Featured
Timeline of Kidnap Kingpin Evans’s Trial
News of arrest of kidnap kingpin, Chukwudimeme Onwuamadike (alias Evans) by the police on June 10, 2017, dominated Nigeria’s media space the following 12 hours and beyond. His trial continued to hold the attention of the media and the general public.
Evans was arrested at his residence at No.
3, Fred Shogboyede St, Magodo, Lagos.He was accused by the then DCP Abba Kyari-led Inspector-General of Police Intelligence Response Team (IRT) of kidnapping high profile Nigerians and demanding huge ransoms in foreign currencies for their release.
His four and a half years’ trial before an Ikeja High Court was plagued by delays caused by applications filed by counsel as well as Evans’s frequent change of counsel and the lockdown necessitated by the COVID-19 pandemic.
The 64-day strike in 2021 by the Judiciary Staff Union of Nigeria (JUSUN) also contributed to the delay.
Here is a timeline of the trial which culminated in a judgment on Friday with the court convicting him and sentencing him to life imprisonment.
The trial is of the five trials the kidnap kingpin and his accomplices are facing before the High Courts in Lagos State.
AUG. 30, 2017
Evans and five others: Uche Amadi, Ogechi Uchechukwu, Okwuchukwu Nwachukwu, Chilaka Ifeanyi and Victor Aduba were charged on two counts of conspiracy and kidnapping before Justice Hakeem Oshodi of an Ikeja High Court.
Evans, Amadi and Nwachukwu pleaded guilty to the charges while Uchechukwu, the only female defendant, Ifeanyi and Aduba pleaded not guilty.
According to prosecution team led by the then Lagos State Attorney-General and Commissioner for Justice, Mr Adeniji Kazeem, Evans and his accomplices kidnapped the Chief Executive Officer (CEO) of Maydon Pharmaceuticals, Mr Donatus Dunu, on Feb. 14, 2017, and received 223,000 euros as ransom for his release.
Five of the defendants were remanded at the then Kirikiri Maximum Security Prison while Uchechukwu, the only female defendant, was remanded at the then Kirikiri Female Prison.
OCT. 19, 2017
Evans and his co-defendants were re-arraigned on an amended two-count charge of conspiracy and kidnapping.
The defendants were earlier charged under Sections 271(3) and 411 of the Criminal Law of Lagos State, 2015. On Oct.19, 2017, they were charged under Section 2(1) of the Kidnapping Prohibition Law, No. 13, Laws of Lagos State, 2017, and Section 411 of the Criminal Law of Lagos State, 2015.
In a dramatic turn of events, Evans pleaded not guilty.
NOV. 3, 2017
Anselem Dunu, Donatus Dunu’s brother, testified as the first prosecution witness in the trial. He narrated how he raised N100 million and converted it to 223,000 euros as ransom for his brother’s release.
Oshodi dismissed an application filed by Evans’s counsel, Mr Olukoya Ogungbeje, seeking to quash the two-count charge brought against him by Lagos State Government.
NOV. 17, 2017
Evans and his co-defendants complained about their living conditions at the Kirikiri Prisons, to Oshodi.
“This is unfair, I have not been given food and change of clothes. I was not given the opportunity to bathe since Wednesday,” he said.
Oshodi ordered the then Director in Lagos State Directorate of Public Prosecutions (DPP), Ms. Titilayo Shitta-Bey, to investigate the accusation. The judge also dismissed a bail application of Uchechukwu, the only female defendant.
JAN. 19, 2018
Anselem’s cross-examination could not commence because Nwachukwu, a co-defendant, had yet to secure legal representation.
MARCH 2, 2018
One of Evans co-defendants, Victor Aduba, an ex-soldier, was refused bail.
Oshodi had considered the gravity of the alleged offences and the possibility of interfering with trial, before arriving at the decision.
Oshodi, in a separate ruling, foreclosed Okwuchukwu Nwachukwu’s chance of cross-examining Anselem due to his unwillingness to cross-examine him by himself as he had no legal representation.
MARCH 16, 2018
Donatius Dunu, the CEO of Maydon Pharmaceuticals and the complainant in the case, testified in the trial as the second prosecution witness.
He narrated how he was abducted at 7.30 p.m. on Obokun Street, Ilupeju, Lagos, while heading home from work. He said that an initial ransom of two million dollars was demanded, and his hands and feet were shackled during his 88-day stay in captivity.
