JUDICIARY
Obi, Labour Party to Call 50 Witnesses to Prove Petition Against Tinubu’s Election

The Labour Party (LP) and its Presidential Candidate Mr Peter Obi have told the Presidential Election Petition Court, (PEPC) that they will call no fewer than 50 witnesses to testify in their petition.
LP and Obi are challenging the election of Sen.
Bola Tinubu.Counsel to the petitioners, Prof.
Awa Kalu (SAN) said this on Saturday in Abuja at the resumed proceedings of the pre-hearing phase before the five justices of the court.“We still have a few hiccups at the Independent National Electoral Commission, (INEC) because of the order of this court made on March 8, directing the commission to allow us carry out forensic investigation of BVAs which we have not been able to do.
”To this end, Kalu said that his clients would require seven weeks within which to present their petition in court.
The senior lawyer told the court that with regards to timing, his team was suggesting that 30 minutes be allotted to the witnesses classified as “star witnesses” to demonstrate any electronic evidence.
He, however, said that the 30 minutes excluded the time that would be used to demonstrate video evidence or any other electronic evidence.
“For this class of witnesses, they will be cross examined for 30 minutes by each respondent and re-examination will be for five minutes.
“In respect of other witnesses, we suggest 10 minutes for evidence-in-chief, 10 minutes for cross examination by each respondent and five minutes for re-examination.
“For the respondents, we suggest 20 minutes for the evidence-in-chief of their star witnesses, 30 minutes for cross examination and five minutes for re-examination.
“For their other witnesses, we suggest 20 minutes for evidence-in-chief, 15 minutes for cross examination and five minutes for re- examination.
He also suggested that where a respondent called a witness and other respondents wanted to cross examine such a witness, they would have to do so first before the petitioners take their turn.
Counsel to INEC, Mr Abubakar Mahmoud, SAN, said his client who conducted the disputed election planned to call five witnesses to defend the election of Tinubu.
Mahmoud told the court that his team would require seven days to argue the case of their client.
He said that the commission was proposing 30 minutes for its star witness to give the evidence-in-chief, 15 minutes for cross examination and five minutes for re- examination.
“For the regular witnesses, we propose 10 minutes for evidence-in-chief, 15 minutes for cross examination and five minutes for re-examination.”
He opposed the suggestion by the petitioners that a separate time be given to their expert witnesses for demonstration.
He also said that he was not aware of any hiccups between the petitioner and the commission as was alleged by the counsel to the petitioner.
Mr Roland Otaru, SAN, arguing for Tinubu and Shettima said that he would call 21 witnesses to defend his clients challenged victory excluding expert witnesses.
He requested that all expert reports be front loaded to the respondents within 48 hours.
On timing, he suggested that 20 minutes be allotted to expert witnesses for their evidence-in-chief, 30 minutes for cross examination and five minutes for re-examination.
“For regular witnesses, we suggest 10 minutes for evidence-in-chief, 15 minutes for cross examination and five minutes for re-examination.
Otaru prayed the court to make an order that the schedule of documents to be tendered should be exchanged between parties before the hearing.
For his part, Mr Adeniyi Akintola, SAN, counsel to the All Progressives Congress (APC) said that his client needed only nine days to call its seven witnesses excluding subpoenaed witnesses.
He agreed with the report of Otaru with regards to timing for each witness.
He, however, said that the petitioners had front loaded only three witness statements and wondered why they would need 49 days to call three witness from only three polling units.
The Chairman of the court, Justice Haruna Tsammani, having heard all arguments urged counsels to meet and reach an agreement on the issue of consolidating the petition.
He adjourned the matter until May 22 for continuation of pre-hearing.
The News Agency of Nigeria, (NAN) reports that earlier, counsel to INEC had amongst others, moved an application for the court to strike out ground two of the petition.
NAN also reports that ground two of the petition states that the election of the Tinubu is invalid by reason of corrupt practices or non compliance with provisions of the Electoral Act 2022.
Counsel to the petitioners prayed the court to dismiss the application for lacking in merit.(NAN)
CRIME
Bricklayer Bags Life Imprisonment for Defiling Minor in Toilet

An Ikeja Sexual Offences and Domestic Violence Court on Monday sentenced a Bricklayer, Azeez Shoderu, to life imprisonment for defiling his neighbour’s eight -year-old daughter in a toilet.
Justice Rahman Oshodi sentenced Shoderu after he found him guilty of the one-count charge of defilement proffered against him by the Lagos State Government.
Oshodi held that the prosecution successfully proved the offence of defilement against the convict.
According to him, the survivor’s testimony is well corroborated with the testimony of the investigative police officer, who also testified before the court.
He said the evidence of the convict was inconsistent and all attempted to distant himself from the offence did not hold waters.
Oshodi said: “The prosecutrix (survivor) gave a compelling, eyewittness evidence before this court that the convict, alias chisco ‘took me to the toilet, carried me on his lap, covered my mouth and put his thing in my ‘bumbum’.
“The prosecutrix identified the convict as his neighbour and when one of their neighbours saw them, he threw her into the other bathroom and ran away.
“Her evidence was consistent throughout her examination-in-chief that the convict removed her pant and put her on his lap,” the judge said.
The judge also said that the convict’s action had undoubtedly inflicted deep psychological wounds that might take a lifetime to heal.
The court further held that the convict admitted that he interacted with the child at the compound, where he claimed to have asked the child to bring water to him in the toilet.
However, the child narrated that she went to urinate at the bathroom, where the convict thereafter covered her mouth, placed him on his lap and had sexual act with her.
Meanwhile, the convict denied that nothing happened when taken to the police station.
During his arraignment on Sept. 29, 2023, he pleaded not guilty.
The court held that the convict was a squatter on Ago-Hausa Street in Ajegunle, Lagos, where he interacted with the child, and confirmed that he was at a toilet facility where the survivor was also present.
The court held that the evidence of the survivor was corroborated by the medical report, the Investigating Police Officer and medical doctor’s evidence showed that the convict committed the offence.
The judge noted that a child that had not attained the age of 18 was incapable of consenting to sexual activity.
The court having found the convict guilty, hereafter sentenced him to life imprisonment and ordered that his name should be registered as a sex offender.
The state counsel led by Mr Dare Dada presented three witnesses and tendered exhibits in court to prove the charge against the convict during trial while the defendant testified in his own defence.
According to the prosecution, the offence contravenes Section 137 of the Criminal Laws of 2015. (NAN)
JUDICIARY
Shares: Court Adjourns Ecobank’s suit Dec.1

