FEATURES
Towards a Democracy-sensitive, People-oriented Judiciary

By Tunde Olusunle
That Nigeria’s very highly regarded *The Guardian* newspaper published a two-part editorial in the immediate past week on the nation’s judiciary, attests to the seriousness with which this arm of government is taken. *The Guardian* has deservedly earned its place in the nation’s media space, having survived four full decades, consistently making regular, daily showings on the newsstands.
This is despite the country’s unabated inclement socioeconomic situation which has summarily interred several other similar initiatives over the years. On Thursday March 16 and Friday March 17, 2023, an editorial titled “The judiciary and public criticism” featured on prominent pages of the authoritative publication. The editorial alluded to public denunciation of certain judgments delivered and actions taken, by the nation’s apex court and its leadership. Principally cited in the commentary, are pronouncements gifting Ahmed Lawan, president of the Senate, and Godswill Akpabio, former governor of Akwa Ibom state, tickets to contest the recent senatorial elections. Such appropriation was done by the Supreme Court, even when both political leaders did not participate in the primaries which would have presaged their emergence.Little known Bashir Machina had won the senatorial ticket for Yobe North, while Lawan was contesting the presidential ticket of the All Progressives Congress, (APC). Udom Ekpoudom a former deputy inspector general of police, (DIG), had also contested to represent Akwa Ibom North West zone in the senate, while Akpabio from the same zone, sought without success, the ticket of the nation’s top job. To the consternation of most followers of Nigerian politics, however, the Supreme Court ruled in favour of Lawan and Akpabio! Lyrics from *Unknown Soldier,* one of the classic hits of the maverick Afrobeat precursor, Fela Anikulapo-Kuti, appropriately capture such bewildering turn of events. Fela alludes to “government magic” which turns “red into blue and electric into candle!” The January 2020 “installation” in confounding circumstances, of Hope Uzodinma, by the Supreme Court, as governor of Imo State a few years ago, and the displacement of Emeka Ihedioha, remains fresh in popular consciousness.
Unsettled by accentuated public angst and vituperations against the Lawan/Machina and Akpabio/Ekpoudom twin-rulings, the Supreme Court through its director of information and press affairs, Festus Akande, issued a rejoinder. Titled: “Be mindful of unwarranted attacks on the judiciary,” the statement countered insinuations to the effect that sections of the judiciary had been compromised. Akande had stated that the concoctions to the effect that its justices were bought over “by some unknown and unseen persons, was nothing short of a bizarre expression of ignorance.” The release was very obviously a response to public bewilderment to the apex court’s arbitration in the substantial political litigations of Lawan vs Machina, and Akpabio vs the Independent National Electoral Commission, (INEC) and other interested parties. The Supreme Court, Dr Akande noted, was overburdened with nearly 600 cases deriving from the primaries of the various parties. The topmost arbiter in the land, Akande advanced, “was duty-bound to adjudicate on the matters brought before it to the best of its ability and in accordance with the law.”
Our recent very highly controversial and largely opaque general elections, have spawned additional responsibility for the Supreme Court. From parliamentary, to gubernatorial and thenceforth to the presidential elections, fall-outs, without doubt, will engage election tribunals and be escalated to the Supreme Court, in the weeks and months to come. Of the multilevel petitions emanating from the polls, that of the presidential election engenders the most interest and attention of Nigerians and indeed the global community. This is understandable given the pivotal place and preeminence of the president to the superintendence over, and guardianship of the people and the state. A winner, Bola Tinubu of the All Progressives Congress, (APC), was in the early hours of Wednesday February 28, 2023 returned by INEC.
There are, however, crystal clear, convincing and compelling reasons to interrogate the authenticity and veracity of the electoral exercise which produced him, in its totality. INEC which supposedly, had been preparing for the recent elections for four full years since the last general polls, pooling resources close to the one billion US dollar mark, delivered a complete sham, a shameful string of elections. INEC’s pretences and deceit of Nigerians about technological innovations to enhance and ensure seamless, fraud-proof, open, transparent and believable elections, was a colossal scam. The process was a perfidious bouquet of gross impunity, unashamed indiscretions, unparalleled and unpardonable lawlessness, unacceptable violence, brazen electoral thievery and mass disenfranchisement among others. The Centre for Democracy and Development, (CDD), reports that Nigeria’s recent electioneering, claimed 109 lives, which means more than one death per day within the period.
