NEWS
Nigeria’s Inflation Rate Increases to 33.88% in October- NBS
The National Bureau of Statistics (NBS), says Nigeria’s headline inflation rate increased 33.88 per cent in October 2024.The NBS disclosed this in its Consumer Price Index (CPI) and Inflation Report for October 2024, which was released in Abuja on Friday.
According to the report, the figure is 1.18 per cent points higher compared to the 32. 70 per cent recorded in September 2024. It said on a year-on-year basis, the headline inflation rate in October 2024 was 6.55 per cent higher than the rate recorded in October 2023 at 27.33 per cent.In addition, the report said on a month-on-month basis, the headline inflation rate in October 2024 was 2.64 per cent, which was 0.12 per cent higher than the rate recorded in September 2024 at 2.52 per cent.“This means that in October 2024, the rate of increase in the average price level was higher than the rate of increase in the average price level in September 2024.”The report said the increase in the headline index for October 2024 on a year-on-year and month-on-month basis was attributed to the increase in some items in the basket of goods and services at the divisional level.It said these increases were observed in food and non-alcoholic beverages, housing, water, electricity, gas, and other fuel, clothing and footwear, transport and furnishings, household equipment and maintenance.Others include education, health, and miscellaneous goods and services, restaurants and hotels, alcoholic beverages, tobacco and kola, recreation and culture, and communication.It said the percentage change in the average CPI for the 12 months ending October 2024 over the average CPI for the previous 12 months was 32.26 per cent.“This indicates an 8.82 per cent increase compared to 23.44 per cent recorded in October 2023.”The report said the food inflation rate in October 2024 increased to 39.16 per cent on a year-on-year basis, which was 7.64 per cent higher compared to the rate recorded in October 2023 at 31.52 per cent.“The rise in food inflation on a year-on-year basis is caused by increases in prices of guinea corn, rice, maize grains, beans, yam, water yam, and CocoYam.“Others are palm oil, vegetable oil, Lipton, Milo, and Bournvita, among others.”It said on a month-on-month basis, the food inflation rate in October was 2.94 per cent, which was a 0.30 per cent increase compared to the rate recorded in September 2024 at 2.64 per cent.“The increase in food inflation on a month-on-month basis was caused by an increase in the average prices of palm oil, vegetable oil, mudfish, croaker, fresh fish, dried beef, goat meat, mutton, and skin meat.“Others are bread, guinea corn flour, plantain flour, rice, among others.”The report said that “all items less farm produce and energy’’ or core inflation, which excludes the prices of volatile agricultural produce and energy, stood at 28.37 per cent in October on a year-on-year basis.“This increased by 5.79 per cent compared to 22.58 per cent recorded in October 2023.“The exclusion of the PMS is due to the deregulation of the commodity by removal of subsidy.”It said the highest increases were recorded in prices of bus Journey within the city, Journey by motorcycle, and bus journey intercity among others.“Others are rents, meal at a local Restaurant, hair cut service, woman hair brush, women’s hairdressing, among others.”The NBS said on a month-on-month basis, the core inflation rate was 2.14 per cent in October 2024.“This indicates a 0.04 per cent increase compared to what was recorded in September 2024 at 2.10 per cent.“The average 12-month annual inflation rate was 26.12 per cent for the 12 months ending October 2024; this was 6.14 per cent points higher than the 19.98 per cent recorded in October 2023.”The report said on a year-on-year basis in October 2024, the urban inflation rate was 36.38 per cent, which was 7.09 per cent higher compared to the 29.29 per cent recorded in October 2023.“On a month-on-month basis, the urban inflation rate was 2.75 per cent, which increased by 0.08 per cent compared to September 2024 at 2.67 per cent.’’The report said on a year-on-year basis in October, the rural inflation rate was 31.59 per cent, which was 6.01 per cent higher compared to the 25.58 per cent recorded in October 2023.