Connect with us

OPINION

IPPIS: Why ASUU Should End Strike Action

Published

on

Share

By Johnson Eze

The ongoing strike action embarked on by the Academic Staff Union of Universities (ASUU) in demanding for among other issues exclusion of its members from the Integrated Personnel Payroll and Information System (IPPIS) is increasingly akin to the 19th Century labour unrest of the Irish National Union of Vinters, Grocers and Allied Trades Assistants against Downey’s pub of which notoriety is presumed the longest in history.

It began March 1939 and ended in November 1953, after a period of 14 years.


But one remarkable thing about the Irish industrial action is that when it was eventually evaluated on the basis of its benefits for both parties, it was found to have achieved nothing specific as the demand of re-instating a staff of the Downey’s Pub, which underlie the strike action, was never complied with at last.

On the other hand, the pub owner did not lose much as he later sold the place and moved on with his life.


These are lessons for ASUU to learn to resolve to call off the strike action in the interest of academia. It needs, first and foremost, to appreciate the damage its incessant strike actions has so far inflicted on the integrity of the lecturers and on the Nigerian University system itself. It is doubtless enormous. Against this reality, it behooves on it therefore to instigate a process for eventual repairs by calling off the strike action, which we consider as first step towards any negotiation move between it and government.


The nation’s Ivory Tower is their own home or niche carved out for them by fate. They shouldn’t destroy it and expect to retain their honor or lead a comfortably happy life, for like fish and water, the quality and standard of these esteemed institutions should be seen to stick together with university lecturers through thick and thin.

Almost certainly, most of the demands center around money and money. There is no gain saying that money is central but isn’t everything. Value and insight should be the central focus. The strike action will and cannot get them fulfilled, though a legitimate instrument to press for better condition of service in any country. It is seldom the ultimate than propriety cultivated within the context of the economic reality.


When the lecturers recognize this scenario and attempt to be more disposed to voice of reason by going back to class, whether or not their demand has been met, government will by no means fail to cede to their demand. Again, industrial strike by any organized labour or trade union enjoys universal legitimacy as a weapon against oppression by employers of labour, but how ill-advised it will seem when its application does not take cognizance of the existing reality in the country.


Another point is the question of rationality of contending issues. How can ASUU add as one of its demands the termination of the Office of the Accountant General of the Federation, OAGF-operated IPPIS. Does it make any argument? One doubts if it does; and on this basis one will like to discountenance with the idea behind the call to discontinue with OAGF and attempt to see the call as ill-advised.

With all modesty, there is no place in the world where employee dictates for the employer the way to run his organizations. In this case, the Federal Government, which owns universities, is the employer and the ASSU is its employee. It is strange and inexplicable that the University lecturers want to be calling the shots. Come to think of it, some of these lecturers are technically moonlighting and thus cannot be said to be completely loyal to their employer.

Back to the AGF operated IPPIS: the programme is a computer-based automatic payment platform. It enables government to determine exact numbers of staff in its payroll for prompt and actual wage payment. The system’s usefulness is seen in its capacity to provide for proper planning of payment.
When the question of the IPPIS was conceptualized as a means to streamline government salary payment, it was dream come true that government has a system that determines a number of personnel in its payroll. In this regime, government, for the first time, is fighting corruption in its salary payment.


There is currently an air of transparency and accountability as well as efficiency in resource management of the Ministry, Department and Agencies (MDAs) of government. Until recently the syndrome of ghost workers was a recurring one in the Federal Civil Service. But through government determination to weed them off the phenomenal has become a thing of the past, least talk of today.


It thus is worrisome that ASUU has gone on rampage against operation of the payment platform. In fact, ASUU has even developed their own payment platform which they called University Transparency and Accountability Solution, UTAS. It is agitating for it to be used to replace IPPIS even when the UTAS has failed integrity test conducted by National Information Technology Development Agency (NITDA). NITDA is the regulatory body for software and information technology sector.