Mahmood Yakubu, a professor of History and INEC’s chairman for a second term of four years, delivered the most preposterous general elections this fourth republic. If the performance of Maurice Iwu, also a professor and Yakubu’s last but one predecessor was presumed controversial, Yakubu has unwittingly beatified Iwu. Yakubu’s outing fell way below the basement of global best practices. The characterisation of the elections by the local and global media, has been most unsparing. *The Economist* described the presidential election as “a chaotically organised vote and messy count.” An editorial by *The Financial Times* said the poll was “deeply flawed” and the winner “a wealthy political fixer.” *Aljazeera* wrote about “How violence robs Nigeria of their votes.” A Canadian newspaper also writes that “depression, anxiety, uncertainty be-clouds Nigeria’s political space as a drug-kingpin wins the election.”
Yakubu’s regime which popularised the culture of “inconclusive elections,” has equally introduced the dismissive expression, “go to court,” to the nation’s electoral vocabulary, in direct reference to disaffected parties. Atiku Abubakar, Nigeria’s former vice president, flew the flag of the Peoples’ Democratic Party, (PDP) at the recent presidential poll. There is substantial, even mind-boggling evidence to the effect that he won the election. Theories and hypotheses about the pre-election cannibalism of his vote tally by Peter Obi’s breakaway from the PDP to the Labour Party, (PDP), and the *G-5* governors, fall flat in the face of tangible evidence. Obi, by the way, filed his petition investigating the process of the emergence of Tinubu as president-elect, 24 hours before Atiku’s.
There is apprehension that electoral malfeasance as already committed and legalised by the issuance of the apposite “Certificate of Return,” (CoR) is *fait accompli.* Atiku, however, is calling for the withdrawal of Tinubu’s CoR, on the basis of “noncompliance with the electoral act, which invalidates Tinubu’s election.” While observing that by-passing and non-use of BVAS in the transmission of results impugned the integrity of the polls, Atiku also listed a dozen corrupt practices perpetrated by INEC to swing the election in favour of Tinubu. The suppression of votes; manipulation of ballots and ballot boxes; manipulation of BVAS machines; manipulation of accreditation and collation, and the manipulation of election material(s) delivery, feature among these infractions. Manipulation of election material(s); reverse logistics; massive thumb-printing of ballot papers, destruction of electoral materials; mutilations, cancellations; overwriting on result sheets, have also been highlighted in the petition. Atiku urges the court to either declare him Nigeria’s president or order a fresh election. Atiku’s core desire is that the votes of the people, their franchise, should count, consistent with global democratic traditions and expectations.
Flowing from recent experience where the judiciary has been repeatedly kicked around and disrespected by the executive, there are palpable concerns that the judiciary as presently constituted may not be in a position to deliver justice. The homes of revered judges and justices were breached under the cover of night in places, by operatives of the secret police, ostensibly to search for monies paid to them to influence judgements, under the present regime. The manner of the suspension, arraignment and summary retirement of Walter Nkanu Onnoghen, former CJN within the 2019 electoral season, reaffirms the dilemma of the judiciary under an all-powerful executive arm of government. There are apprehensions about the plausibility of objective, dispassionate, independent opinion and adjudication, by the Supreme Court. Yet, there is no better time for the judiciary to exercise its professionalism, forthrightness, and alignment with popular will and democracy, than at this time in our national and democratic evolution.
Certain video clips have been trending of late, depicting the incumbent CJN, Olukayode Ariwoola as presumably politically partisan. Ariwoola spoke at a banquet in his honour in Port Harcourt late last year, expressing delight that the governor of his state, Seyi Makinde, was a member of the *G-5* faction of governors in the PDP. Whereas Ariwoola said he intended to recommend to the Oyo State governor the handbook of infrastructural development in Rivers State, the manner of his expression lent itself to dialectics. There are also salient doubts accentuated by the nepotistic governmental manual operated by the outgoing President Muhammadu Buhari. Faith and ethnicity, more than anytime in our political trajectory, sadly, have played very critical roles across the broad canvas of governance and administration under Buhari.