“On a month-on-month basis, the rural inflation rate was 2.53 per cent, which increased by 0.14 per cent compared to September 2024 at 2.39 per cent.’’On states’ profile analysis, the report showed that in October, all items’ inflation rate on a year-on-year basis was highest in Bauchi at 46.68 per cent, followed by Kebbi at 40.02per cent, and Sokoto at 39.65 per cent.It, however, said the slowest rise in headline inflation on a year-on-year basis was recorded in Delta at 27.85 per cent, followed by Benue at 28.22 per cent, and Katsina at 29.59 per cent.The report, however, said in October 2024, all items inflation rate on a month-on-month basis was highest in Kano at 3.77 per cent, followed by Bauchi at 3.74 per cent, and Anambra at 3.59 per cent.“Kwara at 1.27 per cent, followed by Ondo at 1.49 per cent and Lagos at 1.91 per cent recorded the slowest rise in month-on-month inflation.”The report said on a year-on-year basis, food inflation was highest in Sokoto at 52.18 per cent, followed by Edo at 46.55 per cent, and Borno at 45.85 per cent.“Kwara at 31.68 per cent, followed by Kogi at 33.30 per cent and Rivers at 33.87 per cent recorded the slowest rise in food inflation on a year-on-year basis.’’The report, however, said on a month-on-month basis, food inflation was highest in Adamawa at 5.08 per cent, followed by Sokoto at 4.86 per cent, and Yobe at 4.34 per cent.“Kwara at 1.11 per cent, followed by Ondo at 1.31 per cent and Kogi at 1.50 per cent, recorded the slowest rise in inflation on a month-on-month basis.” (NAN)NEWS
Abuja Court Dismisses Age Falsification Case Against Senior Police Officers
Justice Yusuf Haliru of the Federal Capital Territory,( FCT) High Court Abuja, has dismissed a case brought against some senior police officers in which they were accused of age falsification.
In a landmark judgment Monday, the Vourt ruled that the prosecution failed to establish a sustainable case against the officers adding that the criminal allegations against the senior police officers were simply malicious.
The former Inspector General of Police, Kayode Egbetokun,had instituted the case againt the accused officers, against retired Assistant Inspector-General of Police Idowu Owohunwa, retired Commissioner of Police Benneth Igweh, retired Commissioner of Police Ukachi Peter Opara, retired Deputy Commissioner of Police Obo Ukam Obo, and retired Assistant Commissioner of Police Simon A.
Lough (SAN).The officers were arraigned on a 14-count charge over alleged falsification of their ages and official police records.
In his judgment however, Justice Halilu dismissed all the charges, and held that the prosecution failed to establish a sustainable basis for the criminal case against the retired officers.
The judge further ruled that the circumstances surrounding the prosecution suggested that the charges were instituted out of malice, particularly as several courts had already dismissed similar cases involving other police officers, with some of those decisions affirmed by the Court of Appeal.
Consequently, rhe Judge discharged the defendants, bringing to an end the case.
In February 2025, the IGP had asked the officers to face disciplinary committee for either overstaying 35 years of service or failure to retire on attainment of 60 years of age.
It was reported then that the accused officers threatened then-Inspector-General of Police Egbetokun, to retire alongside them because he had also exceeded the statutory retirement threshold.
Egbetokun had directed the officers to appear before the Force Disciplinary Committee between February 10 and February 13, 2025.
The officers, however, reportedly maintained that Egbetokun lacked the legal authority to discipline or retire them because, according to them, he had himself passed his official retirement date of September 4, 2024, and remained in office only after President Bola Tinubu approved his tenure elongation.Abuja Court Dismisses Age Falsification Case Against Senior Police Officers
Justice Yusuf Haliru of the Federal Capital Territory,( FCT) High Court Abuja, has dismissed a case brought against some senior police officers in which they were accused of age falsification.
In a landmark judgment Monday, the Vourt ruled that the prosecution failed to establish a sustainable case against the officers adding that the criminal allegations against the senior police officers were simply malicious.
