OPINION
FEMA Has Five Minutes Response Time to Disasters -Abbas Idriss
The Federal Capital Territory Emergency Management Agency ( FEMA) stands out as a frontline disaster management organisation in the country that is matching technology with innovations and competence to produce excellent performance for the benefit of residents.
In this interview with DAILY ASSET Senior Correspondent, Blessing Bature – Akpakpan, Director General of the Agency, Alhaji Abbas Idriss speaks on the organisation’s preparedness to confront the predicted flood and other emergencies in the FCT.
The Nigeria Hydrological Agency has released what one could call a gloom picture of flooding for the remaining part of the year. The report paints a very worrisome picture about the environment especially flooding across the country and of course, FCT is involved, I want you to talk to us about the flooding outlook of 2021?
Actually, if you look at the global world you will realize that the whole environment and the climate has changed. In those countries that we call the developed countries you see the devastating flooding like in Germany, part of China and some other countries, it has been very devastating and Nigeria can not be an exception because we are part of the global world so we have this prediction that we are going to have above normal rainfall this year. The rain is going to be very short but very plenty or heavy and we have started experiencing it like the rainfall in Jalingo last two weeks that resulted in flooding was quantified to be rain that was supposed to fall in two weeks consistently everyday, so with that they could be flooding.
In some areas like FCT, it has also been predicted that we are going to have flooding and two Area Councils are going to be affected like AMAC and Gwagwalada area councils.
The rest will have probable flooding. So the main cause of this is the climate change as well as the global warming, which is also affecting Nigeria. In fact we can not also rule out the way we handle our environment, the way we dump refuge, our tap lining is very poor and so this can also add up to the climate change or effects of the climate change and leads us to certain situations that are really worrisome.
We have three major kinds of flooding; which of them is likely to confront residents in FCT…?
Well the two types of flooding that would likely affect FCT is the Urban flooding and the flash flooding. The Urban flooding has to do with the development that is going on in the city, you know Abuja is a growing city, people are building in the areas that were marked for flood prone areas most times people build on it, the green areas were also been build on by some people illegally so by the time you build on this places you are also blocking the areas that are supposed to allow water to populate and therefore water has to run and in the process of running, it gets stocked somewhere because somebody has blocked the water ways by erecting another structure, dumping refuse there would definitely cause flooding around the area.
The second one is the flash flooding, which is so devastating and also very dangerous to mitigate because it builds up over time and then its more severe and dangerous and can kill instantly.
These are the kinds of flooding that can trap people who are driving on the road or they are just in their houses and see water coming in, before you know it everywhere is filled up to the brim. These are the two flooding that might be experienced in the FCT.
So having received alert or early warning on this, what’s the level of preparedness in terms of response?
Even before we got the warning from the Nigeria Metrological Agency in February, we had already commenced our preparedness. How do we do that, by really seating down to debrief ourselves and look at what happened last year, the previous year, we look at the areas that were flooded and then analyzed the cause of the flooding and also look at the areas that we are anticipating flood, maybe as a result of human activities around the areas then we now carry out structural measures by ensuring that all the relevant MDAs that are supposed to work in those areas really carried out the work they are supposed to do in those areas.
When the early warning as passed by NIMET and the quantity of rainfall expected also we now have to wait for the NISA to come up with the outlook of the flooding.
And when they come out with the outlook of the flooding, the next thing we do was to reconvene the stakeholders meeting to discuss the flood management in the city, where the NIMET, NISA will be there and would give us the real outlook as it affects FCT and then tell us the implications. But before then we have already analyzed the implications of the report of NIMET and NISA, which we advised the FCT administration which was cascaded to all relevant agencies and SDS because we had to look at the implications on road network, rail lines, on agriculture, health and so many others and then we now advised the honourable Minister by way of instruction on what necessary things those SDS should do and especially agric, the kind of crops farmers should grow because of the shorter period rain would fall and the expected period of the amount of rain that is going to fall.
The flood that we can prevent we do so and the ones we can mitigate, we mitigate.