There are reservations that justice may be difficult to get under a judiciary headed by a kinsman of the president-elect, if the latter, who hails from Lagos State, gets sworn-in. CJN Ariwoola hails from Oyo, in the same south west geopolitical zone like Bola Tinubu. An online newspaper has just reported that Ariwoola was in London on a short vacation, during which he will hold a secret meeting with Tinubu who himself was reported to have travelled to Paris earlier this week. Will all of these impact on honesty, believability and transparency at the coming arbitration? This is a unique opportunity for the judiciary to rediscover and reassert itself as the irrepressible temple of truth and justice in the service of democracy and the people.
*Tunde Olusunle, PhD, is Special Adviser on Media and Publicity to Atiku Abubakar, GCON, presidential flagbearer of the Peoples’ Democratic Party, (PDP)*
FEATURES
Miss Valdeen N. Pierre Honored with Humanitarian Award at the 2025 National Humanitarian Summit

In a remarkable celebration of humanitarian service and strategic collaboration, Miss Valdeen Pierre , Country Director – United State ; A New Thing International foundation ; was honored with the Humanitarian Award at the prestigious National Humanitarian Summit 2025, held at the Shehu Musa Yar’Adua Centre, Abuja.
The award recognizes Miss Pierre’s and other humanitarian leaders unwavering commitment to humanitarian causes, particularly her collaboration with A New Thing International Foundation on the SOBE Project (School Outreach for Better Education) across Sokoto, Kebbi, Plateau, Niger States and the FCT.
Her efforts have significantly contributed to improving access to quality education and raising awareness about social vices among schoolchildren in underserved regions.The summit drew an esteemed audience comprising multiple stakeholders across the humanitarian value chain, including the Minister of Youth Development, Minister of Humanitarian Affairs, Special Assistant to the President on Humanitarian Affairs, the First Lady of Kwara State, First Lady of Zamfara State, representatives of United Nations Humanitarian Agencies, NGOs, INGOs, and other key players in the humanitarian sector.

The event featured a vibrant mix of panel discussions, keynote addresses, and the unveiling of strategic development plans aimed at strengthening collaborative impact across Nigeria and beyond.
In his vote of thanks, Ambassador Kenneth Anetor, the Executive Director of A New Thing International Foundation and Chairman of the Planning Committee, delivered a passionate closing speech. He commended the honorees and stakeholders, issuing a clarion call for deeper collaboration and renewed commitment to advancing strategic organizational development goals. His rousing remarks inspired attendees to rise to the moment and forge stronger partnerships for sustainable impact.
Ambassador Anetor also extended profound appreciation to the summit’s convener, Ambassador Michael Timothy, of the Funmilayo Health Foundation Africa, for the opportunity to serve as Chairman of the Planning Committee, and for creating a platform that celebrates excellence in service and drives transformative conversations in humanitarian work.
The National Humanitarian Summit 2025 stands as a milestone in Nigeria’s journey toward inclusive, people-centered development, with Miss Valdeen Pierre’s recognition serving as a beacon of hope and an example of the power of global partnership in humanitarian efforts.
For media inquiries , information, or donations please contact:
Email: anewthingworldwide@gmail.com
Phone: +2347037474611
Website: www.antworldwide@gmail.com
FEATURES
A Pope’s Funeral and New Leadership Paradigm
By Dakuku Peterside
The world came together on a warm April morning in Rome. Under Bernini’s wide colonnade, a simple wooden coffin lay, almost shy against the grand marble of St Peter’s. It held the body of Jorge Mario Bergoglio, better known as Pope Francis; it also carried a final message, passed without words.