The former Inspector General of Police, Kayode Egbetokun,had instituted the case againt the accused officers, against retired Assistant Inspector-General of Police Idowu Owohunwa, retired Commissioner of Police Benneth Igweh, retired Commissioner of Police Ukachi Peter Opara, retired Deputy Commissioner of Police Obo Ukam Obo, and retired Assistant Commissioner of Police Simon A. Lough (SAN).
The officers were arraigned on a 14-count charge over alleged falsification of their ages and official police records.
In his judgment however, Justice Halilu dismissed all the charges, and held that the prosecution failed to establish a sustainable basis for the criminal case against the retired officers.
The judge further ruled that the circumstances surrounding the prosecution suggested that the charges were instituted out of malice, particularly as several courts had already dismissed similar cases involving other police officers, with some of those decisions affirmed by the Court of Appeal.
Consequently, rhe Judge discharged the defendants, bringing to an end the case.
In February 2025, the IGP had asked the officers to face disciplinary committee for either overstaying 35 years of service or failure to retire on attainment of 60 years of age.
It was reported then that the accused officers threatened then-Inspector-General of Police Egbetokun, to retire alongside them because he had also exceeded the statutory retirement threshold.
Egbetokun had directed the officers to appear before the Force Disciplinary Committee between February 10 and February 13, 2025.
The officers, however, reportedly maintained that Egbetokun lacked the legal authority to discipline or retire them because, according to them, he had himself passed his official retirement date of September 4, 2024, and remained in office only after President Bola Tinubu approved his tenure elongation.Abuja Court Dismisses Age Falsification Case Against Senior Police Officers
Justice Yusuf Haliru of the Federal Capital Territory,( FCT) High Court Abuja, has dismissed a case brought against some senior police officers in which they were accused of age falsification.
In a landmark judgment Monday, the Vourt ruled that the prosecution failed to establish a sustainable case against the officers adding that the criminal allegations against the senior police officers were simply malicious.
The former Inspector General of Police, Kayode Egbetokun,had instituted the case againt the accused officers, against retired Assistant Inspector-General of Police Idowu Owohunwa, retired Commissioner of Police Benneth Igweh, retired Commissioner of Police Ukachi Peter Opara, retired Deputy Commissioner of Police Obo Ukam Obo, and retired Assistant Commissioner of Police Simon A. Lough (SAN).
The officers were arraigned on a 14-count charge over alleged falsification of their ages and official police records.
In his judgment however, Justice Halilu dismissed all the charges, and held that the prosecution failed to establish a sustainable basis for the criminal case against the retired officers.
The judge further ruled that the circumstances surrounding the prosecution suggested that the charges were instituted out of malice, particularly as several courts had already dismissed similar cases involving other police officers, with some of those decisions affirmed by the Court of Appeal.
Consequently, rhe Judge discharged the defendants, bringing to an end the case.
In February 2025, the IGP had asked the officers to face disciplinary committee for either overstaying 35 years of service or failure to retire on attainment of 60 years of age.
It was reported then that the accused officers threatened then-Inspector-General of Police Egbetokun, to retire alongside them because he had also exceeded the statutory retirement threshold.
Egbetokun had directed the officers to appear before the Force Disciplinary Committee between February 10 and February 13, 2025.
The officers, however, reportedly maintained that Egbetokun lacked the legal authority to discipline or retire them because, according to them, he had himself passed his official retirement date of September 4, 2024, and remained in office only after President Bola Tinubu approved his tenure elongation.Abuja Court Dismisses Age Falsification Case Against Senior Police Officers
Justice Yusuf Haliru of the Federal Capital Territory,( FCT) High Court Abuja, has dismissed a case brought against some senior police officers in which they were accused of age falsification.
In a landmark judgment Monday, the Vourt ruled that the prosecution failed to establish a sustainable case against the officers adding that the criminal allegations against the senior police officers were simply malicious.