A Federal High Courtin in Lagos, on Monday, held that it would await the decision of the Court of Appeal in a suit by Ecobank challenging alleged sale of 6.3 billion shares in Barbican Capital Ltd.
Ecobank had filed the suit against Obafemi Otudeko, Barbican Capital Ltd.
, and Honeywell Flour Mills of Nig. Plc. as the first, second and third defendants, respectively.Also joined as defendants are: Siloam Global Services Ltd., Oyeleye Foluke, First Bank of Nigeria (FBN) Holdings Plc., Corporate Affairs Commission (CAC), and the Nigerian Stock Exchange as the fourth, fifth, sixth, seventh and eighth defendants, respectively
The plaintiff, through its counsel, Mr Kunle Ogunba (SAN), is seeking, among other things, an interlocutory order restraining the defendants, collectively or individually, from taking any steps to sell, transfer or otherwise deal with the N6.
3 billion aggregate shares of Barbican Capital Ltd. in FBN Holdings Plc. pending determination of the suit.The bank is also seeking an interlocutory order to restrain the defendants from converting the shares of Honeywell Flour Mills Plc. pledged to Ecobank in furtherance of a credit facility, into cash or any negotiable instrument, pending determination of the suit.
The defendants had, however, filed preliminary objections challenging the court’s jurisdiction to entertain the suit.
They filed the objections on the grounds that a similar suit was pending before Justice Yellin Bogoro.
The defendants also raised objections on the grounds that there was a pending appeal on the matter before the Court of Appeal.
They said that the pending suit and appeal deprived the court of the jurisdiction to entertain the suit.
The defence had sought transfer of the case to the court’s administration judge since a similar suit was before Justice.
In a ruling on Monday, Dipeolu held that the court would not entertain applications in a suit pending before an appellate court.
“It will amount to judicial recklessness for the court to proceed,” he held.
He held that it was trite law that once an appeal was entered and the court was notified, the lower court would be stripped of its jurisdiction.
He cited the case of Okafor versus Attorney-General of Anambra State.
He said that parties in the suit had already informed the court of the existence of a similar suit before Bogoro, adding that the issue had been resolved.
He said that the court would not act on any application before it pending the court of appeal’s decision.
Dipeolu adjourned the case until Dec. 1 for mention.
Ecobank brought its suit marked FHC/L/CS/638/2025 pursuant to Order 26 Rules 5(1) and 6(1) of the Federal High Court (Civil Procedure Rules) 2019, and Section 36 of the 1999 Constitution.
The suit is supported by a 38-paragraph affidavit deposed to by one Mr Jafaru Kupa, a Financial Officer at Ecobank.
At the last adjourned date, Mr Bode Olanipekun (SAN), Mr Ade Adedeji (SAN), and Mr Taiwo Osipitan (SAN) appeared for the first, second and third defendants, respectively.
Mr Ademola Adesina appeared under protest for the fourth and fifth defendants, while Ms Abiola Ogundare and Mr Luqman Salman represented the sixth and seventh defendants.
Explaining his appearance under protest, Adesina said that fourth and fifth defendants had not been personally served with the originating processes.
He claimed that the defendants only became aware of the suit through media reports. (NAN)
CRIME
Two Friends Jailed 12 Months Each for Stealing Clothes

An Area Court in Jos on Monday, sentenced to friends, Michael Auta and Gabriel Sunday to 12 months imprisonment each for stealing clothes valued at N488,000.
The judge, Mrs Shawomi Bokkos, sentenced the convicts after they pleaded guilty to the offence.
The judge however gave the convicts an option of fine of N50, 000 each.
She also ordered that they both pay compensation of N200, 000 each to the complainant or risk another 12 months in jail for default.
Earlier, the Police Prosecutor, Insp Daniel Damulak, told the court that the case was reported at the B division police station, on April 17, by the complainant, one Ms Gift Ernest.
Damulak said the complainant told the police that the accused persons trespassed into her shop and stole clothes valued at N488, 000.
He said that during police investigation, the accused persons confessed to have committed the offence.
The prosecutor said that the offence contravened the Plateau State Penal Code law of Northern Nigeria of 2017. (NAN)