As I watched the funeral, I wondered if the message would be clear to leaders in places where leadership is often about show, instead of service. Nigeria, my country, came to mind, because its people long for leaders who serve with humility, rather than rule with power.At first glance, comparing a Pope to political leaders might seem unconventional, but important commonalities exist. Upon reflection, parallels are audacious: a Catholic pontiff and a republic’s president inhabit very different orbits. Yet, both preside over institutions that store immeasurable wealth – monetary, cultural, spiritual – and both command loyalties that can bless or wound the human spirit. The difference lies in the currency they spend. Francis traded almost exclusively in moral capital. His motorcade rarely stretched beyond a small Fiat. He lived in a guesthouse, took meals in a communal dining hall, and instructed that his funeral expenses be redirected to shelters for people experiencing homelessness.In stark contrast, many political leaders, notably in Nigeria, have consolidated power through patronage, wealth accumulation, and coercion, severely damaging their credibility and the public’s trust. Nigerian power, by contrast, is often measured in sirens, convoys, and security votes; in the distance a public office holder can place between himself and the exhaust of everyday life. The funeral invited a radical thought: What if legitimacy flowed from humility, not from the choreography of importance? This stress on the importance of humility in leadership could enlighten and provoke reflection on governance.Humility, though, is not a mannerism. It is a decision made daily, a refusal to situate oneself above the collective story. Francis’ last request, “bury me outside the Vatican walls”, was a slight tectonic shift, the first such break with tradition in over a century. It told pilgrims and presidents alike that holiness is not the property of marble tombs but of living deeds. Pope Francis was buried in a simple wooden coffin, instead of the traditional three-nested casket, symbolising a life dedicated to humility and service. This act is probably the first of its kind in papal history. This powerful statement of reform and decentralisation challenged entrenched traditions that maintain privilege.Nigerian leaders, accustomed to the trappings of power and privilege, could profoundly benefit from embracing servant-leadership that prioritises citizens’ welfare above personal gain. Imagine for a moment a Nigerian governor choosing to sleep occasionally in the wards of a rural clinic that lacks electricity, a senator commuting without escorts, or a budget speech opened with an apology to those whose dreams are still postponed. Such gestures, inspired by Pope Francis’ humility, would earn ridicule from cynics trained by years of theatrical piety, yet they might also crack the granite of distrust that politics has laid around the citizen’s heart.Throughout his papacy, Francis consistently demonstrated simplicity, living modestly, rejecting extravagance, and continuously expressing empathy for ordinary people. For Nigerian political leaders, adopting similar modesty could substantially enhance their legitimacy, distancing them from the extravagant lifestyles that alienate them from the realities of the people they govern. By following PopeFrancis’ example, Nigerian leaders could bridge the gap between themselves and the citizens they serve, fostering a deeper connection and understanding.The scenes in Rome offered other lessons as subtle as incense. Refugees and cardinals knelt side by side; presidents exchanged the sign of peace; atheists joined murmured prayers. I thought of the Plateau and Benue, of plains made fertile by rivers and yet stained by cycles of reprisal killings, each side armed with grievances as old as maps. If a Pope’s funeral could fold the devout and the doubtful into the same silence, perhaps state ceremonies in Nigeria could be reimagined as platforms for reconciliation, rather than patronage. Symbols matter because they reach the imagination before the policy can touch the pocket. A wooden coffin whispered more convincingly than any communiqué on inclusive governance ever could.None of this is to canonise a man in hindsight; Francis was criticised, resisted, and sometimes misunderstood. Reform always bruises the edges of comfort. But in death, he achieved what many living leaders rarely managed: he convinced opposing camps to pause their quarrels long enough to say, “Thank you, Father.” The applause that rippled through St Peter’s Square did not celebrate power captured; it celebrated power surrendered. How extraordinary and disconcerting to think that the shortest route to influence might be the surrender of privilege.I wish to reference the testimony of Vinod Sekar, the Hindu philanthropist who once described being in the presence of “someone relentlessly good,” pointing to Pope Francis. Sekar confessed that holiness ceased to be a place, temple, mosque, or cathedral, and became instead a verb: to shelter, to include, feed. Nigeria’s streets are crowded with worship houses, yet the mood often betrays scarcity – the scarcity of trust, of light, of potable water, of the belief that tomorrow might be gentler than today. What if holiness were measured not by the decibels of