He said that due to a fluctuation in dollar rate, the ransom was changed to one million euros which was negotiated down to 500,000 euros. He testified that his brother, Anselem, was able to raise 223,000 euros.
He said he escaped from captivity while his captors were asleep, and alerted the authorities. He was cross-examined by Evans’s counsel.
MAY 11, 2018
The third prosecution witness and a Manager at Maydon Pharmaceuticals Ltd., Mr Uchenna Okagwu, narrated how he paid 232,000 euros as ransom to Evans and his accomplices to secure the release of his boss. The money was dropped off at a location at Okota, Lagos.
“As I walked to the back of my vehicle, I was three steps away, I was asked to drop the ransom, I did so and was told to move immediately after dropping the money.
“As I looked around, I only saw a vehicle parked at the beginning of the street with full lights on, the vehicle looked like an SUV.”
Under cross-examination by Ogungbeje, Okagwu said he didn’t see anyone while dropping the ransom and that the money was not given directly to any person.
SEPT 11, 2018
The fourth prosecution witness, Insp Idowu Haruna of the Intelligence Response Team, told the court that the defendants were arrested following Donatus Dunu’s escape from captivity.
Led in evidence by state counsel, Mr Adebayo Haroun, the investigating police officer said that the statements of the defendants were not obtained under duress but rather in a conducive environment.
Evans’s new counsel, Mr Chinonye Obiagwu, however, opposed the admissibility of the statements on the premise that they were obtained under duress. This prompted Oshodi to order a trial-within-trial.
OCT 26, 2018
Taking the stand at the trial-within-trial, Evans claimed that his confessional statement to the police was not obtained voluntarily.
He claimed that policemen tortured him and made him to witness executions in a bid to get him to admit to the alleged crimes.
FEB. 1, 2019
In a ruling, Oshodi admitted Evans’s June 11, 2017 confessional statement in evidence, saying that there was no proof before the court that he was tortured by the police.
The judge noted that the 1999 Constitution did not require that statements to the police must be in a specific form, adding that based on Evans’s videotaped confession played in court during the trial, there was no proof he was tortured to provide details of his misdeeds.
JAN. 11, 2020
Concluding his evidence, Haruna narrated how Evans spent the ransom he collected from his victims.
“The ransoms collected by the first defendant were used for purchasing houses on Magodo Estate, Lagos, where he was arrested. He also bought a house on Emmanuel Keshi Street on Magodo Estate.
“He bought a house located in Accra, Ghana. The first defendant also bought landed property in Anambra State from the ransom,” he said.
After Haruna’s testimony, Haroun told the court that prosecution would be closing its case against the defendants.
AUG. 14, 2020
Oshodi gave a ruling on a no-case submission filed by Evans’s co-defendants, Uchechukwu, Ifeanyi, Nwachukwu and Aduba.
He said the co-defendants had a case to answer due to substantial evidence before the court. He ordered them to open their defence.
After the ruling, the judge ordered Evans’s new counsel, Mr Oyekunle Falabi, from the law chambers of Victor Opara (SAN) to write an undertaking that the law chambers would conclude the case.
The judge said Evans had developed a habit of engaging services of lawyers who “disappear halfway through trial”, noting that it was causing delays in the case.
Since the trial began on Aug. 30, 2017, Evans had been represented at different times by Mr Olukoya Ogungbeje, Mr Noel Brown, Mr Chinonye Obiagwu and Mr Olanrewaju Ajanaku, all of whom withdrew from the case.
JAN 22, 2021
Evans opened his defence. He denied allegations of conspiracy and kidnapping against him, insisting that he was a legitimate businessman.
Led in defence by his counsel, Opara, he said: “My lord, my name is not Evans, and I don’t have a nickname. I’m a legitimate businessman who deals in haulage and ornaments.”
He said he was coerced into admitting being a kidnapper after the police, in a bid to make him to confess, extra-judicially killed four individuals in his presence.
He also testified that he had never met the other defendants, except on the day the police paraded them before the media at Area F, Police Command, Ikeja.
JUNE 29, 2021
Evans’s sister, Mrs Ndubuisi Obiechina, testified as the second defence witness. Led in evidence by Opara, she told the court that her brother was tortured by IRT operatives to confess to the crimes.
Evans co-defendants, Uche Amadi and Ogechi Uchechukwu, a married couple, also presented their defence.