But beyond the question of UTAS failing the integrity test, is it proper for employees, through a labor union, to arrogate to themselves the management role of salary payment? ASUU should begin to recognize and respect the authorities that exists in the governance and ownership structure of universities and by so doing instill the much-expected discipline in the system. This is by returning to classroom immediately as various authorities have advised them. Their grievances have been noted and discussion is on-going. As earlier observed in several instances, conflicts, fights and wars most often do not solve problems. It is friendly discussion and mutual respect that is the secret.


Unlike the Irish National Union that cared little about the consequences and ultimately went on a 14-year strike, ASUU, being a body of intellectuals, should rethink and call of the strike action. It is an evil wind that blows none any good. Good name they say is better than silver or gold. The strike means that ASUU has expressed its grievances and interestingly enough government has responded by meeting and negotiating with it. The best it could do at this juncture is call off the strike action while negotiation continues. There should be a limit to every endeavor no matter how good or justified.


Again, ASUU should by now be on the search for alternative conflict resolution mechanism. Returning to work and engaging the FG in continuous and intensive negotiation in a friendly atmosphere, I think will be more persuasive in achieving lecturers demands. Like Jim Rohn, the prolific American Author, great motivational speaker and an advocate of self-discipline in achieving one’s ambition at home and business once stated “You don’t get paid for the hour. You get paid for the value you bring to the hour.” The earlier ASUU explores this option the better for it as a stitch in time saves nine.

Eze is the publisher of Instant Africa News Magazine (print & online) and writes from Abuja

OPINION

This Trial of Oloyede

Published

on

Share

By Tunde Akanni

It’s been traumatic for my entire family since that video started making the rounds. I sneaked a slight view… It’s our trial. It’s my trial. Oloyede is genuine. He is most sincere. He is modestly so, as well. For us, however, Allah knows best.

