POLITICS
I Would Love To See Buhari Handcuffed And Made To Pay For His Crimes – Sowore
Nigerian activist and 2023 presidential candidate of the African Action Congress (AAC), Omoyele Sowore, on Wednesday, stated that his greatest joy would be to see the immediate past president, Muhammadu Buhari handcuffed and made to pay for his alleged crimes against humanity.
Sowore said that while former leaders in civilised countries are arrested and prosecuted for their crimes, in Nigeria, they are rewarded with pensions.
The AAC presidential candidate, while speaking at an event to mark the 2023 International Day of the Victims of Enforced Disappearance, in Abuja, submitted that he would love to see Buhari handcuffed and made to pay for all his crimes against Nigerians, either in Nigeria or at the International Criminal Court (ICC).
Citing the case of the former United States president, Donald Trump, who has been charged with different crimes, Sowore noted that “Nigerian leaders who engage in corruption, abuse of human rights, are given red carpet reception every day and every night everywhere, including the one that just left (Buhari).
“The moment he left, the Nigerian government first paid for him to go and do a medical check-up in London instead of putting him on the plane to go to the ICC (International Criminal Court).
“Because the force disappearance we are seeing is small compared to what the Buhari regime did in terms of human rights violation.
“We are not talking about people who were summarily executed, having been labelled as IPOB (Indigenous People of Biafra) members or the 3,000 Shiite members that were killed and buried overnight in Zaria.
“The person who did it, the governor of the state, was about to be made a minister, and he is now a reggae musician because they didn’t make him a minister.
These are grievous crimes, and Nigeria has witnessed too many of these inhuman crimes – degrading treatment and torture of its citizens that we should not be appealing to the government. We should not be appealing to the people who are responsible for committing the crimes.
“Nigeria must reach a level where Nigerian leaders pay for their own crimes – whether they are in office or outside of office.
“I would love one day to see Buhari handcuffed to pay for his crimes, if not in this country, at the International Criminal Court of Justice.”
Speaking further, Sowore stated, “These crimes don’t have a statute of limitations. It doesn’t matter whether you committed force disappearance in 1960 or in 2023; you can be punished for it at any age as long as you are alive.
“It applies to the military, the police officers, the DSS (Department of State Services) or anybody within the Nigerian security agencies.
“The DSS officers behave as if they don’t have names, families and records. We know all of them. If you have been working against the Nigerian people, no matter how long it takes, you must be made to pay for the atrocities you committed against the Nigerian people.
“It is not true that nothing will happen forever. Some of them will start paying for their crimes when they retire.”
POLITICS
Insecurity: Reps Give Marching Orders to Service Chiefs
By Ubong Ukpong, Abuja
The House of Representatives yesterday raised fresh concerns over Nigeria’s worsening security situation, warning that the nation’s service chiefs should consider honourably resigning if they fail to restore public confidence and reverse the tide of insecurity within a reasonable period.
The lawmakers also called on President Bola Tinubu to immediately deploy a comprehensive and aggressive security strategy aimed at dismantling bandit, terrorist and kidnapping networks operating across the country.
The resolution followed the adoption of a motion of urgent public importance moved by Rep.
Ibe Osonwa during plenary. The motion highlighted the rising cases of banditry, mass abductions, attacks on schools and places of worship, and the growing sense of insecurity among Nigerians.Leading the debate, Osonwa lamented the continued targeting of vulnerable communities, educational institutions and worship centres by criminal groups, warning that the situation was disrupting education, deepening poverty and threatening constitutional rights.
The House reminded the Federal Government of its constitutional obligation to protect lives and property, stressing that the security and welfare of citizens remain the primary responsibility of government.
Lawmakers condemned the persistent wave of kidnappings and attacks across the country and resolved to formally appeal to President Tinubu, in his capacity as Commander-in-Chief, to intensify efforts to secure schools, communities and religious centres while ensuring the rescue of citizens held captive by criminal elements.
The House further directed its Committees on Defence, National Security and Intelligence, and the Army to strengthen oversight of security operations and report back within two weeks.
Meanwhile, prominent Islamic cleric, Sheikh Ahmad Gumi, has defended his visit to Ibadan, Oyo State, dismissing allegations that he was promoting the Islamisation of the South-West or advancing northern religious interests in the region.
Responding to criticisms in a social media post, Gumi said his attendance at an Islamic gathering in Ibadan was in his capacity as a representative of the Coalition of Northern Muslim Ulama and not at the invitation of any South-West Muslim group.
The cleric maintained that no individual or organisation could prevent him from travelling to any part of Nigeria, insisting that his constitutional rights entitled him to move freely across the country.
Gumi also linked the controversy surrounding his visit to what he described as growing Islamophobia in parts of the South-West, arguing that his participation in the event had been unnecessarily politicised.