Amadi told the court that he was arrested alongside his wife in Port Harcourt, adding that he had never been to Lagos and that he did not know or have any relationship with Evans.
Uchechukwu who married Amadi in 2004, in her defence, disputed her husband’s claim.
“If anyone comes to this court and says that Amadi has never been to Lagos except in 2017 when he was arrested, then that person must be lying,” she said.
AUG. 3, 2021
Evans’s co-defendants, Ifeanyi and Aduba, two ex soldiers of the Nigerian Army, denied being accomplices.
Responding to questions from Opara, Ifeanyi said, “I have never taken part in any kidnap activities in my life. I have never attempted to kidnap anyone before or conspired with Evans to kidnap the victim (Dunu).”
Aduba, led in evidence by his counsel, Mr Emmanuel Ochai, said he was forced to sign a confessional statement in police custody after three men — Felix Chinemeren, Paul Samyan and Chukwuma Nwosu — who were initially paraded to the media as kidnappers, were extra-judicially killed by an IRT team.
Following the evidence of the two former soldiers, defence closed its case.
DEC. 10, 2021
Oshodi announced Feb. 25, 2022, as judgment date, after listening to oral submissions of final written addresses by prosecution and defence counsel.
Opara (SAN), in a final written address dated Nov.1, 2021, said there was no evidence directly linking Evans to the alleged crimes. He said that the kidnap victim, who was blindfolded throughout his 88-day ordeal, did not state in his testimony in court that he could physically identify Evans.
Haroun, via a final written address dated Nov. 30, 2021, asked the court to convict the defendants, saying that the kidnap victim had given direct evidence about how he was kidnapped, how he escaped and the roles of each defendant.
“We have circumstantial evidence linking the first defendant (Evans) to the crime and we also have confessional statements and video recordings of him,” Haroun said.
FEB. 25, 2022
Oshodi, in a three-hour judgment, found Evans, Amadi and Nwachukwu guilty of the two-count charge of conspiracy and kidnapping brought against them by Lagos State Government.
He said that none of the convicts showed any remorse during the trial.
“Despite the huge evidence stacked against them, they tried to lie their way out.
“In this respect, the first, second and fourth defendants are each hereby sentenced to life imprisonment. This is the sentence of the court,” he said.
Other defendants – Uchechukwu and the two ex-soldiers – Ifeanyi and Aduba – were discharged and acquitted. The judge held that there was no evidence linking them to the crimes.(NAN)
Featured
Safeguarding Nigerians against AI Fakes and Digital Fraud
By Tolu Aiyegbusi
As Artificial Intelligence (AI) continues to advance, creating highly realistic voices, faces, and even emotions, Nigerians are becoming vulnerable to scams, identity theft, and privacy violations.
Experts warn that the rapid adoption of AI technology has outpaced regulatory safeguards, leaving individuals vulnerable to digital manipulation.
At the same time, they stress that vigilance, improved digital literacy, and stronger laws can help citizens safeguard their privacy.
AI-generated deepfakes and synthetic media, once the realm of science fiction, have gradually become a powerful tool in the hands of cybercriminals.
According to global projections, deepfake files are expected to grow from approximately 500,000 in 2023 to nearly 8 million by 2025.
Fraud attempts using AI-generated content have surged more than 2,000 per cent over the last three years.
Detecting these digital replicas is extremely difficult, as humans correctly identify fake videos only 24 per cent of the time, according to studies.
Therefore, experts warn that without robust safeguards, AI could be weaponized to manipulate everything from personal finances to political narratives.
In Nigeria, where digital literacy is still developing, these threats are becoming more common.
“Identity hijacks,” in which someone’s likeness is used without their consent, are now becoming a growing concern in Nigeria.
For instance, in one notable case, Fatima Falana, a small business owner in Abuja, wired N50, 000 following a Zoom call she believed came from her former boss.
Unbeknownst to her, the call was an AI-generated deepfake that perfectly replicated her ex-boss’s voice and appearance.
Similarly, Ifeoma Jack, a Lagos-based entrepreneur, transferred N500, 000 after receiving a call from someone impersonating her brother.
“I was shaken,” she said. “I didn’t know what to do”.
These incidents reveal a global trend.
Indeed, in developed markets, surveys indicate that one in four people has received a deep fake voice call in the past year, while nearly a quarter are unsure if they can tell an AI-generated voice from a real one.
Senior citizens are more susceptible, often losing significant sums once deceived.