I was with a trader in the afternoon of what I considered a dark Wednesday, the 14th of May.
“Se bi won ni JAMB o get mo bayi…”.
I had to cut in immediately. Which JAMB? “Madam, that’s one person I will vouch, and vouch for…zero tolerance for corruption. Absolutely responsible with a high level of consciousness for the good of others. If certain things went wrong at JAMB, I agree it’s his responsibility to carry all pleasant and other burdens but just know that the bad side of the operations may as well be sabotage.
I have absolute trust in that man. Ask my own colleagues about me, but Oloyede is my own hero, somebody I have known for more than 40 years…”This is by no means a reductionist disposition to the tragedy induced by the so-called computer glitch. May the Almighty God in His infinite mercy console the parents of the candidate reported to have committed suicide. May God strengthen them to survive this gloomy phase of their lives and sustain them to reap bountiful compensation that will endure in their lives. It’s hard, so hard to pull tragedies of this magnitude. I personally feel for these parents.The said computer glitch, may we never fall victim to it. Those who work for big organisations requiring a large layout of ICT operations know what I’m talking about. Rather than being ‘solutional’, IT facilities can be unimaginably problematic sometimes, yet indispensable in this civilisational dispensation. This is not doubting deliberate sabotage, as may have happened in the case of JAMB. I’ve been part of Oloyede’s JAMB journey to attest to his commitment to offer his best for the otherwise sinking board.Far from being cosmetically exhibitionist, the Oloyede-led JAMB team, led by the Education minister, Tunji Alausa, went round the critical facilities of JAMB during the just concluded examination. Alausa saw, firsthand, like never before elsewhere in this country, how far JAMB had gone in its strive for transparency and the real-time monitoring of the conduct of examinations nationwide. Alausa, beyond being in awe, sought to make the JAMB effect spread immediately to other examination bodies.No be dem say, same day, the WAEC team came to JAMB and made it into the situation room, which was my own duty post. The NECO team followed suit afterwards, both duly led around by the sturdy lead IT consultant who’s been reliably there from Oloyede’s assumption of duty, Damilola Bamiro. Far richer, given that they charge more for their exams, the duo of WAEC and NECO were suddenly mandated to understudy the examination sector leader in Africa that JAMB has become over time.The staff of both WAEC and NECO suddenly had to undertake a professional excursion led through all the real time monitoring screens and other digital facilities. It was obvious they marvelled at what they saw, revealing a functional leader-subordinate synergy manifest with trendy output that the world can see and learn from.But that may even seem like the tip of the iceberg of the output of the hard work and commitment of the nation’s foremost icon of integrity in public service. A series of far more seemingly serious strides had been accomplished by Oloyede at JAMB. As a focused scholar, he keeps ensuring that every bit of the experience of the Board is treasured as worthy data to guide future actions and even subjects for further research.Not even the agencies dedicated to emergency matters in Nigeria could have been as prompt as the Oloyede management on this ugly glitch saga. Once the complainants began ventilating into the public space, JAMB rose to the challenge without any predictably traditional arrogant stance of government is always right. I was aware that a particularly strident public critic and a former students’ leader at Obafemi Awolowo University, Adeola Soetan commended the spokesperson for JAMB for the excellent handling of public complaints.Promptly, an independent team of investigators was set up to unravel the mystery leading to the rather depressing situation that now confronts us. The team, drawn from assorted but technically relevant constituencies, has found out that no fewer than 165 centres of over 800 examination centres nationwide were affected.Obviously well prepared for whatever the outcome may turn out to be, he braced up to the challenge to embrace the surrender value to tell it to the world as it is. This trial is for all of us who believe and trust Oloyede. I am in this group. So much so that his public cry infected me…It was a patriot’s cry for his beloved country. Like me, a former Law don at LASU, Dr Kilani wasn’t any less affected as demonstrated in a quick note to me: “I write to associate myself with the pain, sorrow and emotion of our own Professor Oloyede. I could not hold my tears seeing him cry. May Almighty Allah see him through. May we all not be put to shame…”But then came a soothing message from Gbade Osunsoko, my cousin: “…He will come out of this much stronger because Nigerians will trust him far better than a number of our leaders.. A man that makes mistakes happens under him and takes responsibility – it’s a big deal in Nigeria.”With Oloyede, young Nigerians with challenges regarding sight are no longer left to moan their fate endlessly, with adequate provision for their inclusion in the UTME. How many of our public facilities are this inclusion conscious as stipulated by SDGs? How come a legacy built through almost a decade at the very best cost ever possible will be made to crumble when the game changer leader remains ever modest? JAMB has steadily risen through thick and thin to accomplish its tasks to the admiration of stakeholders, nationally and internationally, under Oloyede. Both NNPC and the Nigeria Police, being beneficiaries, can attest to the current competence of JAMB. How many other numerous stakeholders nationwide never deemed to have any relevance to JAMB before Oloyede but have since become critical, if not indispensable players?But why does this sudden saddening encounter threaten our joy of service without blemish? Why this unforeseen truncation of a good story, so intentional, coming from Africa? Whodunnit? Surely the truth shall come out for the world to perceive and assess and get to appreciate the efforts and the quantum of commitment appropriated to the JAMB excellence project driven by Oloyede.One cannot but be deeply concerned. Before the very eyes of a few of us carefully selected to give support from our respective professional perspectives from the very beginning, Professor Oloyede’s concern for genuine growth and development was real. It is still real and increasingly so, as a matter of fact. Indeed, inimitable. It shall be well.Tunde Akanni is a professor of Journalism and Development Communications at the Lagos State University, LASU. Follow him on X:@AkintundeAkanni

Continue Reading

OPINION

Democracy, Institutions, and the Rule of Law

Published

on

Quest For Enduring Democracy in Nigeria
Share

By Kator Ifyalem

Democracy, often hailed as the cornerstone of modern governance, is a system that empowers citizens to participate in the decision-making processes that shape their lives. However, the mere existence of elections is not enough to ensure a fair, just, and prosperous society.

