FEATURES
The GMO Debate in Nigeria: Concerns over Safety, Regulations

A nationwide rally against Genetically Modified Organisms (GMOs) in Nigeria has brought to the fore the concerns of experts over the potential health and environmental risks associated with the introduction of the organisms into the country’s food system.
The rally, led by the Health of Mother Earth Foundation (HOMEF) in collaboration with the GMO-Free Nigeria Alliance and civil society organisations took place on December 13 in major cities across the country.
According to the conveners of the rally, the outing is aimed to raise awareness about the dangers of GMOs and to pressure the government to reconsider its decision to approve genetically modified foods in the country.
The World Health Organisation (WHO) describes GMOs as organisms whose genetic material has been altered using genetic engineering techniques.
The alteration, according to the international health agency, involves the use of biotechnology to introduce genes from one species into the DNA of another species, creating a new organism with desired traits.
Therefore, genetically modified foods are foods that have been altered using genetic engineering techniques.
At the heart of the controversy is the claim by proponents of GMOs that they can help address food insecurity in Nigeria.
They assert that crops can be engineered to be more resistant to pests and diseases, reducing losses and increasing yields.
One of the proponents of GMOs is Kabiru Ibrahim, the National President of the All Farmers Association of Nigeria.
Therefore, the advantage is that it would even take farmers out of poverty.
“Any country in the world that you see has food security, as a matter of fact, they also do GMO. Nigeria will attain food security if it embraces GM crops.
“The way out of poverty and to get into food security for Nigeria is through GM crops.
“This is why Brazil is now a developed country. Most of what comes out of Brazil, in terms of corn, beans, and all that, are all GM’’, Ibrahim said.
However, Dr Nnimmo Bassey, Executive Director of HOMEF, argues that Nigeria does not need GMOs to address food insecurity.
The design of the GM crops, he maintains, does not support local economic growth but promotes dependency on corporate seed supply.
Bassey cites the example of the National Cotton Association of Nigeria (NACOTAN), which reported no significant increase in yields after introducing GM cotton seeds four years ago.
Instead, he says, the yield per hectare remained the same, and farmers noted that no other plant could germinate on the farmlands where the GM seeds were planted, even after four years.
This, Bassey argues, confirms concerns about loss of biodiversity and soil degradation due to the release of genetic material into the soil.
On his part, Ifeanyi Nwankwere, National Co-coordinator of the GMO-Free Nigeria Alliance, says “GMOs approved in Nigeria are not currently being labelled.
“The country’s socio-economic context does not allow for effective labelling, considering how food is sold in cups and basins in open market where majority of the people shop from,” he said.
Nwankwere said the biosafety regulatory system in Nigeria was not designed to ensure safety with regard to GMOs.
For instance, he alleged, the National Biosafety Management Agency (NBMA) Act had fundamental flaws, including the lack of provision on the precautionary principle, inadequate provision on public participation in decision making and others.
Similarly, Mariann Bassey-Orovwuje, Deputy Director at Environmental Rights Action, cautions that several other countries, including Russia, Mexico, Uganda, and up to 23 more, have placed bans on GMOs, citing the recent ban of GMO corn in Mexico.
“The courts highlighted the threats of the GMO variety to the country’s rich diversity of corn, stating that the genetically engineered corn posed the risk of imminent harm to the environment,” she said.
Experts also argue that the introduction of GMOs in Nigeria poses serious health risks.
According to a recent report by an Iranian researcher, GMO soybean caused significant damage to internal organs such as the liver and kidney in rats.
More so, as noted Joyce by Brown, Director of Programmes at HOMEF, there is no evidence that the National Biosafety Management Agency (NBMA) has conducted medium or long-term feeding tests to ascertain the safety of GMOs approved for use in Nigeria.
She bemoaned the presence of more than 50 imported packaged food products, containing GM ingredients in Nigeria.
These products, according to her, are abundant in market shelves across the country in different brands including cereals, vegetable oils, spices, ice-creams, and cake mixes amongst others
In Benin, where Agho Omobude, Coordinator of the Edo Civil Society Organisations (EDOCSO) led others on a march to Edo House of Assembly, state office of the Federal Ministry of Agriculture and Food Security and the Government House.
At those placed petitions were submitted, particularly in respect of the recent approval of 14 genetically modified foods in the country.
