NEWS
INEC and Imo North Senatorial Bye-Election Fallouts

By Oseloka Zikora Abuja
The Imo North Senatorial Bye-Election has witnessed a lot of drama, especially in terms of who the candidate of the All Progressives Congress (APC) really is. Various APC aspirants have gone to the courts seeking to settle the dust raised by the contentious primary election of the party that remains mired in controversy.
Unfortunately, instead of the courts dousing the fire, they seemed to have put more logs in the hearth.
At the heart of the inferno are two conflicting court judgements that have left the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC) confused on who to return as the Senator-elect for the zone.This indecisive action on the part of INEC has led to several speculations and spins of false narratives, leaving the Imo North electorate and many political watchers in limbo.
While the APC hierarchy insists that Sir Frank Ibezim remains the party’s bonafide candidate for the election and therefore the Senator-elect, the camp of Senator Ifeanyi Ararume is claiming the mandate given to APC on the basis of a Federal High Court Abuja judgement disqualifying Ibezim.
However, Ibezim’s supporters are pointing to the Federal Court of Appeal judgement reinstating him as the authentic APC candidate.
The Peoples Democratic Party (PDP), on the other hand, is asking INEC to declare its candidate, who came second in the election, winner, while arguing that by virtue of the conflicting court judgements, the APC did not have a candidate in the election.
In considering the conflicting claims, it is imperative to sift through the melee and bring out the facts of the matter. First, let’s examine the contention of some of the aspirants who contested the Imo North APC primary.
At the crux of the controversy is the claim that Sir Frank Ibezim was disqualified from contesting the party’s primary by the Screening Committee.
APC has however countered this claim by insisting that the Screening Committee was an ad hoc Committee with no authority to disqualify any aspirant; and that the party’s constitution hands such power to the National Working Committee, in a role now performed by the Governor Mai Mala Buni-led Caretaker Committee and Extra-Ordinary Convention Planning Committee.
Some documents sighted indicate that the Caretaker Committee discountenanced the recommendations of the Screening Committee and gave the greenlight to all the aspirants to contest the primary election.
As such, the argument that Sir Frank Ibezim did not contest and win the APC Imo North Bye-Election party primary does not hold water.
The real challenge for Ibezim, however, was that his main challenger, Senator Ifeanyi Ararume, had laid some judicial landmines for him. Ararume had scored a hat trick with a controversial judgement by the Federal High Court Owerri, mandating INEC to replace Ibezim’s name with that of Ararume. Matters were made somewhat tricky for Ibezim with another controversial judgement by Justice Inyang Ekwo, disqualifying him from contesting on the eve of the election.
Yet, good fortune smiled on him later the same day when a three-member Federal Court Appeal Panel quashed the Federal High Court Owerri judgement, and directed INEC to reinstate him on the ballot.
Perhaps that’s where the macabre dance got more perplexing for the umpire.
All the court cases involving the APC candidate would have become an academic exercise but for the fact that APC won the December 5 bye-election,, thereby throwing INEC into a dilemma on who to return as the duly elected senator for Imo North.
Legal pundits however say that INEC’s position in not returning Ibezim is untenable, as he remains the only candidate of the APC who can claim to have participated in all the stages of the election.
According to the fourth alteration to the 1999 Nigerian Constitution, amending portions of Section 185, “An election tribunal or court shall not declare any person a winner at an election in which such a person has not fully participated in all stages of the election.”
To this school of thought, Ararume’s candidature expired the moment the Federal Court of Appeal took him off the ballot. The claim by INEC commissioner, Mr. Festus Okoye that Ararume is still in contention by virtue that he had filed a notice of Appeal against the Appeal Court judgement before the election date is moot.
It is trite law that a mere notice of appeal does not stay the execution of a subsisting judgement.
Ibezim therefore remains the only candidate that can rescue the APC mandate. Although the Federal High Court Abuja disqualified him from contesting on the eve of the election, Ibezim’s reprieve lay in the fact that a superior Court of Appeal reinstated him on the ballot hours later. Although some counter that the Court of Appeal did not address the issue of qualification while reinstating Ibezim.
Be that as it may, INEC remains duty bound to obey the superior court’s order as that was the last judicial pronouncement on Ibezim’s candidature. If INEC so wishes, it can then approach the courts for further clarifications on the issue.
That though may not be necessary, given that Ibezim is already in the Appeal Court challenging the issue in question.
Nevertheless, since these are pre-election court matters, which final adjudication usually end in the Supreme Court, INEC in the meantime has no option but to follow the law and return Ibezim as the Senator-elect for Imo North.
This is because there can only be two outcomes from the current impasse. One outcome is that Ibezim quashes the lower court’s judgement against him at the remaining levels of adjudication, and thus retains his status as winner of the bye-election. Conversely, he fails to discharge the judgement, which is rather unlikely, and in that case the PDP candidate who came second benefits from such a misfortune.
Neither of the scenarios will benefit Ararume simply because the Supreme Court’s power to declare him the winner is ousted by the section 185 amendment provided in the fourth Alteration to the 1999 Constitution.
So, how will the impasse play out? I am not a prophet but from all evidence concerning Ibezim’s qualification to contest for the Senate, he will no doubt get sworn into the red chamber to finish the term which became vacant following the demise of Senator Benjamin Uwajumogu.
Why I predict so is because the presumed Senator-elect, Ibezim, has all the requisite qualifications to contest. That is, perhaps, the reason why his party was confident in presenting him as its candidate.
Foreign News
NiDO-Worldwide Appoints New Coordinating Chairman

