Connect with us

FEATURES

The PIA and Oil Company Divestments: A Time to Act

Published

on

Share

By Kome Odhomor

Health of Mother Earth Foundation (HOMEF) and We the People invited Niger Delta communities and civil society activists to a one-day conversation on the recently approved Nigerian Petroleum Industry Act. The event which held at the Ken Saro Wiwa foundation innovation Hub in Port Harcourt provided an open space to discuss recent happenings around divestments, where the biggest oil companies in the Niger Delta are selling off their assets and going farther offshore.

In his opening presentation, Nnimmo Bassey, Director of the Health of Mother Earth Foundation stated that from the start, the business of oil extraction operated as a mix of corporate greed and state backed repression.

While it is important that people living in locations where investors, governments or institutions carry out projects cts are consulted, in
the Niger Delta, this has never been the case. The free, prior and informed consent of the people have never been sought or received. These relations of production have remained largely the same from pre-colonial to colonial and present neo-colonial times.

Even in decisions regarding investments, development, or even infrastructural projects, there is wilful neglect and refusal to consult or engage the people in decision making processes. Projects are often thrown at communities even when they are not the priority needs of the people. Little wonder that the projects get abandoned during construction or are left to rot after completion.

All efforts to placate and assuage the massive harms inflicted on the Niger Delta has been carried out through various means including oil company driven Memoranda of Understanding with communities, and various government interventions through agencies such as Niger Delta Development Board (NDDB) established in 1961, the Niger Delta Basin and Rural Development Authority (NDBRDA) established in 1976, the Oil Mineral Producing Areas Development Commission (OMPADEC) established in 1992, the Petroleum Trust Fund (PTF) in 1995,  Niger Delta Development Commission (NDDC) established in 2000 and the Ministry of Niger Delta Affairs created in 2008. These bandages have only sought to cover up festering wounds, without dealing with the fundamental ailments that over six decades of disastrous exploitation has wrought. And they have mostly failed.

With over 1,481 wells, 275 flow stations, over 7,000 kilometres length of oil/gas pipelines and over 120 gas flare furnaces, the Niger Delta is an ecological bomb and one of the most polluted places in the world. Nnimmo Bassey called on the people of the region to rise and demand ecological justice.

In his presentation, Ken Henshaw of We the People reflected on Nigeria’s Petroleum Industry Act and the new frenzied divestment moves by oil companies. According to him, while the PIA establishes a Host Communities development framework to transfer benefits to communities, it doesn’t however allow communities any decent participation in managing the fund, or even determining who runs the trust. Oil companies are given overriding powers to manage the 3% of operational costs contributed to the trust in any manner they deem appropriate; as well as determine which communities qualify to be ‘hosts’. Similarly, the managers of the funds are not even required by the PIA to be from the host communities.

In an outrageous demonstration of the criminalization of communities, the PIA says; “Where in any year, an act of vandalism, sabotage or other civil unrest occurs that causes damage to petroleum and designated facilities or disrupts production activities within the host community, the community shall forfeit its entitlement to the extent of the cost of repairs of the damage that resulted from the activity with respect to the provisions of this Act within that financial year”

This provision stems directly from the erroneous view which has been peddled by oil companies that communities are responsible for sabotage on pipelines and oil theft. However, these view has been debunked by the NNPC and even the United Nations Environment Programme. Both blame equipment failure for majority of spills. Criminalizing oil producing communities in this regard is unfortunate and a smokescreen to shield oil companies from responsibility for the ongoing ecocide in the region. This provision will most likely result in consistent denial of benefits which would in turn engender regular conflicts.

On gas flaring, while the PIA makes it illegal, it nonetheless creates a series of exemptions which ensures that the same gas flare regime continues literarily unchecked, and empowers the government to give licenses to oil companies to flare. The PIA also does not state a definite date for ending gas flaring. Given the health and environmental challenges associated with gas flaring, this is an unfortunately onslaught on the ecology and health of the people of the region.

Surprisingly, fines for gas flaring will not directly benefit communities that suffer the impacts. While sections 52 and 104 says that fines for flaring will be used for environmental and health remediation, it prescribes that such payments be made not to the host communities, but to an agency it establishes called the Midstream and Downstream Gas Infrastructure Fund. In actual fact, this Agency has no mandate or function related to environmental remediation. Evidently, the Act considers gas flaring a waste of economic resources which should be paid for, and not an abuse which is impacting the climate, the health and livelihoods of communities.