Omobude advocated legislations that would outlaw the sale of genetically modified foods in the state aa well as the country. He raises concerns over some super markets in the state which are reportedly selling the products without providing the customers with information about them.
All in all, the campaign against GMOs in Nigeria is not just about health and environmental risks; it is also about the economic implications of introducing GMOs into the country’s food system.
As argued by Bassey, the promotion of GMOs is driven by the interests of multinational corporations, which are more concerned with profits than with the welfare of Nigerians.
The demands of the campaign are clear, a ban on GMOs, including products brought in for food and food processing, as well as packaged processed foods.
The coalition also demands the nullification of all permits granted for GMOs, as they are not backed by adequate and certified risk assessments.
Furthermore, the experts call for an investment in agroecology, which ensures food security and food sovereignty while strengthening the Nigerian economy.
Inarguably, the foundation of a nation’s sovereignty lies in its ability to produce and control its own food. Without this, sovereignty is merely a theoretical concept.
Anti-GMOs insist that its introduction into the country’s food system poses significant risks to human health, the environment, and the economy.
It is imperative that the government takes a cautious approach and considers the concerns of experts and civil society organisations before making any decisions about GMOs. (NANFeatures)
FEATURES
Miss Valdeen N. Pierre Honored with Humanitarian Award at the 2025 National Humanitarian Summit

In a remarkable celebration of humanitarian service and strategic collaboration, Miss Valdeen Pierre , Country Director – United State ; A New Thing International foundation ; was honored with the Humanitarian Award at the prestigious National Humanitarian Summit 2025, held at the Shehu Musa Yar’Adua Centre, Abuja.
The award recognizes Miss Pierre’s and other humanitarian leaders unwavering commitment to humanitarian causes, particularly her collaboration with A New Thing International Foundation on the SOBE Project (School Outreach for Better Education) across Sokoto, Kebbi, Plateau, Niger States and the FCT.
Her efforts have significantly contributed to improving access to quality education and raising awareness about social vices among schoolchildren in underserved regions.The summit drew an esteemed audience comprising multiple stakeholders across the humanitarian value chain, including the Minister of Youth Development, Minister of Humanitarian Affairs, Special Assistant to the President on Humanitarian Affairs, the First Lady of Kwara State, First Lady of Zamfara State, representatives of United Nations Humanitarian Agencies, NGOs, INGOs, and other key players in the humanitarian sector.

The event featured a vibrant mix of panel discussions, keynote addresses, and the unveiling of strategic development plans aimed at strengthening collaborative impact across Nigeria and beyond.
In his vote of thanks, Ambassador Kenneth Anetor, the Executive Director of A New Thing International Foundation and Chairman of the Planning Committee, delivered a passionate closing speech. He commended the honorees and stakeholders, issuing a clarion call for deeper collaboration and renewed commitment to advancing strategic organizational development goals. His rousing remarks inspired attendees to rise to the moment and forge stronger partnerships for sustainable impact.
Ambassador Anetor also extended profound appreciation to the summit’s convener, Ambassador Michael Timothy, of the Funmilayo Health Foundation Africa, for the opportunity to serve as Chairman of the Planning Committee, and for creating a platform that celebrates excellence in service and drives transformative conversations in humanitarian work.
The National Humanitarian Summit 2025 stands as a milestone in Nigeria’s journey toward inclusive, people-centered development, with Miss Valdeen Pierre’s recognition serving as a beacon of hope and an example of the power of global partnership in humanitarian efforts.
For media inquiries , information, or donations please contact:
Email: anewthingworldwide@gmail.com
Phone: +2347037474611
Website: www.antworldwide@gmail.com
FEATURES
A Pope’s Funeral and New Leadership Paradigm
By Dakuku Peterside
The world came together on a warm April morning in Rome. Under Bernini’s wide colonnade, a simple wooden coffin lay, almost shy against the grand marble of St Peter’s. It held the body of Jorge Mario Bergoglio, better known as Pope Francis; it also carried a final message, passed without words.