Without robust institutions, the rule of law, and ingrained values, democracy can become a hollow shell, susceptible to corruption, manipulation, and eventual collapse.
At its core, democracy is built on the principle that power resides with the people. This power is exercised through fair elections, where citizens choose representatives to govern on their behalf. The effectiveness of this system relies heavily on the strength of supporting institutions, adherence to the rule of law, and shared values that guide societal behaviour.
Institutions serve as the backbone of a democratic society, translating the will of the people into action. These include governmental bodies such as the legislature, executive, and judiciary, as well as independent organizations like electoral commissions, anti-corruption agencies, and human rights commissions. These institutions provide checks and balances, ensuring that no single entity or individual can accumulate too much power. They create a framework for accountability, transparency, and effective governance.An independent judiciary is crucial for upholding the constitution and protecting individual rights. Without it, laws can be manipulated or ignored by those in power, leading to tyranny. Similarly, a free and independent media acts as a watchdog, informing citizens and holding those in power accountable. When media institutions are weakened or controlled by vested interests, the flow of information is compromised, and citizens are unable to make informed decisions.The rule of law is another critical component of a functioning democracy. It ensures that all citizens, regardless of their status or position, are subject to the same laws and legal processes. This principle is fundamental to creating a fair and just society where everyone’s rights are protected. A robust legal framework, consistently and fairly enforced, provides the predictability and security necessary for social and economic development. It protects property rights, enforces contracts, and creates an environment conducive to investment and growth.Moreover, the rule of law is essential for protecting minority rights and preventing the tyranny of the majority. In a true democracy, the rights of all citizens must be respected, even if they are not part of the ruling majority. This protection is enshrined in laws and enforced through effective legal institutions.Values form the third pillar of an effective democracy. These shared beliefs and principles guide societal behaviour and inform policy-making. Democratic values include respect for human rights, tolerance of diversity, commitment to justice, and belief in the equality of all citizens. When these values are deeply ingrained, they act as a safeguard against authoritarian tendencies and help preserve the integrity of democratic institutions.For instance, a healthy democracy can be likened to a three-legged stool, where institutions, the rule of law, and democratic values form the legs. Just as a stool cannot stand stably without all three legs being strong and balanced, a democracy cannot function effectively if any of these elements is weak or missing. In Nigeria’s case, we’ve seen how weaknesses in one area, such as institutional challenges in election management, can put stress on the other legs, requiring the judiciary (rule of law) and civil society (democratic values) to bear more weight to maintain stability.Education plays a crucial role in instilling these values. A well-informed citizenry, aware of their rights and responsibilities, is better equipped to participate meaningfully in the democratic process. Civic education programs that teach the principles of democracy, the importance of institutions, and the value of the rule of law are essential for creating engaged and responsible citizens.The interplay between institutions, the rule of law, and values creates a self-reinforcing cycle that strengthens democracy. However, this cycle can also work in reverse. Weak institutions often lead to a breakdown in the rule of law, eroding democratic values and further weakening the system. This negative spiral will ultimately lead to the collapse of governance, even if the outward trappings of democracy remain.To prevent this decline, concerted effort is required on multiple fronts. Institutional capacity must be built and maintained through adequate funding, training, and support. The rule of law must be consistently enforced, with mechanisms in place to address corruption and abuse of power. This requires not only strong legal frameworks but also a commitment to their implementation.International cooperation also plays a role in strengthening democracy. Countries learn from each other’s experiences, share best practices, and provide support for development. However, it’s crucial to recognize that democracy cannot be imposed from outside; it must be nurtured from within.True democracy requires more than just the act of voting; it demands a comprehensive system of governance that respects the rights of all citizens, upholds justice, and promotes the common good. Strengthening these fundamental pillars (institutions, the rule of law, and values), is crucial in building more resilient, effective, and truly representative democracies that serve the needs of all citizens and contribute to global stability and prosperity. Where does Nigeria as a nation stand on this scale?

Continue Reading

OPINION

Reshaping Nigeria’s Student Loans for Inclusive Access

Published

on

Share

By Tosin Kolade

In June 2023, President Bola Tinubu signed the Student Loan (Access to Higher Education) Act into law, marking an important step forward in the country’s approach to financing tertiary education.The initiative was designed to provide interest-free loans to students in higher institutions, thereby expanding access to education for financially disadvantaged youth.