In terms of relief materials, we give less priority to relieve materials, we focus more on prevention rather than reliefs, we work hard to ensure that there’s no casualties, or loss of properties as a result of flooding in the FCT and that’s why our team are always out on monitoring and surveying the areas in the city, to ensure that the water level does not go beyond what we expected and also those areas we feel are threatening lives of the residents especially those slip floods are blocked so that people will not use them and get flash flood build up.
Now lets look at compliance of the residents, you passed the advisory to the FCT Administration, how would you assess the level of compliance in terms of the advisory yoh have rendered, having people to relocate to less flood – prone areas and other requirements to prevent the disaster?
Well, that is the area that we are still battling with the residents of the FCT and maybe because of our culture, people would not want to isolate themselves, they prefer to move to a friend’s house or relation somewhere but definitely there are reasonable levels of compliance by the residents, but where we are having issues are those we call the elites, they don’t want to move an inch from where they are, probably because of the facilities and amenities they enjoy there.
If you look at the history, most people that lost their lives in the FCT are the elites because of their non- compliance to the early warning, like don’t drive in a running water they would go and drive there; don’t build on water ways they would not obey and when flood comes, it carries them away, so these are the issues we have with the residents.
From the previous experience, what were the losses, the level of damage that was experienced in the preceding year…?
The preceding year, we loss about 13 people all over the FCT and it was really a high number because we never expected that, as I said at a go, five people in one family at Giri, were carried away by water and some were trapped as they were driving and then some were carried away because the children went to bath in the river, the water just overwhelmed them and took them away. It was really a sad story for them last year coupled with the COVID-19 that we had, which was part of those hiccups that did not really allow the agency to properly equip themselves.
Also, properties were damaged. So these are the things that we saw and feel that it is too much and we have to put a stop to it because all those things are avoidable things, they are not natural hazards, it was something created by residents by dumping refuse at water ways indiscriminately.
We had a number of disasters recently in some parts of the country and one thing that has continued to resonate is the delay in the intervention by the disaster management agencies like the recent fire disaster at an Abuja Supermarket and the boat mishap that happened in Kebbi, where the locals ended up commencing the rescue activities. As a practitioner can you speak on the issues, why do we suffer delays when we have disasters from the relevant agencies and what are the factors.?
First and foremost is the communication gap, the people don’t communicate on time, most of the time you find out that if there is fire in the city before they can call the fire service they would make an attempt of doing the job of rescue, the people around the houses first make an attempt to extinguish the fire till when they are overwhelmed they call the fire service and when the fire service comes, the youth would now jump on them that they did not come on time, other times this our own response time, which we have agreed is five minutes, if you call us on time wherever you are.
Coming to the locals carrying out rescuing in some areas, in the FCT we encourage them and we equip the locals because we feel they should be the first to respond when we are not available. For instance, considering the distance between here and Abaji, if there is flooding in Abaji and some people were taken by water before we would get there they might have reach the confluence point in Lokoja, but if we have the local divers whom we would call and integrate into our own respond team now in the FCT Emergency Management Agency, we give them the modern training and equip them with modern equipment so that they can carry out rescue. At every point in time we advised them to go in carry out the rescue before we arrive, we have given them the line to call to let us know what is happening before we come.
The training is consistent and even as I’m talking to you in the next few days, we are going to call them and give them brief of the climate situation and also train and give them protective equipment and other equipment they can use to carry out the rescue.
Our response actually is not a problem once we are called on time definitely we would be there within 5 minutes wherever the incidents is.
I’m sure you had a success story on this quick response, can you share.?
Actually we have been commended severally having a quick response, not to take you far away, even yesterday there was a car crash along Kubwa road within a few minutes less than 5minutes we were there, we carry out the rescue without even activating the Federal Road Safety Corps and carried out the victims to the hospital, wrapped them and did the needful, so we don’t have doubt in that, and many people have been commending the way we do our response and to your greater surprise we activate all othet responders quickly and carried out rescue.
Has it been so in the case of fire disasters?
Everything. In fact, where there is fire, we even have a of spread about nine fire stations in FCT and six in the Area Councils and if it is fire, we know which location and which fire station we can call and activate to quickly get there.
The main problem like I said people don’t get to us on time and we have given them the toll free emergency 3 digits number they can reach out – 112. There’s what we call running call.