The Nigerians in Diaspora Organisation (NiDO)-Worldwide has appointed Mr Chibuzo Ubochi, as its new Coordinating Chairman of NIDO-Europe.
Ubochi succeeds Dr Victor Ubani, the Chairman of NIDO Americas and outgoing coordinating chairman of NiDO-Worldwide.
Ubani disclosed this in a statement issued on Tuesday, against backdrop of the end of his tenure as coordinating chairman and inauguration of Ubochi’s tenure as the new chairman of the organisation.
He congratulated Ubochi over his recent electoral victory where he emerged chairman of the organisation, saying it was a closely contested NIDO-Europe election against Dr Johnson Odibo.
According to him, the process which was conducted with robust participation, ushered in a new era for NIDO-Europe.
Ubani said: “It is one marked by renewed strength, unity and purpose. I write in my capacity as the outgoing Coordinating Chairman of NIDO-Worldwide, having had the honour of serving in this rotational role on behalf of the Americas.
“I am deeply grateful for the cooperation and commitment demonstrated by our continental bodies throughout my tenure.
“Together, we pursued the vision of a more effective, united and relevant NIDO across all regions. I believe we made notable progress in advancing our collective mandates.
“As is the custom within our global structure, which comprises five continental bodies, I will now be handing over the rotational leadership of the Coordinating Chairmanship to the current Chairman of NIDO Europe, Sir Chibuzo Ubochi”.
Ubani explained that he had observed Ubochi’s leadership as Chairman of NIDO UK South and his previous tenure as Legal Adviser to the NIDO-Worldwide Coordinating Platform, to express confidence in the latter’s ability to lead the organisation.
“I am confident in his capacity to fulfill this responsibility with vision, integrity and diplomatic skill.
“He is well acquainted with the complexities of our global structure and is well-positioned to continue strengthening and advancing a more focused and impactful NIDO Worldwide.
“As he assumes this role, I urge all continental chairs, executives and members to extend the same cooperation and collegiality accorded me to him.
“The task ahead requires a united front, focused energy and shared commitment free from unnecessary distractions and geared solely toward the progress of our global diaspora, and the development of our homeland,” he said. (NAN)
NEWS
Man Docked over Alleged Stealing of Excavator Worth N25 Million

A 33-year old man, Alaba Oladepo, was on Tuesday, arraigned before an Iyaganku Chief Magistrates’ Court, over alleged stealing of a Caterpillar excavator valued N25 million.Oladepo, whose address was not given, is being charged with conspiracy and stealing, to which he pleaded not guilty.
The Prosecutor, Insp Sikiru Opaleye, told the court that the defendant committed the offence in Nov. 2024, at the Moniya area of Ibadan. Opaleye said that Oladepo stole a D8 Caterpillar excavator valued N25 million, belonging to Olumide Bamidele.The prosecutor said that the offence contravened Section 383 and 390(9) of the Criminal Code Laws of Oyo State, 2000.The Chief Magistrate, Mrs Olabisi Ogunkanmi, admitted the defendant to bail in the sum of N10 million, with two sureties in like sum.Ogunkanmi said that one of the sureties must be a landed property owner, and that the other must be a blood relation of the defendant.She adjourned the matter to Sept. 2, for hearing.(NAN)NEWS
Zelensky Wants Pressure on Russia after New Wave of Air Attacks

Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky is calling for more international pressure to be placed on Moscow following another night of heavy Russian air attacks on the Ukrainian capital.“Today is one of the largest attacks on Kiev. Odesa, Dnipro region, and Chernihiv region were also targeted,’’ he wrote on the X platform.
These airstrikes had drowned out all efforts by the U. S. and other countries to achieve peace, he said.Zelensky called on the U.S., Europe “and others around the world who called for an end to the war’’ to take action.The response to such Russian attacks must not be silence, he said.There were fires in the capital with a number of buildings destroyed, and there were several injuries, he said.The port city of Odessa was also hit hard, with two people killed and at least 10 others were injured after a drone strike, Mayor Gennadiy Trukhanov wrote on Telegram.The Ukrainian Air Force says Russia attacked its neighbour with 315 drones and drone dummies, two North Korean ballistic missiles and five cruise missiles.It said that 284 targets were destroyed, including all missiles and cruise missiles.In the Russian border region of Belgorod, a woman was killed in a Ukrainian drone attack, according to Governor Vyacheslav Gladkov.There were also reports of injuries.The Russian Defence Ministry reported that 102 Ukrainian drones were shot down over several Russian territories and the Black Sea peninsula of Crimea, which was annexed in 2014.The information provided by the warring parties cannot be independently verified.According to Russian media reports, one of the targets was a drone factory near the city of Yelabuga in the republic of Tatarstan.Russia’s aviation authority placed temporary restrictions on take-offs and landings at 13 airports during Monday night and Tuesday morning, including the airports of Moscow and St. Petersburg. (dpa/NAN)