As I watched the funeral, I wondered if the message would be clear to leaders in places where leadership is often about show, instead of service. Nigeria, my country, came to mind, because its people long for leaders who serve with humility, rather than rule with power.At first glance, comparing a Pope to political leaders might seem unconventional, but important commonalities exist. Upon reflection, parallels are audacious: a Catholic pontiff and a republic’s president inhabit very different orbits. Yet, both preside over institutions that store immeasurable wealth – monetary, cultural, spiritual – and both command loyalties that can bless or wound the human spirit. The difference lies in the currency they spend. Francis traded almost exclusively in moral capital. His motorcade rarely stretched beyond a small Fiat. He lived in a guesthouse, took meals in a communal dining hall, and instructed that his funeral expenses be redirected to shelters for people experiencing homelessness.In stark contrast, many political leaders, notably in Nigeria, have consolidated power through patronage, wealth accumulation, and coercion, severely damaging their credibility and the public’s trust. Nigerian power, by contrast, is often measured in sirens, convoys, and security votes; in the distance a public office holder can place between himself and the exhaust of everyday life. The funeral invited a radical thought: What if legitimacy flowed from humility, not from the choreography of importance? This stress on the importance of humility in leadership could enlighten and provoke reflection on governance.Humility, though, is not a mannerism. It is a decision made daily, a refusal to situate oneself above the collective story. Francis’ last request, “bury me outside the Vatican walls”, was a slight tectonic shift, the first such break with tradition in over a century. It told pilgrims and presidents alike that holiness is not the property of marble tombs but of living deeds. Pope Francis was buried in a simple wooden coffin, instead of the traditional three-nested casket, symbolising a life dedicated to humility and service. This act is probably the first of its kind in papal history. This powerful statement of reform and decentralisation challenged entrenched traditions that maintain privilege.Nigerian leaders, accustomed to the trappings of power and privilege, could profoundly benefit from embracing servant-leadership that prioritises citizens’ welfare above personal gain. Imagine for a moment a Nigerian governor choosing to sleep occasionally in the wards of a rural clinic that lacks electricity, a senator commuting without escorts, or a budget speech opened with an apology to those whose dreams are still postponed. Such gestures, inspired by Pope Francis’ humility, would earn ridicule from cynics trained by years of theatrical piety, yet they might also crack the granite of distrust that politics has laid around the citizen’s heart.Throughout his papacy, Francis consistently demonstrated simplicity, living modestly, rejecting extravagance, and continuously expressing empathy for ordinary people. For Nigerian political leaders, adopting similar modesty could substantially enhance their legitimacy, distancing them from the extravagant lifestyles that alienate them from the realities of the people they govern. By following PopeFrancis’ example, Nigerian leaders could bridge the gap between themselves and the citizens they serve, fostering a deeper connection and understanding.The scenes in Rome offered other lessons as subtle as incense. Refugees and cardinals knelt side by side; presidents exchanged the sign of peace; atheists joined murmured prayers. I thought of the Plateau and Benue, of plains made fertile by rivers and yet stained by cycles of reprisal killings, each side armed with grievances as old as maps. If a Pope’s funeral could fold the devout and the doubtful into the same silence, perhaps state ceremonies in Nigeria could be reimagined as platforms for reconciliation, rather than patronage. Symbols matter because they reach the imagination before the policy can touch the pocket. A wooden coffin whispered more convincingly than any communiqué on inclusive governance ever could.None of this is to canonise a man in hindsight; Francis was criticised, resisted, and sometimes misunderstood. Reform always bruises the edges of comfort. But in death, he achieved what many living leaders rarely managed: he convinced opposing camps to pause their quarrels long enough to say, “Thank you, Father.” The applause that rippled through St Peter’s Square did not celebrate power captured; it celebrated power surrendered. How extraordinary and disconcerting to think that the shortest route to influence might be the surrender of privilege.I wish to reference the testimony of Vinod Sekar, the Hindu philanthropist who once described being in the presence of “someone relentlessly good,” pointing to Pope Francis. Sekar confessed that holiness ceased to be a place, temple, mosque, or cathedral, and became instead a verb: to shelter, to include, feed. Nigeria’s streets are crowded with worship houses, yet the mood often betrays scarcity – the scarcity of trust, of light, of potable water, of the belief that tomorrow