One of the key issues in the PIA is the framework for the utilization 30% of NNPC profits for oil exploration in so-called frontier basins. While the Act expects the NNPC to become a profit-making enterprise, it already dedicates a hefty chunk of its expected profit into the search for additional crude oil. The fact that public resources have to be spent in this effort is indicative that oil companies around the world do not consider this a worthwhile investment. Rather than spend so much of the expected profits of NNPC on exploring for oil in unlikely places, we reckon that the government considers investing the same percentage of NNPC profits in generating clean and affordable energy for Nigerians, or even supporting an environmental remediation fund aimed at remediating years of pollution, livelihood loses and health impacts of oil extraction.

Sadly, it is noteworthy that the entire PIA expresses no intention for moving Nigerian away from dependence on fossils. At a time when the world is moving away from crude oil, the PIA plans to make more investments in that regard. This indicates that the government is not keeping in tandem with global trends and unperturbed by concerns of global warming and climate change. Ironically, Nigeria is emerging as one of the most impacted countries globally by the effects of climate change. The shrunken Lake Chad, increased desertification and the regular floods around the Atlantic coast are ready evidences. That the PIA pays no heed to issues of climate change, despite Nigeria’s NDCs, and aims to plunge the country further into fossil extraction is a major source of concern.

The meeting also expressed concern over the emerging shifts from oil and the fate of oil producing communities.

After over 70 years of oil extraction and the devastating impacts it has had on oil producing communities, there are indications that the most complicit oil companies are leaving. And new pressures are emerging from their divestment. The biggest multinational player in Nigeria’s oil and gas sector, and also the most culpable in several years of oil pollution and rights abuses, Shell plans to divest its entire Nigeria joint venture portfolio and make a ‘clean break from Niger Delta assets’.  In 2022, Nigerian independent oil and gas company, Seplat Energy Plc informed the public through a statement that it had acquired ExxonMobil’s Nigerian shallow water business.

As companies divest, local players take over oil assets and immediately deny responsibility for historical damages. For oil producing and impacted communities, divestment means more remote possibilities of holding corporations accountable for pollution, as well as fewer economic opportunities for communities. As companies divest, the Nigerian government keeps failing to establishing frameworks or policies for addressing community concerns. According to the head of NNPC, ‘will ensure that Nigeria’s National strategic interest is safeguarded, by developing a Comprehensive Divestment Policy’. No such plan has been put in place.

For the ecologically devastated communities of the Niger Delta, no hurried divestment by transnational oil companies will be tolerated without restoration of their environment and livelihoods. For them, the definition of just transition has to include repairing the damage occasioned by oil pollution, an audit of the health of the people and a plan to respond to the threats posed by climate change. A just transition must also provide justice for the countless victims of oil company inspired and state sanctioned abuses, and reparations to the people of the Niger Delta for decades of expropriation. Anything short of these is injustice.

Kome Odhomor
Media/Communication Lead

FEATURES

When Will The Road Killings Stop?

Published

on

Share

By Sale Rusulana Yanguruza

Nigeria has today counted and witnessed multiple killings of innocent people and bombings of citizens on the roads from different angles in the South and some Northern parts of Nigeria. Unfortunately, none of the perpetrators have been brought to face the wrath of the law.

In less than two months, 16 hunters were killed by mob youth in Uromi, Enugu State, and the details about those arrested and suspects are still undisclosed to the members of the public.

Their families and the Hausa people are mourning the death of these innocent individuals who were brutally killed, but the silence of the government is devastating. Even the compensation that Governor Abba Kabir Yusuf promised and requested from the Edo State government is still unclear to the members of the public.

The most devastating aspect of the road killings is that most of the victims are Hausa or Muslim, simply because they are from the North. How can traveling on the roads be a reason to kill a citizens? Why are Hausa and Muslim individuals always the victims ? Is it only hausa people traveling by the road in Nigeria?

Even though the answers that these youths usually give is that Fulani and terrorists are killing them overnight, that is not a reason to block roads and kill innocent people. They should know that Zamfara, Katsina, Kaduna, Niger, and Borno States are facing insecurity challenges like kidnapping, Boko Haram and Fulani clashes for over a decade, but none of the people from these states view a particular tribe or religion as the cause and use roads to kill innocent people.This act should be stop!