Fire disaster happened in Gwarinpa and you are running to Asokoro to report meanwhile, all these traffic that is taking from Gwarimpa to Asokoro, the fire will be waiting for you then it will now be our trouble the following day to go Gwarimpa.
Meanwhile, we have toll free number that you can call 24/7 -112 emergency number. You don’t need network and credits any where. Any time you call 112, you will get response not only, fire, anything. It’s any kind of emergency. The people, dispatchers are there so you don’t need to run to the office.
Where there’s a call, its passed to the appropriate desks. You will see dispatcher and with that, we are trying to reduce our response time to 3 minutes, but we are going to do that after putting the navigational equipment in all our vehicles because some times we’ll call to say number so so ADC street, but when we get the number so so ADC street, you will find out that it is number 345 CBD street, so we have to turn and go to that area so that also causes delay.
But our attention now if you go to our websites, we have an App that you activate so that when you call, it will show us the location where you are.
The most important thing is that our drivers need to know the location so we have to put the navigational heads that will take the driver directly to where the incidents are happening.
When you download the App, you will see the distress numbers then you call or even send us pictureS then we move in for rescue.
Can we say that it is for all of these things you received award from FCTA.?
Well, I believe the award was for our wonderful performance during the COVID-19 lockdown, because we were busy not having time of our own in terms of surveying, apart from monitoring, carrying patients to the hospital, we were also involved in the distribution of palliatives and it was really a success story based on that they gave us the award. I assure you that more awards will come to FEMA by the grace of God.
Though we don’t have the applications but very soon we will have the applications and we will tell the general public how to use it and then they can stick to the applications and have no problems.
Our collaboration with stakeholders is fantastic, we don’t have any problems with stakeholders, at any point in time we are in need, we get the necessary things done.
Congratulations for the award and we hope more will come. By the saying that to whom much is given, much is expected do we expect FEMA to extend its portfolio through relief because with the state of affairs in the economy citizens are constantly in the state of emergency not really disasters per say, so can you speak to us about relief distribution because there has been a problem of misappropriation of relief materials, inappropriate distribution methodologies and at times distribution or fake adulterated products to people in distress?
I think its one of the reasons we are not having relief materials as a priority in the agency, like I told you that relief distribution is the last resort.
Our main concern is prevention. Lets prevent what will make people ask for relief material as we are, we don’t keep relief materials and we don’t even have a warehouse but we have profile of our suppliers at any point in time if there’s need for us to take any relief to anybody or any community, we call our suppliers to supply because by international standards you don’t keep food or preserve food for relief materials, that’s when you will have some adulterated items that are contaminated.
You can keep none food for livelihoods items to a warehouse sometimes keeping none food items like cement can also be adulterated so is best you have concrete agreement and MoU with a supplier that at any point in time you call them to come and supply.
Truly there are lots of controversies like you said some get missing on the road that’s why we want to keep off from this type of controversy and strictly focus on disasters prevention and disasters risk prevention.
What are the constraints in the delivery of your mandates?
Our main constraints is fund. If we have funds, we are going to do a lot of things that will surprise the nation not even the FCT because we have people who are really working hard, committed, we have also technology what I mean by technology is that those people who can sit down, they are very creative and can deliver but our main challenge is money finding out that the budget is not adequate to even buy some few equipment that you can use and everyday there are new equipment coming up but most important thing is that we need to protect people who are carrying out the rescue priority.
The second priority is those that we are rescuing.You can’t go to rescue without protecting yourself and there are certain things we are going with for rescue. Like the people we rescued yesterday, is totally different from what has been in the rescuing environment.
We had all the equipment that we can take the rescued to the hospital but most times victims don’t get problems at the point of the incident. It is when people come to rescue that they develop problems that will cause permanent disability, but if we have the equipment that we can wrap someone and then pick him from there, take him to the hospital, the doctor will get him intact.
If there is slight dislocation from hip, the doctor can correct it so if we do the same on all others.
If you see the way they rescue victims in other climes you will say yes, helicopter will just come and pick the person but we are getting there, initially we didn’t even have ambulance we use pickup vans to carry affected persons to the hospital but now we have ambulances fully equipped with oxygen, first aid and paramedics that are following.