might be gentler than today. What if holiness were measured not by the decibels of our prayers but by the quality of our public schools and hospitals? What if fiscal policy became a beatitude, not just a technical tool or to score cheap political points but a source of broad social good?Authentic goodness, the kind that disarms calculation, cannot be legislated; it must be modelled. Leaders who publish their asset declaration unprompted, reject grandiose titles, and break bread with market women without cameras in tow, begin to tilt the atmosphere. And atmospheres are contagious. When a Pope chooses simplicity, bishops take notice; when a governor chooses public transport, commissioners start to wonder whether the show of might is worth its cost. A single act does not topple corruption, but it can short-circuit the logic that sustains it.Critics will argue that symbolism is cheap and that coffins and cassocks cannot patch roads or fund hospitals. They are right, unless the symbol changes the story, and the story changes the budget. A nation cannot legislate self-respect into its citizens, while its leaders accumulate properties in distant capitals. Neither can it ask for sacrifice, while official lips sip champagne at state banquets. The funeral in Rome stubbornly insisted that credibility is the one commodity no treasury can purchase; it must be earned in increments of integrity.As I write, the image of that lone coffin lingers, framed by sunlight and the tear-streaked faces of strangers who felt seen by a man in white. Power looked strangely like the vulnerability that morning, and history tilted, not dramatically, but perceptibly, toward the possibility that public office might again be synonymous with public service. I imagine a version of that morning unfolding on Abuja’s Eagle Square: no imported SUVs, no choreography of arrival times to signal rank, only leaders standing shoulder to shoulder with nurses, farmers, students, and the internally displaced. I imagine a moment when applause signals not relief that the ceremony is over but gratitude that the example is true. Perhaps that is naïve. Yet every durable reform was once a naïveté stubborn enough to outlive its ridicule.
The cypress boards of Francis’ coffin will one day fade, but the memory of his choices will migrate from anecdote to folklore, from folklore to benchmark. Nigeria, a country whose anthem pleads to “build a nation where peace and justice shall reign”, needs new benchmarks more urgently than new oil blocks. It requires the quiet scandal of servant leadership to make corruption look as outdated as a triple-nested casket. Nigerian leaders should embrace key principles drawn from Pope Francis’ life and funeral rites: humility that transforms rulers into servant-leaders; real and courageous reforms dismantling corruption; moral authority grounded in integrity and humility; inclusivity that fosters unity across ethnic and religious divides; and a legacy defined by public trust rather than accumulated wealth.Ultimately, Pope Francis’ funeral provided a profound narrative on leadership that Nigerian political figures must internalise. By embodying these principles, they can cultivate a governance system rooted in moral authority, transparency, and service, genuinely transforming their nation and securing a legacy that endures beyond wealth or power. I end where I began, in the quiet of that Roman square, listening to chants swell like a rising tide, watching a coffin slip into the basilica, and feeling the strange comfort of a paradox: the smaller the ego, the wider the circle of souls who find shelter beneath its shade. This truth, more than any doctrine, is the gospel political leadership must embrace if it hopes to bury an age of hollow grandeur and awaken a season of genuine hope.Dakuku Peterside, a public sector turnaround expert, public policy analyst and leadership coach, is the author of the forthcoming book, “Leading in a Storm”, a book on crisis leadership.
FEATURES
Keghku: Exit of A Public Relations Guru

By Cletus Akwaya
I almost dismissed the sad news as a piece of the age-long ‘April Fool’ as it came on the first day of the Month of April.
A family friend and Commissioner in the Benue state government broke the sad news to me in a rather blunt manner.
“Your good friend, Prof Tyotom Keghku is dead”.
Really? I was shocked to the marroe. I wished it were an April Fools Day gimmick. It was real. Prof Tyotom Keghku is gone to be with his creator.His departure is another hard lesson about life-that we are all mortals and that at the appointed time, we shall answer the Lord’s call.
I and the late Prof Keghku have come along away.
As far back as 1997, when he served s Director, Membership Services at the secretariat of the Nigerian Institute of Public Relations(NIPR) at Ikeja, he persuaded me to join the Institute and indeed availed me a membership form. I duly completed the form but failed to submit same for processing.However, when the opportunity presented itself in 2005, Keghku was then the Vice President of NIPR and I was serving as Commissioner of Information in Benue state. He again approached me and this successfully got me into the Benue state chapter of NIPR, where I remained a member till date.