The former Inspector General of Police, Kayode Egbetokun,had instituted the case againt the accused officers, against retired Assistant Inspector-General of Police Idowu Owohunwa, retired Commissioner of Police Benneth Igweh, retired Commissioner of Police Ukachi Peter Opara, retired Deputy Commissioner of Police Obo Ukam Obo, and retired Assistant Commissioner of Police Simon A. Lough (SAN).
The officers were arraigned on a 14-count charge over alleged falsification of their ages and official police records.
In his judgment however, Justice Halilu dismissed all the charges, and held that the prosecution failed to establish a sustainable basis for the criminal case against the retired officers.
The judge further ruled that the circumstances surrounding the prosecution suggested that the charges were instituted out of malice, particularly as several courts had already dismissed similar cases involving other police officers, with some of those decisions affirmed by the Court of Appeal.
Consequently, rhe Judge discharged the defendants, bringing to an end the case.
In February 2025, the IGP had asked the officers to face disciplinary committee for either overstaying 35 years of service or failure to retire on attainment of 60 years of age.
It was reported then that the accused officers threatened then-Inspector-General of Police Egbetokun, to retire alongside them because he had also exceeded the statutory retirement threshold.
Egbetokun had directed the officers to appear before the Force Disciplinary Committee between February 10 and February 13, 2025.
The officers, however, reportedly maintained that Egbetokun lacked the legal authority to discipline or retire them because, according to them, he had himself passed his official retirement date of September 4, 2024, and remained in office only after President Bola Tinubu approved his tenure elongation.VVVVVVVVVVVVVVVAbuja Court Dismisses Age Falsification Case Against Senior Police Officers
Justice Yusuf Haliru of the Federal Capital Territory,( FCT) High Court Abuja, has dismissed a case brought against some senior police officers in which they were accused of age falsification.
In a landmark judgment Monday, the Vourt ruled that the prosecution failed to establish a sustainable case against the officers adding that the criminal allegations against the senior police officers were simply malicious.
The former Inspector General of Police, Kayode Egbetokun,had instituted the case againt the accused officers, against retired Assistant Inspector-General of Police Idowu Owohunwa, retired Commissioner of Police Benneth Igweh, retired Commissioner of Police Ukachi Peter Opara, retired Deputy Commissioner of Police Obo Ukam Obo, and retired Assistant Commissioner of Police Simon A. Lough (SAN).
The officers were arraigned on a 14-count charge over alleged falsification of their ages and official police records.
In his judgment however, Justice Halilu dismissed all the charges, and held that the prosecution failed to establish a sustainable basis for the criminal case against the retired officers.
The judge further ruled that the circumstances surrounding the prosecution suggested that the charges were instituted out of malice, particularly as several courts had already dismissed similar cases involving other police officers, with some of those decisions affirmed by the Court of Appeal.
Consequently, the Judge discharged the defendants, bringing to an end the case.
In February 2025, the IGP had asked the officers to face disciplinary committee for either overstaying 35 years of service or failure to retire on attainment of 60 years of age.
It was reported then that the accused officers threatened then-Inspector-General of Police Egbetokun, to retire alongside them because he had also exceeded the statutory retirement threshold.
Egbetokun had directed the officers to appear before the Force Disciplinary Committee between February 10 and February 13, 2025.
The officers, however, reportedly maintained that Egbetokun lacked the legal authority to discipline or retire them because, according to them, he had himself passed his official retirement date of September 4, 2024, and remained in office only after President Bola Tinubu approved his tenure elongation.Justice Yusuf Haliru of the Federal Capital Territory,( FCT) High Court Abuja, has dismissed a case brought against some senior police officers in which they were accused of age falsification.
In a landmark judgment Monday, the Vourt ruled that the prosecution failed to establish a sustainable case against the officers adding that the criminal allegations against the senior police officers were simply malicious.
