The Presidential Initiative on Compressed Natural Gas and Electric Vehicles (Pi-CNG & EV) has warned motorists against the use of cylinders not designed or certified for the storage of CNG.

The Pi-CNG & EV gave the warning in a statement signed by its Head of Brand and Communications, Onyekachi Eke on Monday in Abuja and made available to newsmen.

Eke said she received with concern a report of an ugly incident involving a cylinder fitted to a vehicle at one of the filling stations along Airport Road, Abuja, on Sunday.

 “The driver of the vehicle was subsequently apprehended and is expected to face the full weight of the law for the use of an unauthorised cylinder, which endangered lives and property.

“This incident again highlights the serious danger of using unauthorised cylinders and components for CNG conversion.

Eke noted that a cylinder is not a CNG cylinder simply because it could contain gas adding that improvising with cylinders designed for other uses was against the approved safety guidelines.

“Cylinders designed for other purposes should not be converted, adapted or improvised for the storage of CNG.

The Head of Brand and Communications warned that the use of substandard, fabricated, expired or unapproved cylinders puts vehicle owners, passengers, technicians, station personnel and other members of the public at risk.

Eke called on vehicle owners and commercial operators to use only National Automotive Design and Development Council (NADDC)-accredited conversion centres and SON-certified CNG kits and cylinders.

She urged the Nigerian Midstream and Downstream Petroleum Regulatory Authority (NMDPRA) licensed refuelling station operators to remain vigilant and ensure that appropriate safety and verification procedures were followed before dispensing CNG.

She added that the Pi-CNG & EV would continue to work with its partners and relevant authorities to strengthen compliance, public awareness, and safety across Nigeria’s growing CNG ecosystem.(NAN)

By David Torough, Abuja

The legal battle over the Onise of Ise stool in Lagos State has taken a new turn, with contempt proceedings initiated against Ibrahim Adebowale Saliu, whose installation as the Onise of Ise Kingdom was recently nullified by the Lagos State High Court.

The development follows a September 11, 2026 order by Justice Yetunde Adesola Adesanya in Suit No.

LD/0022PRA/2026, directing the Lagos State Government to withdraw the appointment and recognition granted to Saliu and setting aside his installation and coronation conducted on August 21.

The court also ordered Saliu to stop parading himself or holding himself out as the Onise of Ise pending the hearing and determination of the substantive suit.

The fresh contempt proceedings are contained in documents made available by counsel to the claimants, The Legal Hub Partnership, which represents members of the Okuoye Ruling House, Igbekodo Quarters, Ise Town.

A Form 48 notice dated September 15 was issued against Saliu, warning him of the consequences of alleged disobedience of the court’s orders.

Similar notices were issued to the Lagos State Attorney-General and Commissioner for Justice, Lawal Pedro, SAN; the Special Adviser to the Governor on Rural Development and Chieftaincy Affairs, Dr Nurudeen Yekini Lanre Agbaje; and the Permanent Secretary of the Ministry of Local Government, Chieftaincy Affairs and Rural Development, Mrs Kikelomo Bolarinwa.

The notices relate to the orders made by the court in the ongoing chieftaincy dispute and warn that continued failure to comply could result in contempt proceedings and attendant legal consequences.

In the September 11 ruling, Justice Adesanya had ordered the withdrawal of the instrument of appointment issued to Saliu and nullified the installation and coronation carried out on August 21.

The court further restrained him from presenting himself as the Onise of Ise Kingdom while the substantive case remains pending.

Following the ruling, The Legal Hub Partnership, in a letter dated September 15 and addressed to the Lagos State Government, formally drew the authorities’ attention to the orders and urged compliance.

The law firm specifically asked the government not to recognise Saliu or accord him the official status, rights or privileges attached to the Onise stool unless and until a competent court makes a contrary order.

The latest development stems from a dispute over the process through which Saliu emerged as Onise of Ise.

The claimants, Alhaji Adeniyi Atere, Mrs Idowu Adebisi Lana and Mr Babatunde Ekundayo Lana, instituted the suit for themselves and on behalf of the Okuoye Ruling House.

The September 11 ruling had found that an earlier interim order issued on August 13 had been infringed when the disputed installation proceeded on August 21.