However, nearly two years on, the scheme’s implementation remains burdened by challenges, prompting growing concern and debate among stakeholders.
In response to criticism of the original law, the Federal Government repealed and re-enacted the Act in April 2024.The revised legislation established the Nigerian Education Loan Fund (NELFUND) as a corporate entity responsible for managing and disbursing the loans.
Notably, the amended version eliminated restrictive eligibility criteria such as income thresholds and guarantor requirements.It also extended the scheme’s coverage to include students enrolled in government-accredited vocational training centres.To streamline access, the application process was simplified, requiring only a valid National Identification Number (NIN) and Bank Verification Number (BVN).Hence, all submissions were made via the NELFUND portal.In spite of these improvements, the scheme has continued to attract criticism.One of its most vocal opponents is the Academic Staff Union of Universities (ASUU).In a recent interview with a national daily, Dr Mwolwus Jurbe, Chairman of ASUU’s University of Jos chapter, outlined the initiative as “fundamentally flawed”.He argued that the scheme was unlikely to benefit its target groups, especially students from low-income families.“The scheme is pushing education out of the reach of the common man,” he said.Jurbe said that, amid high unemployment rates and soaring tuition fees, expecting repayments from indigent students was unrealistic.ASUU also raised alarms over reports that TETFund allocations might be redirected to fund NELFUND.The body warned that dismantling a functional funding mechanism in favour of an untested alternative could jeopardise the future of tertiary education in Nigeria.Meanwhile, the National Association of Nigerian Students (NANS), while generally supportive, has also expressed reservations.The association acknowledged the potential of the scheme to reduce dropout rates, but emphasised that the absence of scholarships or grants rendered it incomplete.NANS President, Comrade Olushola Ladoja, condemned the alleged mismanagement of NELFUND, calling for the dismissal of implicated officials and the publication of the 51 tertiary institutions reportedly involved.“Any vice-chancellor, rector or provost found culpable in the mismanagement of student loans must be removed from office.“Their actions sabotage the Federal Government’s effort to make education accessible to all,’’ Ladoja said.He urged Tinubu to probe the reported diversion of N71.2 billion and criticised NELFUND for excluding the national student leadership from key stakeholder engagements.Additionally, NANS called on the EFCC and ICPC to investigate the matter and advocated for a five-year post-NYSC loan repayment grace period, citing the employment difficulties faced by many recent graduates.Civil society groups have also raised concerns.The Education Rights Campaign (ERC) described the initiative as “badly thought-out, ill-conceived and fundamentally unworkable”.Hassan Soweto, National Coordinator of the ERC, lamented repeated delays in the loan rollout, calling it evidence of poor planning and political inertia.“It is a national embarrassment that almost a year after the law was signed, students are still waiting for funds,” he said.Worthy on note, trust in the scheme further eroded in August 2024 when it was revealed that no tertiary institution in the South-East had been included in the first phase of disbursements.Reacting, the Concerned Igbo Stakeholders Forum (CISF), led by Chukwuma Okenwa, condemned the omission as a deliberate act of marginalisation.Okenwa argued that excluding an entire geopolitical zone from a national programme violated the federal character principle.Although NELFUND claimed South-East schools had failed to respond to verification notices, the CISF rejected this explanation, insisting that at least one compliant institution should have been selected.Similarly, the Corporate Accountability and Public Participation Africa (CAPPA) expressed concern over NELFUND’s plan to limit eligibility to students in “high-demand” disciplines.Zikora Ibeh, CAPPA’s Senior Programme Manager, warned that the policy could marginalise students in the humanities, arts, and social sciences.“This approach risks deepening inequality by denying support to students whose fields may not be seen as immediately profitable but are crucial to national development,” she said.Also, controversy followed the announcement that the EFCC had donated N50 billion in recovered funds to the loan scheme.A Legal expert, Nnaemeka Ejiofor, cautioned that while well-intentioned, the EFCC lacked constitutional authority to reallocate recovered public funds without National Assembly approval.“Such actions, no matter how well-meaning, set a dangerous precedent,” he warned.Meanwhile, fee hikes across federal and state universities have exacerbated the financial burden on students and their families.In some cases, tuition fees have surged by as much as 1,000 per cent.A University of Lagos student, Michelle Njemanze, shared that her tuition rose from N16,000 to N196,000 in a single academic session.For many, the student loan scheme remains a promise yet to be fulfilled.Although the Tinubu administration allocated N200 billion to the scheme in the 2024 budget and appointed banking executive Jim Ovia as chairman of the NELFUND board, disbursement delays continued well into May 2025.In response to growing dissatisfaction, NELFUND recently announced a major overhaul of its application system.NELFUND Chief Executive Officer, Mr Akintunde Sawyerr, recently revealed that the agency was deploying a fully digitised, user-friendly platform to streamline the loan process and eliminate bureaucratic delays.“Education is a right, not a privilege; with this technology-driven model, we are establishing a transparent and efficient system that puts students first,” he said.Sawyerr added that the reforms aligned with Tinubu’s Renewed Hope Agenda, which prioritised educational access and youth empowerment.According to him, more than 320,000 students had already benefited from the scheme, with thousands more undergoing verification as operations scale-up.Looking ahead, NELFUND also plans to integrate its systems with institutional portals across the country.This collaboration aims to enable seamless data exchange, automate student record verification, and speed up loan processing.While recent reforms are encouraging, experts insist that sustained political will, transparency, and inclusive policies are essential to realise the full potential of Nigeria’s student loan scheme.They agree that, in theory, the loan scheme offers a vital opportunity to democratise access to higher education in Nigeria.In practice, however, its rollout has been hindered by legal ambiguities, implementation delays, and regional inequities.If these challenges remain unresolved, experts warn, the scheme may end up widening the very educational gap it was intended to close. (NAN)