our prayers but by the quality of our public schools and hospitals? What if fiscal policy became a beatitude, not just a technical tool or to score cheap political points but a source of broad social good?Authentic goodness, the kind that disarms calculation, cannot be legislated; it must be modelled. Leaders who publish their asset declaration unprompted, reject grandiose titles, and break bread with market women without cameras in tow, begin to tilt the atmosphere. And atmospheres are contagious. When a Pope chooses simplicity, bishops take notice; when a governor chooses public transport, commissioners start to wonder whether the show of might is worth its cost. A single act does not topple corruption, but it can short-circuit the logic that sustains it.Critics will argue that symbolism is cheap and that coffins and cassocks cannot patch roads or fund hospitals. They are right, unless the symbol changes the story, and the story changes the budget. A nation cannot legislate self-respect into its citizens, while its leaders accumulate properties in distant capitals. Neither can it ask for sacrifice, while official lips sip champagne at state banquets. The funeral in Rome stubbornly insisted that credibility is the one commodity no treasury can purchase; it must be earned in increments of integrity.As I write, the image of that lone coffin lingers, framed by sunlight and the tear-streaked faces of strangers who felt seen by a man in white. Power looked strangely like the vulnerability that morning, and history tilted, not dramatically, but perceptibly, toward the possibility that public office might again be synonymous with public service. I imagine a version of that morning unfolding on Abuja’s Eagle Square: no imported SUVs, no choreography of arrival times to signal rank, only leaders standing shoulder to shoulder with nurses, farmers, students, and the internally displaced. I imagine a moment when applause signals not relief that the ceremony is over but gratitude that the example is true. Perhaps that is naïve. Yet every durable reform was once a naïveté stubborn enough to outlive its ridicule.
The cypress boards of Francis’ coffin will one day fade, but the memory of his choices will migrate from anecdote to folklore, from folklore to benchmark. Nigeria, a country whose anthem pleads to “build a nation where peace and justice shall reign”, needs new benchmarks more urgently than new oil blocks. It requires the quiet scandal of servant leadership to make corruption look as outdated as a triple-nested casket. Nigerian leaders should embrace key principles drawn from Pope Francis’ life and funeral rites: humility that transforms rulers into servant-leaders; real and courageous reforms dismantling corruption; moral authority grounded in integrity and humility; inclusivity that fosters unity across ethnic and religious divides; and a legacy defined by public trust rather than accumulated wealth.Ultimately, Pope Francis’ funeral provided a profound narrative on leadership that Nigerian political figures must internalise. By embodying these principles, they can cultivate a governance system rooted in moral authority, transparency, and service, genuinely transforming their nation and securing a legacy that endures beyond wealth or power. I end where I began, in the quiet of that Roman square, listening to chants swell like a rising tide, watching a coffin slip into the basilica, and feeling the strange comfort of a paradox: the smaller the ego, the wider the circle of souls who find shelter beneath its shade. This truth, more than any doctrine, is the gospel political leadership must embrace if it hopes to bury an age of hollow grandeur and awaken a season of genuine hope.Dakuku Peterside, a public sector turnaround expert, public policy analyst and leadership coach, is the author of the forthcoming book, “Leading in a Storm”, a book on crisis leadership.
FEATURES
Keghku: Exit of A Public Relations Guru

By Cletus Akwaya
I almost dismissed the sad news as a piece of the age-long ‘April Fool’ as it came on the first day of the Month of April.
A family friend and Commissioner in the Benue state government broke the sad news to me in a rather blunt manner.
“Your good friend, Prof Tyotom Keghku is dead”.
Really? I was shocked to the marroe. I wished it were an April Fools Day gimmick. It was real. Prof Tyotom Keghku is gone to be with his creator.His departure is another hard lesson about life-that we are all mortals and that at the appointed time, we shall answer the Lord’s call.
I and the late Prof Keghku have come along away.
As far back as 1997, when he served s Director, Membership Services at the secretariat of the Nigerian Institute of Public Relations(NIPR) at Ikeja, he persuaded me to join the Institute and indeed availed me a membership form. I duly completed the form but failed to submit same for processing.However, when the opportunity presented itself in 2005, Keghku was then the Vice President of NIPR and I was serving as Commissioner of Information in Benue state. He again approached me and this successfully got me into the Benue state chapter of NIPR, where I remained a member till date.
A year after I became a member of the Institute, Benue state was to host the Annual General Meeting and I worked closely with Keghku to successfully host the conference.