Sir what are your non- financial challenges?
The challenges we face is non- compliance by some of the residents about early warning we passed out. This is giving us stress.
Secondly, people don’t obey the instruction of environmental hazards, that you don’t dump refuse indiscriminately and you don’t build indiscriminately and then people violate the code given to them in the city before building structure.
The fire code is been violated as well, people are using non – standard cables in their premises and a sad example of the recent fire incident at Ebeano Super Market, where by it is contrary to the main standard, we have only one access road- entry and exit in the same place. Our truck could not even access the premises to extinguish the fire that was why the fire could not be extinguished within 24hours.
So these are part of those things that are really given us headaches. The major thing is that people don’t obey the Siren.
Anytime the rescue workers are on their way to carryout rescue, the people who were at the other side will come in the middle of the road blocking the road. We have a law in this country that if you obstruct any rescue vehicle, definitely you are going to be sanctioned, but the enforcement of that law is void.
Sir with the issues of compliance, those who violate the safety prescription what is the sanction violators of the law?
You will agree with me that in Nigeria we have laws more than the population but the enforcement of that law is the problem. Simple traffic light laws how are we enforcing it? Nobody is enforcing it.
You can see that if we could put a mobile court on all our streets to ensure that once you are caught, there will be sanction then put cameras as well now that everybody uses NIN on his account, drivers license and so all the data are there so why can’t we put cameras and ensure that people are sanctioned and there are those who are recruited for that purpose?
On your own, you can not stop to carryout your call to embark on rescue to attend to a fire and then you stop to start fighting with someone that blocked your way.
Our own is for us to maneuver and get our way to the scene of the incidents and carryout our work to save lives and properties so those people responsible know themselves and we are calling on them to please ensure the laws are enforced appropriately otherwise we are doing like banana republic.
Analysis
Much Ado About the PBAT Door-to-Door Movement
By Catherine Agbo
In the unfolding drama of Nigerian political discourse, few things excite the commentary circuit quite like a prominent figure stepping decisively into the political arena.
The recent media frenzy surrounding the activities of the High Chief Government Ekpemupolo-led PBAT Door-to-Door Movement is a classic study in selective outrage.
Ekpemupolo, popularly known as Tompolo, is the Grand Patron of the movement.
From editorial columns in national dailies to online commentary, critics have been relentless in dishing out opinions about the group’s activities targeted at mobilising support for President Bola Tinubu’s re-election campaign.
Yet, beneath the righteous indignation lies a fundamental misinterpretation of constitutional rights and democratic principles.
The narratives being spun across several opinion pieces, such as those asking why Tompolo should be actively involved in partisan politics or phoney groups labelling his endorsement as “deceptive,” are all built on shaky foundation.
Critics point to his role as a major security stakeholder in the Niger Delta and argue that a person of his background should remain politically passive or detached from party politics. Others question the deployment of operational vehicles and logistics to coordinators of the movement across states for the campaign, framing legitimate political mobilisation as an overreach.
However, this wave of criticism ignores a fundamental truth, that Nigeria is a constitutional democracy governed by the rule of law.
Section 39 and 40 of the 1999 Constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria (as amended) guarantee every citizen the right to freedom of expression and the right to peaceful assembly and association.
These rights are not reserved exclusively for career politicians, armchair intellectuals, or media commentators, they belong to every Nigerian citizen in equal measure.
Critics who have raised the alarm over campaign spending have also conveniently ignored the provisions of Nigeria’s statutory electoral framework.
The way I see it, High Chief Ekpemupolo has not gone against the Electoral Act 2026 in any way.
The Electoral Act 2026 sets clear financial caps on direct spending by individual candidates and limits on direct monetary donations to political parties or candidates’ accounts.
It also limits the amount a donor can make to a candidate or political party to N500 million.
The Electoral Act 2026 does not, however, specify, mandate, or place any financial spending ceiling for independent third-party support groups, non-governmental movements, or citizen-led mobilisation platforms.
Because the law contains no statutory cap on what an independent group can spend to mobilise voters, logistically equip its coordinators, or advocate for a candidate, Tompolo’s support group operates entirely within the legal limits of the Nigerian electoral law.