No doubt, Constitutionally, every individual in this country is entitled to move anywhere and leave wherever he/she wish to leave but unfortunately for Hausa and some Muslim individuals, traveling by road seems to be considered a sin by some youth, leading to serious punishment, which is barbaric killings by their so-called fellow citizens who do not have emotional feel for human being and their compatriots citizens .

I believe that in Nigeria, no tribe is exempt from traveling from one place to another. However, it’s saddening and regrettable that the Hausa people are disproportionately affected and become victims of road killings, and the government is still yet to take necessary actions to deal with such inhumane and unfathomable actions carried out by some groups.

The most terrible and gruesome aspect of such acts is that every day, the situation rises to an unbearable and unacceptable level. It’s imperative and necessary for the government to end these ongoing road killings before it will escalate to an uncontrollable level.

The government shouldn’t limit its activities to only condemning and sending condolence messages to the families victims of these inhumane and unfathomable killing of innocent people; actions must be taken, and the punishment of those involved in such road killings must be brought to public eyes.

No doubt, swift punishment would aid in reducing these ethno-religious killings in the country and would serve as a reference and warning to such mob groups that the government is prioritizing and exercising its constitutional duties as a government in protecting the lives of its citizens who are brutally killed and burned.

Doubtless, Most of the victims are from Kano State, where the majority of travelers from all 36 states enter the state everyday to carry out their business activities, considering the state as a center of commerce. Still, none of the travelers from other ethnic groups were killed and burnt in Kano. Why do some groups choose to reward these people with the killings of their own brothers and sisters ?

It’s very alarming to note the numbers of Northerners killed simply because they’re traveling is rising every month, with no concrete reasons to justify their offenses, but merely due to their identity as Northern Muslims or Hausa by tribe. Additionally, Truck drivers have continuously faced these killings over the past eight years, yet no actions have been taken to avert further escalation and end it permanently.

In one editorial written by a popular newspaper in Nigeria, it’s reported that over 50 drivers have been killed and even burned their goods with some still missing due to this animalistic attitude of road killings. In May 2022, a pregnant woman, Harira Jubril, 32, and her four children were killed in the Orumba South Local Government Area of Anambra State. Even those who committed this act haven’t faced the wrath of the law.

One may ask: Is the government truly ready to end these barbaric killings that keep surging towards a particular or specific religion or tribe? Regrettably, in 2023, a group of mob killed about 20 people who were going for religious activities. All of them are Muslims. But who are the suspects, where are they, and what actions has the government taken on the perpetrators?

The people who killed those going to Maulud are the same people who recently killed those going for a wedding in a University Bus carrying the name of Ahmadu Bello University Zaria written in bold with a plate number to stop them and killed and burnt the car . What offense do they commit? How can a University bus carry terrorists and travel on the roads? The most disheartening aspect of these barbaric and animalistic acts is that they’re killing and burning people and still celebrating the deaths of these individuals; taking video footage-How heartless!

Do you think the government punishes those who killed the people going for Maulud, the Uromi 16, Harira Jubril and her four children, in public? The mob group would never dare attempt to do it again, sadly what is happening now is worrisome because the inactions is making the situation to take another dimension.They may believe that since several incidents, no actions have been taken to punish and bring them to book publicly, so it’s okay to repeat it again.May be it’s for this reason, recently, some of the mob group from Benue state killed Jamilu Ahmad and Barhama Suleiman who are from Kano State just in less than a week plateau group killed 13 and injured others.

Advisedly, the government and stakeholders must come up with security strategies and measures that will bring an end to these road killings. This can be achieved by updating the public about those arrested and who committed this animalistic act, to bring them to book and let the world know they have been punished.It’s notable that they celebrate the killing of people, take videos, and share them publicly, showcasing what they’ve done. If they can confidently act in such a manner, why is the government not updating the public about what happened to them after they’ve been arrested and taken to court?

ReplyReply allForwardAdd reaction
Continue Reading

FEATURES

Broken Trust: How Banking Policies Are Failing the Nigerians

Published

on

Share

By Princess Ngozi Ibiwari Odibueogwu

In a nation still battling economic disparity, inflation, and a fragile middle class, one would expect that accessing basic financial services would be seamless, especially for loyal customers. Unfortunately, that is not the case for qmany Nigerians, particularly those who operate personal accounts for genuine and honest purposes.

Recently, I had a sobering experience that all reflects a disturbing trend in our financial system.