The former Inspector General of Police, Kayode Egbetokun,had instituted the case againt the accused officers, against retired Assistant Inspector-General of Police Idowu Owohunwa, retired Commissioner of Police Benneth Igweh, retired Commissioner of Police Ukachi Peter Opara, retired Deputy Commissioner of Police Obo Ukam Obo, and retired Assistant Commissioner of Police Simon A. Lough (SAN).
The officers were arraigned on a 14-count charge over alleged falsification of their ages and official police records.
In his judgment however, Justice Halilu dismissed all the charges, and held that the prosecution failed to establish a sustainable basis for the criminal case against the retired officers.
The judge further ruled that the circumstances surrounding the prosecution suggested that the charges were instituted out of malice, particularly as several courts had already dismissed similar cases involving other police officers, with some of those decisions affirmed by the Court of Appeal.
Consequently, rhe Judge discharged the defendants, bringing to an end the case.
In February 2025, the IGP had asked the officers to face disciplinary committee for either overstaying 35 years of service or failure to retire on attainment of 60 years of age.
It was reported then that the accused officers threatened then-Inspector-General of Police Egbetokun, to retire alongside them because he had also exceeded the statutory retirement threshold.
Egbetokun had directed the officers to appear before the Force Disciplinary Committee between February 10 and February 13, 2025.
The officers, however, reportedly maintained that Egbetokun lacked the legal authority to discipline or retire them because, according to them, he had himself passed his official retirement date of September 4, 2024, and remained in office only after President Bola Tinubu approved his tenure elongation.
Education
FG Withdraws Registration Fees Hike on WASSCE, NECO, SSCE
By Tony Obiechina, Abuja
The Federal Government has suspended the proposed review of registration fees for the 2027 West African Senior School Certificate Examination (WASSCE) and the National Examinations Council (NECO) Senior School Certificate Examination (SSCE).
The federal government last week announced the jacking up of the fees from N27,500 to N50,000.
However, in a statement on Monday July 13, 2026, signed by Director, Press and Public Relations, Boriowo Folasade, the Federal Ministry of Education announced that the letter conveying the proposed fee adjustment, dated June 18, 2026, has been withdrawn to allow for a comprehensive review and broader consultations with all relevant stakeholders before a final decision is taken.
According to the statement, the Ministry acknowledged the concerns and constructive feedback received from the public and appreciates the keen interest shown by Nigerians in matters relating to access to quality education.
The statement read: “The proposed review was informed by the prevailing economic realities and the rising cost of conducting credible national examinations.
“The current examination registration fees have remained largely unchanged for several years despite significant increases in operational costs, including logistics, security, printing of examination materials, technology deployment, quality assurance and other essential services required to maintain the integrity and credibility of public examinations across the country.
“Nevertheless, the Honourable Minister of Education, Dr. Maruf Tunji Alausa, has directed that the proposal be placed on hold in line with the Federal Government’s commitment to inclusive, transparent and evidence-based policymaking.
“This decision underscores the Ministry’s determination to ensure that policies affecting millions of Nigerian students and their families are carefully considered, socially responsive and reflect the collective interest of the nation.
“As part of the fresh review process, the Ministry will further engage extensively with examination bodies, State Ministries of Education, school proprietors and administrators, parents’ associations, organised labour, education stakeholders and other critical partners to ensure that any future decision is fair, sustainable, transparent and responsive to prevailing realities while safeguarding access to education.
“Accordingly, the proposed review of examination registration fees will not take effect, as earlier communicated, pending the conclusion of the consultation process.
“The Federal Ministry of Education reassures Nigerians that the welfare of students, equitable access to quality education and responsible policy decisions remain at the heart of the Renewed Hope Agenda of President Bola Tinubu, for the education sector.
“The Ministry appreciates the understanding, patience and continued support of all stakeholders and remains committed to keeping the public fully informed throughout the consultation process.”, it added.