The court consequently granted mandatory orders directing the reversal of the installation and withdrawal of the instruments of office.

However, the court made clear that its orders were interim in nature and would remain in force pending the hearing and determination of the substantive suit.

The underlying dispute over who is legally entitled to occupy the Onise of Ise stool therefore remains before the court, even as the latest contempt proceedings introduce a separate legal issue concerning compliance with its orders.

By Laide Akinboade, Abuja

League of Women Voters
of Nigeria (NILOWV) on Tuesday, tasks the National Assembly on the quick passage of Special Seat bill for women and people with disability.

The President of NILOWV, Hon.

Irene Awunah-Ikyegh, stated this while briefing the media in commemoration of 2026 International day of Democracy, in Abuja.

She lamented that no nation can claim to leave a lasting democratic legacy without it’s commitment to inclusive democracy that include women and people with disabilities.

She there begged NASS not to waste the opportunity but to make history, the opportunity to tell the daughters of
Nigeria that Parliament sees them, the opportunity to tell young women that their political aspirations
are legitimate, the opportunity to strengthen our democracy.

She said, “The Special Seats Bill presents an opportunity to leave a lasting democratic legacy. The question is not
whether Nigerian women are asking for too much. The question is whether Nigeria can continue to
claim that it is committed to inclusive democracy while women remain so dramatically
underrepresented.

“You have the opportunity to make history, the opportunity to tell the daughters of
Nigeria that Parliament sees them, the opportunity to tell young women that their political aspirations
are legitimate, the opportunity to strengthen our democracy. Please, do not waste this opportunity”.

She noted that, “This day is not merely a day for speeches, ceremonies and declarations. It is a day for reflection. It is a day to ask difficult questions. It is a day to examine whether the democracy we practise truly reflects the aspirations of the people. It is a day to ask whether every citizen has a meaningful opportunity to participate. It is a day to ask whether our institutions are working. It is a day to ask whether our political
parties are truly democratic. And, most importantly for us at NILOWV, it is a day to ask whether Nigerian women who constitute approximately half of our population are being given a fair and meaningful opportunity to participate in political leadership and decision-making”.

She lamented, “The final list of National Assembly candidates provides us with a sobering picture. There are 4,408
candidates contesting for seats in the Senate and House of Representatives. Of this number: 3,965 are
men while only 443 are women. Women therefore constitute approximately 10 percent of the candidates, while men constitute approximately 90 percent. This means that, for roughly every one
woman appearing on the National Assembly ballot, there are about nine men.

“These figures are more than statistics they represent the continuing imbalance in access to political power. They tell us that although Nigerian women are participating in the political process, the pathway from participation to actual political power remains extremely difficult and this is where we must
distinguish between participation and representation.

“Women may constitute a large proportion of voters Women may attend political meetings. Women may
mobilise communities. Women may campaign tirelessly. Women may provide food, logistics and
grassroots structures during elections.

“Women may even constitute the majority of volunteers in some
political activities but when it comes to the point at which tickets are allocated, resources are distributed and candidates are selected for elective office, the numbers suddenly collapse.

“That is the problem Women are often visible in political mobilisation but invisible in political power that
is not equality that is not inclusion and that is not the democracy Nigeria should be proud of” .

She decries, “We must humanise these figures. Behind the 443 women on the ballot are hundreds of Nigerian women
who have decided that they are ready to serve but behind the thousands of women who are not on the
ballot are also stories. There is the woman who wanted to contest but could not afford the nomination
and expression-of-interest fees. There is the woman who had the qualifications but lacked the political
godfather.

“There is the woman whose party told her to wait. There is the woman who was encouraged to contest but later discovered that the ticket had already
been informally allocated. There is the woman who was told that she could serve better as a campaign
mobiliser than as a candidate. There is the woman who was warned that politics is too dangerous for
her.

“There is the woman who was threatened. There is the woman who was sexually harassed. There is
the woman who was subjected to online abuse.There is the woman who was told that she was too ambitious. There is the woman whose competence
was questioned simply because she is a woman and there are women who have watched all these
experiences and quietly concluded:
“Perhaps politics is not for people like me.”

She therefore concluded by urging every Nigerian not to give up on democracy, ‘Instead, demand a better democracy.
Democracy belongs to citizens. If we withdraw, others will’.