’s partnership in enhancing early warning security monitoring and civic inclusion for women, youth and vulnerable groups in Nigeria.
He identified foreign information manipulation, fake news and targetted electoral disinformation as major emerging threats to democratic processes in West Africa.
“As we deepen our preparations for the 2027 general elections, the commission welcomes continued strategic support and collaborations with the United Nations in several key areas.
“These areas include electoral information integrity and countering disinformation, partnering on rapid response mechanisms and public awareness initiatives to combat foreign information manipulation and interference, the highlighted system manipulations and electoral disinformation.
“One of the greatest challenges to this relation is the issue of disinformation and misinformation, most especially when it has foreign components,” he said.
Amupitan reaffirmed INEC’s commitment to conducting free, fair, credible and transparent elections in 2027, assuring Nigerians that the commission was actively refining its operations to uphold the integrity of the ballot.
He highlighted key institutional reforms, technological updates and voter register cleanup exercises currently underway ahead of the upcoming elections.
The INEC chairman noted that Nigeria’s national voter register currently stands at 103 million, with young voters between the ages of 18 and 34 accounting for nearly 29 per cent of the electorate.
“Using technology, including the Bimodal Voter Accreditation System (BVAS), we have successfully identified and removed over 1.5 million ineligible registrations prior to reaching this 103 million mark.
“The cleanup process is ongoing, with display of the register for claims and objections in accordance with Section 19 of the Electoral Act. The final cleaned register will be published on Dec. 15,” Amupitan said.
The INEC chairman added that the commission was actively distributing permanent voter cards (PVCs) across the nation for new registrants, those who updated their details and voters requesting replacement cards.
To enhance operational efficiency and speed up voter accreditation on Election Day, Amupitan said that the commission had lowered the voter threshold per BVAS device from 1,250 to 800 voters.
He also noted that to build public trust and test technical readiness, INEC planned to conduct nationwide mock accreditation and election exercises prior to the general elections.
“Our objective is to ensure efficient logistics, transparent result management via the INEC Result Viewing Portal (IReV) and timely declaration of results.
“Election should be a source of peace, stability and nation-building,” the chairman said.
In his remarks, the head of the delegation said that the mission was aimed at offering moral and strategic support to Nigeria, as it prepares for the critical polls.
Simão said that given Nigeria’s strategic importance in West Africa, peaceful and successful elections in the country would serve as an inspiration to the entire sub-region.
He emphasised the need for Nigeria to conduct peaceful elections in spite of the diverse views and sentiments involved in any election.
“Elections are always challenging in any country because there are so many views, sentiments and emotions involved.
“Therefore, it is important to manage all of these varieties without putting in danger the peace and stability of the country. Particularly in our case here, the country Nigeria is being affected by terrorism and other sources of violence,” he said.
He said that the Nigeria election should not be another source of violence or burden for the country, another burden for the country, urging INEC to make sure that the elections were peaceful.
“Elections are always challenging because of the varied political sentiments and emotions involved.
“Given that Nigeria is already dealing with security challenges, the election should not be another source of violence or burden for the country,” he said.
Simão added that while the UN delegation would not act as official election observers due to mandate constraints, its presence in the country would continue through the election period to encourage positive behaviours and support peaceful political dialogue among political actors.
“Our objective is to give our contribution for successful elections. We need peaceful elections not only for the benefit of the people of Nigeria, but also of the region.
“Successful elections in Nigeria will be a sort of inspiration to other countries also to follow through. Therefore, the regional integration also happens at this level,” he said.(NAN)