To invent non-existent legal infractions simply to tar a political support group is a disingenuous exercise in bad faith.
Tompolo has not been indicted by any court of competent jurisdiction, nor has he violated any law of the land by supporting a presidential candidate of his choice.
He has not been found wanting in any legal measure whatsoever for exercising his democratic suffrage and organising a political support group.
To, therefore, suggest that he should sit on the sidelines while other private citizens and influencers exercise their constitutionally guaranteed right to endorse and fund candidates is to demand a double standard that borders on hypocrisy.
Political association in a democratic society is rooted in choice, conviction, and interest.
If Tompolo believes that the current administration’s policies, particularly in stabilised oil production, maritime security, infrastructure, increased allocation to states, security, especially the State Police bill which 25 state Houses of Assembly have already approved, among others, align with the long-term prosperity of his constituency and the nation, he is within his full constitutional rights to persuade others to share that vision.
Mobilising grassroots support at the ward, household, and polling-unit levels through peaceful door-to-door engagement is the very essence of citizen participation in governance. It is political organising at its most fundamental level.
Those rushing to judge him prematurely are mistaking political enthusiasm for wrongdoing.
A citizen’s choice to donate campaign vehicles, set up organisational structures, and hold political rallies across different geopolitical zones is standard practice in presidential politics globally. In democratic climates, such actions are celebrated as evidence of civic investment and grassroots empowerment. Why should a different standard be constructed when the participant happens to be an influential opinion leader like Tompolo?
The online backlash and critical editorials reveal a deeper prejudice.
Nigeria’s democracy matures when citizens participate freely without fear of unwarranted public trial by the media.
The PBAT Door-to-Door Movement is operating entirely within the boundaries of civil political engagement and statutory electoral law. Rather than attacking the messenger, critics would do well to focus their energy on robust policy debates, engaging the electorate on ideas rather than seeking to curtail the lawful rights of individuals.
Tompolo has broken no law, breached no electoral act provision, and violated no constitutional mandate. He is simply exercising his fundamental right as a free citizen of Nigeria to associate, express his preference, and campaign for the candidate he trusts to lead the country. The misplaced outrage and hasty judgments filling opinion pages ought to be laid to rest.
In a free nation, the right to choose belongs to everyone and Tompolo is no exception.
Agbo, a strategic and development communication expert writes from Abuja.
OPINION
Restoring the Naira as a Store of Value
By Uddin Ifeanyi
Much of the palaver over the recent meeting of the Central Bank of Nigeria’s policy committee was exercised by how well the apex bank is doing its job. Against its primary goal of maintaining price stability, the CBN’s Monetary Policy Committee’s decision to recalibrate its monetary policy rate (MPR) in order to align it with the market invited the most attention.
First, there is the question of what the MPR anchors.
In reality, nothing. Ideally, however, the CBN’s policy rate should transmit price signals through the financial system, influencing saving, borrowing, liquidity, inflation expectations, and in the end, the naira’s exchange rate. It should, in other words, signal the central bank’s intentions. Yet, we have had years in which the MPR stoically remained unchanged even as inflation ran riot, and the naira’s exchange rate came under severe downward pressure.The CBN has regularly papered over this crack with an often-bewildering arsenal of tools — including some eccentric flimflams that it has deployed in recent times. But this only raises further questions as to how useful even these are. Take the cash reserve requirement.
At 45 percent for deposit money banks, it means that nearly half of banks’ qualifying deposits are warehoused with the central bank at any given time. While these sums may not, therefore, be available to build bubbles in the foreign exchange and equity markets, they are not likewise available for lending. Even if we argue that long-term lending ought properly to be funded by equity, banks and not shareholders should bear the burden of financing businesses’ working capital needs. Then, there is the small matter of how the CBN’s cash reserve requirement might be just as orphaned as its policy rate.
Banks raising naira deposits end up paying the CRR tax. In an economy that has witnessed considerable dollarisation — “the process where a country uses a foreign currency (most often the greenback) alongside or completely in place of its own domestic currency” over the years, does it matter that deposits into domiciliary accounts are not CRR compliant? And how?