His comments came amid renewed public debate over security and religious issues following reports surrounding the abduction of residents in Oyo State, although one of the victims recently dismissed claims that the kidnappers demanded the introduction of Sharia law as a condition for their release.
The developments underscore growing national concerns over security, social cohesion and the need for stronger government action to address the challenges confronting the country.
POLITICS
State Police Debate: Adebayo’s Four-Year-Old Position Resonates
By Mike Odiakose, Abuja
As Nigeria moves closer to renewed constitutional conversations around the creation of state police, comments made about four years ago by former Social Democratic Party (SDP) presidential candidate, Prince Adewole Adebayo, are drawing fresh relevance.
In an interview conducted during the build-up to the 2023 presidential election, Adebayo strongly defended the creation of state and local government policing, arguing that Nigeria’s highly centralised security structure had become ineffective and disconnected from local realities.
According to him, any level of government empowered to make laws should also possess the authority to enforce them.
He argued that it was contradictory for states to legislate on issues including criminal offences, sanitation, public order and local administration while depending almost entirely on a centrally controlled police system headquartered in Abuja.
Adebayo maintained that most offences affecting everyday life — including murder, theft, arson and other serious crimes — are prosecuted under state laws, raising questions about why states have little operational control over policing.
Using Lagos as an example, he questioned situations where incidents occurring entirely within a state still require intervention and decisions from federal authorities.
He said such arrangements weaken accountability and delay justice.
The former presidential candidate also called for wider police reforms beyond decentralisation, arguing that policing in Nigeria should move away from what he described as a culture of force toward one rooted in public service and community trust.
According to him, police should belong to the people rather than function as an extension of government power.
He further proposed stronger institutional links between policing and the justice system, including reforms that would reinforce the role of legal institutions in ensuring accountability.
Beyond security, Adebayo linked Nigeria’s security challenges to broader failures in economic governance.
He rejected arguments that Nigeria’s fiscal problems stem primarily from insufficient taxation, insisting instead that the country loses substantial revenue through leakages, resource theft and weak administration.
He argued that government should prioritise recovering legally due revenues rather than imposing additional tax burdens on citizens and businesses.
Adebayo pointed to crude oil theft and illegal extraction of solid minerals as examples of areas where stronger governance could significantly improve national income.
He also criticised arbitrary tax practices, warning that unrealistic assessments discourage productivity and encourage corruption.
According to him, economic recovery requires efficient revenue collection, transparent administration and stronger protection of public resources.
While the interview was held years ago, many of the issues raised — particularly around decentralised policing, insecurity and economic management — remain central to Nigeria’s ongoing governance debate.
With discussions on state police once again gaining policy attention, Adebayo’s earlier arguments are returning to public conversation as part of wider calls for security and structural reforms.
POLITICS
Labour Party Drags INEC to Court over Enugu North By-election
From Sylvia Udegbunam, Enugu and Yagana Ali, Yola
Political activities intensified across the country on Monday as the Labour Party challenged its exclusion from the forthcoming Enugu North Senatorial District by-election in court, while electoral authorities in Adamawa State confirmed preparations for local government elections involving 11 political parties.
The Labour Party filed a suit at the Federal High Court in Abuja against the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC), alleging wrongful exclusion from the June 20, 2026 Enugu North Senatorial District by-election.
The seat became vacant following the death of Senator Okey Ezea in November 2025.
According to the party, it duly notified INEC of its intention to conduct a primary election, which was held on May 25 and produced Ambassador Simon Ejike Eze as its candidate. However, the party claimed it was denied access to the commission’s nomination portal for the submission of its candidate’s details despite complying with stipulated electoral requirements.
In a statement issued by its National Publicity Secretary, Ken Asogwa, the party attributed the development to alleged administrative lapses by INEC officials in Enugu State, including the failure to transmit reports of the primary election.
The party maintained that it fulfilled all legal obligations under the Electoral Act and INEC guidelines and described its exclusion from the contest as unjust. It also called for an investigation into the conduct of the commission’s officials in the state while expressing confidence that the judiciary would ensure justice.
Meanwhile, preparations have reached an advanced stage for Saturday’s local government elections in Adamawa State, with 11 political parties set to participate in the exercise.
The Commissioner in charge of Logistics and Field Operations at the Adamawa State Independent Electoral Commission (ADSIEC), Emmanuel Abba, said all sensitive and non-sensitive election materials had been secured and would be distributed to the 21 local government areas before the poll.
Abba also disclosed that security agencies had assured the commission of adequate protection for electoral personnel, voters and election materials, adding that the commission remained committed to conducting a peaceful and credible election.
He noted that while the commission would heed security advice in areas of concern, it was fully prepared for the exercise.
The developments underscore heightened electoral activities across the country as political parties and election management bodies navigate preparations and disputes ahead of crucial polls.