Since then, I travelled with Keghku through the corridors of NIPR and along the line got elected as Member of the Governing Council in 2009 in Yenagoa and re-elected in 2011 in Kano for a four year tour of duty as a Council Member before I voluntarily stepped down in 2012 at the AGM hosted in Abuja that year.
Since the time I was elected into the Council of NIPR, Keghku never called be my name. He addressed me always as “Council Member” and I always reciprocated by calling him “Presido” in recognition of the office of Vice President, he once held.
The late Prof Keghku accomplished many things in his life time. He was a Professor of Mass Communication and at the time of his death, was Head Public Relations and Advertisement at the Benue State University’s Faculty of Communication Studies. He was also Rector of the Akawe Torkula Polytechnic Makurdi, owned by the Benue state Government. He had earlier in the early days of his career, served as Public Relations Officer of the Benue State Arts Council.
In all these assignments and more, Keghku discharged his duties and responsibilities most creditably. He was loved immensely by those who came in contact with him.
But it was in the practice of the Public Relations Profession that Keghku was better known. For over three decades, he bestrode the profession like a colossus as he served the NIPR in various capacities. He was at various times Editor of the NIPR Journal and was also Chair of the Membership Screening Committee. He was Vice Chairman of Fellows Screening Committee, and Vice Chairman of the Governing Council of the Institute at the time of his death.
In actual fact, Keghku was constantly the power behind the throne of many Presidents. He belonged to a group of “wise men” who understood the workings and politics of NIPR and were always consulted on the right candidate to become the President. Thus from the Presidency of the late Alhaji Muhammed, better known as “General” to the late Prof Ike Nwosu, and then Mallam Muhktar Sirajo to the incumbent, Dr Ike Neliaku, Keghku maintained his relevance in the Institute as he worked closely with each President on sensitive assignments.
There were indeed numerous assignments Keghku discharged for the Institute that space won’t permit me to mention here. He will indeed be missed by thousands of members of NIPR nationwide and particularly the Benue state Chapter, which he nurtured to maturity over the years.
Although the late Keghku was an accomplished academic and high flying Professional in the field of Public Relations, the many positions of authority he held in his career did not get to his head.Unlike other Nigerians of his era, he remained highly approachable, humble and peaceable personality, who was a friend of students, mentees, colleagues and subordinates alike.
For the many decades I knew Keghku and closely worked with him, I hardly saw him loose his temper. He was a soft-spoken leader, gentle and kind. When he had reason to present an opposing view to any situation, he did so in a manner that was so gentle and persuasive that could hardly be ignored.
In my close association with him, I deepened my life principle on the virtues of selflessness and sacrifice to friendhsip. In February this year, when our Newspaper Company, DAILY ASSET was preparing to stage the 8th Annual Awards in Abuja, the President of NIPR, Dr Ike Neliaku was nominated as one of the awardees. Taking cognizance of Prof Keghku’s close relationship with the President, I engaged him quite a lot to discuss details of the participation of the NIPR President at the event. Unknown to me, Keghku was speaking and chatting with me on his hospital bed! He must have been doing so in pains, yet he betrayed no such emotions of a patient, who was perhaps struggling to live. In one of the conversations, he actually disclosed to me that he was in hospital but assured me that it wasn’t something I should worry much about. That was vintage Keghku. He could stand for a friend and professional colleague in whatever circumstance, even while on his hospital bed. He could give his all at all times.
There is so much we can learn about the life and times of the departed Scholar. One of such lessons is that those who are truly knowledgeable are actually humbled by the depth of their knowledge. Prof Tyotom Keghku was a Guru, who was unmistakable in the field of Public Relations not only in Nigeria but across the African continent. His story typifies the adage of “rise from grass to grace”. From his humble beginnings from Igbor, Gwer LGA, Benue State, Professor Keghku became an acclaimed international Scholar, who left indelible footprints on the sands of time. We shall surely miss this academic giant, Intellectual heavy weight and Public Relations Guru. May the good Lord rest his gentle soul in Heaven. Adieu, Presido!!!
Dr Cletus Akwaya, former Council Member of NIPR is Publisher/Editor-in-Chief, DAILY ASSET.