Continue Reading

Read Our ePaper

Top Stories

Foreign News26 minutes ago

Taraba 2025 Appropriation Provides for Budget Funding Through Loans-Lawmaker

ShareThe Taraba House of Assembly has said that it’s approval for the Executive to secure a N350 billion bond from...

NEWS33 minutes ago

NDDC Seeks Legal Advocacy to Accelerate Niger Delta Development

ShareThe Niger Delta Development Commission (NDDC) has emphasised that legal advocacy on issues affecting the Niger Delta holds the potential...

NEWS39 minutes ago

TMSG Hails FG’s Cash Transfer to 15m Vulnerable Households

ShareThe Tinubu Media Support Group (TMSG) has hailed the fast-track disbursement of funds to 15 million households under the Conditional...

NEWS45 minutes ago

UTME Glitches: Oloyede Deserves Commendation, not Condemnation, Says Group

ShareThe Muslim Ummah of the South West of Nigeria (MUSWEN) says Prof. Ishaq Oloyede, the Registrar,Joint Admissions and Matriculation Board...

NEWS50 minutes ago

NAHCON Airlifts 20,515 Nigerian Pilgrims to Saudi Arabia in one Week

Share The National Hajj Commission of Nigeria (NAHCON) says it has transported 20,515 Nigerian pilgrims to the Kingdom of Saudi...

NEWS2 hours ago

Murder of Lawyer: Anambra NBA Orders Boycott of Sittings May 20-21

ShareThe Nigerian Bar Association (NBA) Anambra Chapter has condemned gruesome murder of its member, Mr Ifeanyi-Rolex Iloakasia.Iloakasia, a member of...

NEWS2 hours ago

Dada Highlights Milestones as FMC Medical Director

ShareDr Adedamola Dada, outgoing Medical Director of Federal Medical Centre, Ebute Metta, said the hospital exported its best practices to...

NEWS2 hours ago

Tinubu Commits to Curbing Insurgency

Share President Bola Tinubu on Friday reaffirmed the commitment of his administration to roundly countering insurgency in the country.The president...

NEWS2 hours ago

Nigeria’s Enemies’ll Soon be Brought to Their Knees — COAS

ShareThe Chief of Army Staff, (COAS), Lt.-Gen. Olufemi Oluyede, said the enemies of Nigeria would soon be brought to their...

Health16 hours ago

FG Promises Access To Eye Care For Every Nigerian

Share Dr Iziaq Salako, the Minister of State for Health and Social Welfare says the Federal Government will ensure that...

Copyright © 2021 Daily Asset Limited | Powered by ObajeSoft Inc