Might the “dollarisation” phenomenon hold the key to the CBN’s toolkit’s redundancies? Countries formally adopt the dollar in place of their domestic currencies when locals lose faith in the latter. This process restores the stability that struggling economies often find unable to achieve with their currencies and drives investment inflows.
Nigeria’s dollarisation is only partial and barely adjacent. Yet, while the country may not have lost the gains — seigniorage — from printing its own currency that is one consequence of dollarisation, the CBN looks to have partially lost control of the monetary policy space, with the sums that Nigerians increasingly park in their dollar accounts.
There are, thankfully, many ways to regain this control without having to nationalise dollar deposits. Neither the CBN nor the government can talk their way out of this, though. You cannot tell Nigerians to keep their savings in naira while offering them a savings rate below inflation. The smart choice in this circumstance is for domestic economic actors to move their savings into dollars, property, equities, commodities, inventory, or other assets.
Giving Nigerians a reason to save in naira should thus be the central goal of a policy reset. How to do this? We have got to keep inflation low. At 30% year-on-year a while back, the CPI numbers were an outrage. At a little over 15 percent today, it is still doing great injury to the naira. N100 today has roughly the purchasing power of only ₦50 after five years. The solution here goes beyond the CBN setting a credible, explicit medium-term inflation target.
It also transcends the CBN laying out incentive structures that make deviations from this target costly both politically and institutionally. More than this, the national commitment to the CBN not financing fiscal deficits must be religious and total. While this means that monetary policy is no longer subordinate to the federal government’s financing requirements, it must aim at positive real interest rates for savers.
Still a spectre haunts monetary policy in Nigeria. It is unfortunately not in the CBN’s gift to exorcise the nightmare that the federal government’s financing requirements have become.
How do we persuade our public sector boffins that a government that persistently spends more than it can sustainably pay for creates pressure for any of higher taxation, additional borrowing, monetary accommodation, inflation, or the naira’s depreciation? If the naira is only as strong as Nigeria’s balance sheet, then the task of getting both the fiscal and monetary authorities to operate under a common nominal inflation anchor must begin with reducing recurrent expenditure, broadening the tax base instead of increasing the tax rate, returning off-budget borrowing back to the budget, publishing complete fiscal accounts, improving the quality of public investment, establishing a credible medium-term strategy, and ceasing to use the CBN as a piggy bank.
Hopefully, this should help the economy produce more tradable goods and services. Because the naira represents a claim on the economy by anyone holding it, we cannot permanently defend the currency’s exchange rate through interest rates and reserves, if the economy continually uses up more foreign exchange than it earns. In other words, then, the economy must work for the naira to work.
Uddin Ifeanyi, a journalist manqué and retired civil servant, can be reached @IfeanyiUddin.
OPINION
Nigerian Disability; We Sold the Well, Charged for and Withheld the Water
By Prince Charles Dickson Ph.D
There is an old story about a lawyer who sold his well to a teacher, then returned demanding payment for the water inside it. The teacher smiled. If the water still belonged to the lawyer, he replied, perhaps the lawyer should remove it or pay rent for storing it in somebody else’s well.
Suddenly, the lawyer remembered he had only been joking.It is funny until we recognise ourselves as lawyers.
We tell people with disabilities that public spaces belong to everyone. Then we demand an additional price for entering them.
We give them citizenship, but charge for the ramp. We promise education, but make the classroom unreachable. We proclaim equal opportunity, then construct the doorway too narrow for their wheelchair.That contradiction came home to me when Grace shared her story with me, she titled Public Place Accessible Report for Inclusion. It contained no sentimental appeal. It simply insisted that public places should allow everyone to enter, move, communicate, receive services and participate independently, safely and with dignity.
I listened to it in her voice once as a report. Then, I read it again as an indictment.
Behind every line was somebody’s ordinary day made unnecessarily difficult. A mother arrives at a hospital, already frightened for her child, discovering that the entrance has steps but no ramp. A young man preparing carefully for an interview, only to find his opportunity waiting upstairs without a lift. An older woman confronting a pavement that has forgotten her legs cannot move as quickly as they once did.
These are imagined scenes, but the barriers Grace identified are painfully real. Poorly enforced building standards. Toilets that exclude. Transport that humiliates. Signs people cannot read. Public information people cannot hear. Facilities built without consulting those who will need to use them.