Education
Education Stakeholders Split over FG’s N50,000 WAEC, NECO Examinations Fee
The Federal Government’s approval of a N50,000 registration fee for National Examinations Council (NECO) and West African Examinations Council (WAEC) from 2027 has attracted mixed reactions from education stakeholders.
In separate interviews on Sunday in Abuja, some of the stakeholders described the increase as excessive and unaffordable, warning it could worsen financial pressure on families and students.
Others urged the government to review the decision, introduce subsidies for vulnerable candidates, and ensure any fee adjustment reflects prevailing economic realities and wider stakeholder consultations.
However, some stakeholders supported the review, arguing that improved funding could strengthen certificate verification, digital infrastructure and service delivery if implemented with transparency and affordability safeguards.
The approval was conveyed by the Federal Ministry of Education in a memo dated June 18, 2026, signed by the Director of Senior Secondary Education, Adeniji Ibrahim.
The memo was signed on behalf of the Minister of Education, Dr. Tunji Alausa, following a directive to harmonise WAEC and NECO Senior School Certificate Examination registration fees.
Under the approval, NECO’s SSCE internal fee will rise from N30,000 to N50,000, while WAEC’s will increase from N27,000 to N50,000 from 2027.
An educationist, Beatrice Oke, described the increase as excessive despite acknowledging rising operational and logistics costs.
“The percentage increase is too high, although we expected a review after some time due to rising logistics costs.
“However, many average Nigerians may not afford the new fees, and this could force some students out of school,” she said.
Oke urged the government to review the increase or introduce measures to cushion its impact on low-income households.
She said affordable examination fees were vital to sustaining access to education and preventing more children from dropping out of school.
She also urged governments at all levels to expand subsidies and intervention programmes for vulnerable students to guarantee equitable access to education.
A private school owner, Funmilayo Soyoye, also described the increase as excessive.
She said many graduates seeking employment or admission for further studies might struggle to pay the new fee.
“Certificate verification is a mandatory requirement for many academic and employment processes and should remain affordable.
“The government should consider the economic realities facing Nigerians before approving such a sharp increase.
“This policy may discourage many young people from pursuing opportunities that require certificate verification,” she said.
Another school owner, who preferred anonymity, urged the government to justify the increase.
The proprietor said any fee review should be transparent and reflect improvements in service delivery.
According to the school owner, certificate verification should become faster, more efficient and more accessible.
A parent, Alhaji Abdulfatai Ibrahim, appealed to the government to rescind the decision in the interest of students and job seekers.
He said the increase would worsen hardship for families already grappling with rising education costs.
Ibrahim urged the authorities to engage stakeholders and adopt a more moderate pricing structure.
However, an education consultant, Olamide Ogunkoya, said the review might be justified if it strengthened certificate verification and digital infrastructure.
She said investment in secure verification systems would curb certificate fraud and enhance the credibility of Nigerian examination bodies.
Ogunkoya urged the government to balance cost recovery with citizens’ access to essential public services.
She also called for wider consultations before implementing major education policies, stressing that affordability and accessibility should remain central to reforms.
The memo, directed to the Registrar, NECO, conveying the increase, read:
“Re: Upward review of registration fees for examinations conducted by NECO.
“The West African Examinations Council has requested an upward review of the examination fees for the Senior School Certificate Examination for school candidates, with effect from 2027.
“You may recall that at a meeting of examination bodies held with the Honourable Minister of Education on March 31, 2026, where the need for upward review of examination fee was discussed, the Honourable Minister of Education directed that WAEC and NECOshould adopt a uniform fee for the conduct of the SSCE.
“Consequently, I am directed to convey the Honourable Minister of Education’s approval of the sum of Fifty Thousand Naira (N50,000) only, as the new examination fee for candidates with effect from NECO SSCE internal 2027.
“You are to bring the content of this letter to all stakeholders.
“Please accept the Honourable Minister’s warm regards.”