A year after I became a member of the Institute, Benue state was to host the Annual General Meeting and I worked closely with Keghku to successfully host the conference.
Since then, I travelled with Keghku through the corridors of NIPR and along the line got elected as Member of the Governing Council in 2009 in Yenagoa and re-elected in 2011 in Kano for a four year tour of duty as a Council Member before I voluntarily stepped down in 2012 at the AGM hosted in Abuja that year.
Since the time I was elected into the Council of NIPR, Keghku never called be my name. He addressed me always as “Council Member” and I always reciprocated by calling him “Presido” in recognition of the office of Vice President, he once held.
The late Prof Keghku accomplished many things in his life time. He was a Professor of Mass Communication and at the time of his death, was Head Public Relations and Advertisement at the Benue State University’s Faculty of Communication Studies. He was also Rector of the Akawe Torkula Polytechnic Makurdi, owned by the Benue state Government. He had earlier in the early days of his career, served as Public Relations Officer of the Benue State Arts Council.
In all these assignments and more, Keghku discharged his duties and responsibilities most creditably. He was loved immensely by those who came in contact with him.
But it was in the practice of the Public Relations Profession that Keghku was better known. For over three decades, he bestrode the profession like a colossus as he served the NIPR in various capacities. He was at various times Editor of the NIPR Journal and was also Chair of the Membership Screening Committee. He was Vice Chairman of Fellows Screening Committee, and Vice Chairman of the Governing Council of the Institute at the time of his death.
In actual fact, Keghku was constantly the power behind the throne of many Presidents. He belonged to a group of “wise men” who understood the workings and politics of NIPR and were always consulted on the right candidate to become the President. Thus from the Presidency of the late Alhaji Muhammed, better known as “General” to the late Prof Ike Nwosu, and then Mallam Muhktar Sirajo to the incumbent, Dr Ike Neliaku, Keghku maintained his relevance in the Institute as he worked closely with each President on sensitive assignments.
There were indeed numerous assignments Keghku discharged for the Institute that space won’t permit me to mention here. He will indeed be missed by thousands of members of NIPR nationwide and particularly the Benue state Chapter, which he nurtured to maturity over the years.
Although the late Keghku was an accomplished academic and high flying Professional in the field of Public Relations, the many positions of authority he held in his career did not get to his head.Unlike other Nigerians of his era, he remained highly approachable, humble and peaceable personality, who was a friend of students, mentees, colleagues and subordinates alike.
For the many decades I knew Keghku and closely worked with him, I hardly saw him loose his temper. He was a soft-spoken leader, gentle and kind. When he had reason to present an opposing view to any situation, he did so in a manner that was so gentle and persuasive that could hardly be ignored.
In my close association with him, I deepened my life principle on the virtues of selflessness and sacrifice to friendhsip. In February this year, when our Newspaper Company, DAILY ASSET was preparing to stage the 8th Annual Awards in Abuja, the President of NIPR, Dr Ike Neliaku was nominated as one of the awardees. Taking cognizance of Prof Keghku’s close relationship with the President, I engaged him quite a lot to discuss details of the participation of the NIPR President at the event. Unknown to me, Keghku was speaking and chatting with me on his hospital bed! He must have been doing so in pains, yet he betrayed no such emotions of a patient, who was perhaps struggling to live. In one of the conversations, he actually disclosed to me that he was in hospital but assured me that it wasn’t something I should worry much about. That was vintage Keghku. He could stand for a friend and professional colleague in whatever circumstance, even while on his hospital bed. He could give his all at all times.
There is so much we can learn about the life and times of the departed Scholar. One of such lessons is that those who are truly knowledgeable are actually humbled by the depth of their knowledge. Prof Tyotom Keghku was a Guru, who was unmistakable in the field of Public Relations not only in Nigeria but across the African continent. His story typifies the adage of “rise from grass to grace”. From his humble beginnings from Igbor, Gwer LGA, Benue State, Professor Keghku became an acclaimed international Scholar, who left indelible footprints on the sands of time. We shall surely miss this academic giant, Intellectual heavy weight and Public Relations Guru. May the good Lord rest his gentle soul in Heaven. Adieu, Presido!!!
Dr Cletus Akwaya, former Council Member of NIPR is Publisher/Editor-in-Chief, DAILY ASSET.