Grace’s intervention mattered because she did not reduce accessibility to a construction problem. Her story and experience understood something profound: every inaccessible entrance is also a message. Sometimes it says, “We did not think of you.” Sometimes, more cruelly, it says, “We thought of you, but you were not worth the expense.”
What does that message do to a child’s heart?
Imagine a girl with cerebral palsy watching other children rush into a school assembly while she waits outside for someone to carry her over the steps. Imagine her learning, year after year, that she must be grateful for help rather than entitled to access. Imagine how quietly a society can teach someone to apologise for existing.
On 3 October 2026, at GlowingStar Empowerment Initiative and Development’s World Cerebral Palsy Day commemoration in Bukuru, I delivered a keynote titled Beyond Therapy: Seeing the Whole Person, Not Just the Condition. Its central argument was simple: a person has cerebral palsy; cerebral palsy does not have the person.
A diagnosis is information, not identity. Therapy is necessary, valuable and sometimes life changing. But therapy is supposed to be a bridge into life, not the whole landscape of living. Beyond treatment are friendships, classrooms, jobs, ambitions, relationships, leadership, laughter, choices and dreams that deserve room to breathe.
We can celebrate a child’s progress in therapy while failing that same child at the school gate. We can praise a parent’s devotion while exhausting that parent with inaccessible transport, expensive care and the endless labour of explaining why their child deserves a chance. We can call ourselves compassionate while our architecture remains indifferent. At the commemoration, parents spoke of stigma, costly therapy and limited support. Their courage was unmistakable, but courage should not be the currency families must spend to secure ordinary human rights.
That was why I argued that admission is not inclusion. Allowing a child through the gate means little if the classroom, teaching methods, toilet, playground or attitudes inside still tell that child to remain on the margins.
And communication must never be confused with intelligence. When someone speaks differently or needs more time, our responsibility is neither impatience nor pity. Ask. Then wait. Listen without finishing their sentences. A human voice does not lose its authority because it travels by an unfamiliar route.
I returned to Grace’s story and noticed how practical her demands were: sensible ramps and handrails, usable toilets, safe pathways, accessible transport, clear signage, Braille, captions, audio information and regular audits. It called for architects, officials and contractors to understand universal design, and for people with disabilities themselves to help plan and evaluate the spaces they use.
Nothing about us without us. That principle is not a decorative language for conferences. It is what stops a well-meaning official from installing a ramp that is too steep, or declaring a school inclusive without asking the students to navigate its corridors.
Nigeria has legal commitments against disability discrimination. Yet a law that cannot travel from the statute book to a bus stop, hospital, workplace or classroom remains a promise stranded on paper. Rights should not require influential relatives, public sympathy or a viral photograph before anyone honours them.
Sometimes, as I said in that keynote, society needs therapy. Our buildings need rehabilitation. Our policies need rehabilitation. Our assumptions, professional habits and careless language need rehabilitation. We must stop asking only how a person can adapt to a hostile environment and begin asking why we made that environment hostile.
I keep thinking about Grace, my newfound friend. As she shared recommendations, their moral weight was larger than the suggestions itself. She reminded me that inclusion often begins when someone refuses to look away from what everyone else has learned to step over. It begins with the uncomfortable decision to measure progress not by the elegance of our speeches, but by who can actually enter the room.
The lawyer in the story wanted to sell the well while keeping its water hostage. Too often, our society offers people with disabilities belonging without access, opportunity without accommodation, dignity without choice. Then it calls every concession generosity.
But the water was never ours to withhold.
Every child deserves more than survival. Every caregiver deserves more than exhaustion. Every adult with a disability deserves the freedom to work, love, contribute and belong without performing gratitude for rights already theirs. The purpose of inclusion is not to make people feel fortunate to be tolerated. It is to build a country where nobody must beg to be considered human.
So, Grace, thank you for disturbing our comfort with something as unromantic, and as revolutionary, as sharing your story with me. May we answer it with budgets, redesigned spaces, enforced standards and genuine listening. May the next child approaching a public doorway find no argument waiting there, only an opening.