After using my bank account for nearly seven years, I returned to the bank to upgrade and reactivate the account, which had gone dormant. To my utter dismay, I was informed that in addition to submitting valid identification, I would also need to swear a court affidavit—a legal document requiring time, effort, and money.

When I questioned the rationale for this requirement, the response was simply: “It’s for verification; we need to be sure the documents are real.” Real? Documents from the same customer who has been with the bank for years? The logic was not only baffling but dehumanising. I walked away not just inconvenienced, but heartbroken by the realization that our banking policies often treat law-abiding citizens with undue suspicion.

Here lies the bitter irony: while ordinary Nigerians are made to jump through hoops to access accounts holding their hard-earned money, individuals with questionable wealth—sometimes amounting to billions—are rarely asked to swear affidavits about the source of their funds.

We have seen how some bank accounts linked to fraud or corruption contain obscene amounts of money, yet those individuals are not required to bring affidavits from courts.

 They are not told their documents need “verification” or that their banking activities are under scrutiny. Instead, they are welcomed with open arms—given VIP treatment, sometimes with personal relationship managers and zero friction.

What then is the role of our banks? Are they truly serving the public interest, or have they become gatekeepers for the elite and tormentors of the average Nigerian?

A System Designed to Discourage the Honest

Banking institutions are supposed to be facilitators of progress. They are entrusted with the savings of the people and expected to empower citizens by providing fair access to services. Instead, they often impose tedious bureaucracies that frustrate genuine customers. From endless paperwork, slow customer service, hidden charges, and now, legal hurdles like affidavits for simple account updates, the system increasingly feels like it was designed not to serve, but to discourage.

Imagine a widow trying to withdraw the savings of her late husband only to be asked for court affidavits, local government certificates, next-of-kin letters, and even publication in a national newspaper—just to access N200,000. Now contrast that with a politically exposed person accused of corruption who moves N10 billion through multiple shell accounts with barely a raised eyebrow. Where is the justice?

The Failure of KYC in Practice

The Central Bank of Nigeria (CBN) mandates banks to implement Know Your Customer (KYC) protocols. This is meant to combat money laundering and financial crimes. However, in practice, KYC seems to only apply strictly to the poor. The elite are rarely subjected to the same rigorous checks.

A tailor who wants to open an account is asked to bring utility bills, a referee, BVN, two passport photos, and in some cases, a letter from a religious leader. But someone who wants to deposit ₦500 million in suspicious cash? They are offered a cold drink and guided to a private room. This double standard perpetuates distrust and creates a class divide in a system that is supposed to be inclusive.

Trust: The Missing Currency

Banking, at its core, is built on trust. People deposit their money with the belief that the bank will protect it and treat them with fairness and dignity. But when honest citizens are treated like criminals, while the actual financial criminals are treated like royalty, that trust is destroyed.

Many Nigerians, especially those in rural and semi-urban areas, no longer see banks as allies. This is one of the reasons informal savings groups and “ajo” cooperatives are still thriving despite their risks because they treat people like people, not like suspects.

The Call for Reform

It is time for Nigeria’s banking industry to reflect and reform. Policies must be reviewed not only for compliance but for compassion. The regulators CBN and the Nigerian Deposit Insurance Corporation (NDIC)—must hold banks accountable, not just in terms of capital reserves and risk exposure, but in how they treat their customers.

We need policy frameworks that protect both national security and human dignity. Yes, verification is important, but it should be proportional and reasonable. It should not place undue burden on the very people the banks are meant to serve.

Conclusion: Build for People, Not for Profit Alone

Nigerians are not asking for special treatment. We are simply asking to be treated fairly. For too long, our financial systems have rewarded dishonesty and punished integrity. This must change.

The next time a customer walks into a bank to reactivate their account, they should be greeted with respect and efficiency—not suspicion and red tape. And the next time a massive deposit is made without a credible source, it should trigger the same level of scrutiny—if not more.

Because justice should not be for sale, and trust should not be broken especially by the very institutions we depend on.

ReplyReply allForwardAdd reaction
Continue Reading

FEATURES

Examining Nigeria’s Approach to Defeating Sickle Cell Disease

Published

on

Share

Each year, the globe commemorates World Sickle Cell Day (WSCD) on June 19, an event to raise awareness about Sickle Cell Disease (SCD), one of the most common hereditary blood disorders in the world.