Moreover, in the United States, AI-related cybercrime cost an estimated $16.6 billion in 2024, marking a 33 per cent increase from 2023.
Across Africa, identity fraud has surged by 167 per cent, with Nigeria contributing a major share of these cases.
Overall, deepfakes now account for about 7 per cent of all fraud attempts, a dramatic rise from near-zero just a few years ago.
Experts say regulatory frameworks have struggled to keep pace with AI’s rapid evolution.
For example, while the EU AI Act, which came into effect in March 2026, mandates clear labeling of AI-generated content, many countries, including Nigeria, are still finalising laws to tackle these emerging threats.
In Nigeria, the National Digital Economy & E-Governance Bill, currently nearing enactment, will empower the National Information Technology Development Agency (NITDA) to shut down non-compliant platforms.
Additionally, it promotes “biometric sovereignty” by exploring blockchain-based proof of personhood protocols to ensure that digital interactions originate from real humans, not AI servers.
Until such measures are fully operational, the burden of privacy protection falls largely on individuals.
Cybersecurity experts emphasise that citizens must adopt practical measures to safeguard their identities.
In particular, families are now using ‘safe words’; or unique phrases spoken only in person to verify identities during phone calls.
Dr Aisha Mohammed, a cybersecurity expert at the University of Abuja, advised that “limit access to your personal data and be wary of suspicious calls, even from familiar voices.
“Use strong passwords, enable two-factor authentication, and keep security software updated.
“Your privacy is compromised when AI can recreate your voice, face, or identity without consent”.
Furthermore, she stressed that public education campaigns are crucial to ensuring citizens understand the evolving threats posed by AI-generated content.
Media experts warn that the impact of deepfakes extends beyond individual financial loss.
Dr James Olabode, a media studies professor at the University of Lagos, noted that the erosion of authenticity threatens public trust in information.
“If people can’t trust what they see or hear, what’s left?” he asked.
In addition, political deepfakes can fuel misinformation, inflame social tensions, and manipulate public opinion.
For instance, in 2022, a video purportedly showing a Nigerian politician making inflammatory remarks went viral, causing widespread outrage, only to be later identified as a deepfake.
Dr Samuel Adeyemi, AI researcher at the African University of Science and Technology, urged citizens to verify information before sharing it online.
“Use fact-checking tools and report any suspicious deepfake content to the authorities. Awareness and early reporting can reduce the impact of these attacks,” he said.
Legal experts stress that personal vigilance must be complemented by strong legislation.
Barrister Emeka Nwosu, a tech policy lawyer in Abuja, explained that digital “breadcrumbs”; from TikTok videos to LinkedIn photos, are being harvested by bots to create near-perfect AI replicas.
“Regulatory frameworks should mandate transparency in AI-generated content, impose penalties for malicious use, and ensure accountability from tech companies,” he said.
While AI offers efficiency and convenience, experts emphasise that citizens must cultivate a culture of digital caution.
Specifically, this includes limiting the sharing of personal information, educating families and employees about AI impersonation risks, and adopting verification measures like safe words or biometric confirmation.
Moreover, organisations handling sensitive data are urged to deploy AI-detection tools, continuously update cybersecurity protocols, and participate in public awareness campaigns.
The rise of AI-generated fakes also presents an opportunity to strengthen regulatory capacity.
Consequently, Nigeria’s government, in collaboration with cybersecurity and tech experts, is exploring national AI guidelines that will require companies to label synthetic media, implement user consent protocols, and report breaches promptly.
Experts believe that such initiatives, combined with public awareness, can reduce the frequency and impact of identity theft, online fraud, and reputational damage.
As AI continues to evolve, Nigerians are at a critical juncture.
By implementing proactive laws, fostering informed citizens, and adopting careful digital practices, the country can navigate this era without compromising privacy and security.
In the meantime, vigilance, skepticism, and strong digital literacy remain the first line of defense against the growing threat of AI-enabled fraud. (NAN)
Medical Misdiagnosis: A Silent Threat in Nigeria’s Healthcare System
By Victor Adeoti
Titiloye Aare’s near-fatal experience with a high blood pressure misdiagnosis highlights a critical flaw in Nigeria’s healthcare system, where medical errors put lives at risk and strain already limited resources.
For many patients in Nigeria, a visit to the hospital is expected to bring relief and healing.
However, growing cases of medical misdiagnosis are raising concerns among experts and patients alike, as wrong diagnoses expose individuals to dangerous treatments and life-threatening complications.