The theme of the global observance for 2025 is “Global Action, Local Impact: Empowering Communities for Effective Self-Advocacy”, resonating across the corridors of academia, clinical settings and advocacy platforms.

SCD is a group of inherited blood disorders characterised by abnormally shaped red blood cells that resemble crescents or sickles.

The cells can block blood flow, causing severe anaemia, episodes of severe pain, recurrent infections, as well as medical emergencies like strokes, sepsis or organ failure.

In Nigeria, home to the largest population of people affected by SCD, the day carries a deeper, more urgent significance.

The burden of Sickle Cell Disease (SCD) in the country continues to strain the nation’s healthcare resources and families affected by the disorder.

This growing challenge calls for comprehensive and sustained intervention across prevention, treatment and education.

Without urgent action, including newborn screening, public awareness and access to advanced therapies, the impact on families and the healthcare system will continue to deepen.

It is a timely call for national unity in curbing the spread of this life-altering disease and improving the lives of those who live with it daily.

With an estimated 150,000 Nigerian children born each year with the disorder, according to Harvard’s Dr Maureen Achebe, the country finds itself at the epicenter of a public health crisis.

While prevention remains the ideal, early diagnosis through newborn screening is a practical and effective tool that could reduce mortality among children under five.

Achebe, a renowned hematologist and global health equity advocate from Harvard, said “these babies look normal at birth”, warning that without early detection, mortality rates could reach 50–80 per cent before the age of five, a heartbreaking figure in a country with already strained healthcare infrastructure.

“Newborn screening helps identify those with SCD early so they can receive care and therapy to live normal lives,” she added.

She advocated nationwide newborn screening programme, alongside routine preventive care such as vaccination, folic acid supplementation, and prophylaxis against infections like pneumonia and malaria.

She also dispelled cultural myths surrounding the disease, stating unequivocally that SCD is an inherited genetic disorder, not a curse or result of witchcraft, a reminder of the persistent social stigma surrounding the condition in many communities.

At the heart of Nigeria’s strategy to reduce the prevalence of SCD is prevention, and according to Prof. Patricia Lar, Acting Vice-Chancellor of Yakubu Gowon University, Abuja (formerly UniAbuja), genetic compatibility awareness must be the foundation of preventive approach.

Lar spoke through Prof. Titus Ibekwe, the Provost of the College of Health Sciences, during a public lecture titled “The Evolving Therapeutic Landscape in Sickle Cell Disease,”

She emphasised the importance of prevention as the most effective strategy in eliminating Sickle Cell Disease (SCD) in Nigeria.

She stressed that “seriously considering partner compatibility could reduce the disease to only carriers, discouraging marriages between incompatible partners.

“If we maintain this precautionary measure over time, we will be able to eliminate SCD or reduce it to a minimum world-wide ,” she added.

This message is echoed in the advocacy efforts of Mrs Aisha Edward-Maduagwu, the National Coordinator of the Association of People Living with Sickle Cell Disorder.

She called for the strict enforcement of genotype compatibility checks, especially in states like Anambra, where legislation exists but implementation lags.

“Our association has made significant strides advocating for the rights and welfare of people living with SCD.

“We urge prospective couples to prioritise genotype testing and ensure compatibility before marriage,” she said.

Beyond bone marrow transplants, gene therapy is emerging as the next frontier, according to Lar.

“This revolutionary treatment aims to correct the sickle cell gene itself, potentially offering a one-time cure.

“This is where the future of SCD treatment lies,” she noted. “It modifies the faulty gene to function like a normal gene, potentially eliminating the disease at its source.”

In recent years, the emergence of curative treatments, though limited by cost, has brought renewed hope to families affected by SCD.

The Lagos State University Teaching Hospital (LUTH) has taken significant steps forward, with successful bone marrow transplants performed since 2024.

Dr Adeseye Akinsete, a pediatric hematologist at LUTH, confirmed that all transplanted patients are alive and well, and that the centre is preparing for a third cycle in August 2025.

“This represents a major breakthrough in the country’s medical landscape.

“We are proving that advanced therapies can be delivered locally. Nigerians are beginning to trust and participate in these programmes,” he said.

Akinsete added that LUTH also offers post-transplant support services, including virtual consultations for patients outside Lagos, and has established a dedicated transplant clinic that follows up with patients who received care both locally and abroad.

The Centre of Excellence for Sickle Cell Disease Research and Training (CESRTA) at Yakubu Gowon University is playing a pivotal role in bridging the gap between research and care.

Since its inception in 2015, CESRTA has worked to provide clinical and translational research, skills training, and community outreach.

Prof. Obiageli Nnodu, CESRTA Director and Co-Chair of the 5th Global Congress on SCD, highlighted the Centre’s collaborations with both local and international partners and its mission to make advanced SCD care more accessible and affordable.

Following the recent global congress, the Coordinating Minister of Health and Social Welfare, Prof. Muhammad Pate, announced the upgrading of CESRTA to the National Centre of Excellence for SCD Research and Training, recognising its impact on national policy, research, and education.

In spite of the scientific and medical advances, the social and economic barriers to quality care for SCD patients remain significant.

Dotun Oladipupo, Chairman of the Oladipupo Foundation in Abeokuta, medication for managing sickle cell was extremely expensive.

“Many families cannot afford life-saving therapies. This must change.”

Oladipupo called on the Federal Government to invest more in alternative medicine research, as well as to promote inclusive legislation that gives people with SCD access to equal job opportunities, education, and healthcare.

“We also need bills that protect the rights of those living with the disease, so that stigma and discrimination no longer define their everyday experience,” he said.

The unifying thread running through the events, speeches, and expert recommendations marking World Sickle Cell Day 2025 is clear: community empowerment is essential for lasting change.

Whether through genotype testing campaigns, newborn screening, accessible treatments, or public education, the solutions must be people-centered and government-supported.

As Nigeria leads the global conversation on SCD by necessity, it must also lead by example, transforming advocacy into action, policy into practice, and awareness into impact.

There is hope. There is progress. But more importantly, there is a renewed determination to ensure that future generations are born not just with knowledge of SCD, but with the power and tools to defeat it.(NANFeatures)

Continue Reading

Read Our ePaper

Top Stories

POLITICS2 days ago

Anambra: INEC Registers 96,085 New Voters, Extends CVR by Three Days

ShareThe Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC) said it has registered 96,085 new voters in nine days and extended the exercise...

NEWS2 days ago

Tinubu Honors Buhari, Renames University of Maiduguri after Late President

ShareBy David Torough, Abuja President Bola Tinubu has approved the renaming of the University of Maiduguri, Borno State as Muhammadu...

NEWS2 days ago

C’River First Female NUJ Chairman Describes Tenure as Trial Period

ShareThe first female Chairman of the Nigeria Union of Journalists (NUJ) in Cross River, Archibong Bassey has said that her...

NEWS2 days ago

Gov Makinde Confered With Prestigious Chieftaincy Title of Aare Omoluabi of Akure Land by Akure Kingdom

ShareThe Akure Kingdom will today bestow a prestigious chieftaincy title, Aare Omoluabi of Akure Land, meaning President of the Respectable...

POLITICS2 days ago

PDP Stakeholders Olorunda Pass Vote of Confidence on Gov Adeleke

ShareFrom Ayinde Akintade, Osogbo The Olorunda Peoples’ Democratic Party, PDP, Stakeholders has passed vote of confidence on Governor Ademola Adeleke...

NEWS2 days ago

Town Planners Task Benue Govt on Regional Devt, Master Plans

ShareBy David Torough, Abuja The President, Nigerian Institute of Town Planners (NITP), Dr. Chime Ogbonna, has urged the Benue State...

NEWS2 days ago

Illegal Detention: Court Awards Bauchi Accountant General N100m

ShareBy David Torough, Abuja In a decisive rebuke of official impunity, the Federal High Court sitting in Bauchi has declared...

NEWS2 days ago

Military Cracks Down on Terror Collaborators, Exposes Arms Trafficking by Transport Union Members

ShareBy David Torough, Abuja The Defence Headquarters (DHQ) has announced multiple breakthroughs in its ongoing counter-terrorism operations, revealing that Nigerian...

NEWS2 days ago

Peace, Order Return to Niger LG after Series of Banditry Attacks

ShareFrom Dan Amasingha, Minna Rijau Local Government Area, one of the Frontline Councils under sustained banditry attack is now heaving...

NEWS2 days ago

LG Pensions/Gratuities: Bayelsa Warns Principal Officers Against Sabotage of Quick Payment Policy

ShareFrom Mike Tayese, Yenagoa Bayelsa State Government has warned principal officers of local government councils in the state to desist...

Copyright © 2021 Daily Asset Limited | Powered by ObajeSoft Inc