Aare recounted how a wrong diagnosis at a private hospital in February 2025 led to medication that caused her to lose consciousness and nearly cost her life.
She said she was in her shop in Osogbo when she suddenly felt dizzy and fainted while attending to a customer; she was rushed to a nearby private hospital, revived, and later diagnosed with high blood pressure.
Doctors immediately placed her on medication to lower her blood pressure.
However, in April of the same year, she experienced another dizzy spell and again lost consciousness.
She was rushed to a general hospital, where doctors discovered that the medication she had been taking had lowered her blood pressure below normal levels.
“When I asked the doctor why the medication caused me to faint, he explained that it had lowered my blood pressure below the normal range,” she said.
Doctors at the general hospital later informed her that she had been wrongly diagnosed at the first hospital.
Doctors later explained that her condition was vasovagal syncope, a medical condition caused by a sudden drop in heart rate and blood pressure, which reduces blood flow to the brain and leads to a brief loss of consciousness.
They warned that the continued use of medication prescribed to lower blood pressure could have severely reduced blood flow to her heart and brain, potentially resulting in death.
Aare’s experience reflects a growing concern about medical misdiagnosis in Nigeria.
While some patients survive to share their stories, others are not as fortunate.
Medical experts say accurate diagnosis is the foundation of effective healthcare.
When a condition is correctly identified, appropriate treatment can begin promptly, improving recovery and reducing complications.
Yet misdiagnosis—where a patient’s illness is wrongly identified or overlooked—remains a serious but often underreported problem in many parts of Nigeria.
In some cases, patients receive treatment for illnesses such as malaria or typhoid when the actual condition may be bacterial infections, viral diseases, or chronic conditions.
Misdiagnosis occurs when a healthcare professional incorrectly identifies a disease, delays its identification, or fails to detect it entirely.
This may result in wrong treatment or no treatment at all, often leading to prolonged illness, worsening conditions, unnecessary financial costs, and sometimes death.
A Consultant Paediatrician at Osun State University Teaching Hospital, Dr Funmi Adesokan, said many hospitals, particularly public ones, lacked the diagnostic equipment needed for accurate patient evaluation.
“This leads to delays in diagnosis or the inability to make a conclusive diagnosis. Public-private partnerships may help provide equipment, but improved government funding is essential,” she said.
Adesokan, however, cautioned that isolated mistakes should not define the entire healthcare system.
Similarly, a gynaecologist, Dr Nurudeen Iyanda, said many hospitals and clinics lacked modern diagnostic equipment required for accurate diagnosis.
“Many modern diagnostic tools, such as advanced laboratory equipment, imaging machines, and reliable testing facilities, are not available in many hospitals.
“Without proper equipment, healthcare providers often rely on symptoms alone, increasing the chances of error,” he said.
Dr Adeniyi Fasanu, Chairman of the Nigerian Medical Association (NMA) in Osun, said misdiagnosis is also fueled by a shortage of manpower.
“Many medical professionals have left the country due to poor remuneration and insecurity, leaving remaining doctors overworked and overstretched.
“The shortage has also created opportunities for unqualified individuals to operate medical facilities and treat unsuspecting patients.
“This is creating havoc in the health system,” he said.
Fasanu noted that the WHO recommends a doctor-to-patient ratio of 1:600, but in Nigeria one doctor may serve up to 2,500 patients.
He added that many government hospitals relied on obsolete equipment, making it difficult for doctors to practise effectively, and appealed to the government to prioritise the health sector and welfare of medical personnel.
On legal remedies, a lawyer, Mr Albert Akinwale, said victims of wrong diagnosis can seek redress in court under Nigerian law.
According to Akinwale, sections 303 and 343 of the Criminal Code provide that any act of negligence that endangers life or causes harm could attract criminal liability.
He said victims could also rely on the law of tort to claim medical negligence, breach of duty of care, and compensation for pain, suffering, and financial losses.
“Victims are protected under various provisions of Nigerian law, including the Criminal Code, Penal Code, and civil laws on negligence.
“Sections 15 and 16 of the Medical and Dental Practitioners Act provide for disciplinary procedures, including warnings, suspension, or striking off a doctor’s name from the medical register.
“The Medical and Dental Council of Nigeria (MDCN) also has the authority to discipline erring practitioners”, he said.
Akinwale urged patients who suspect misdiagnosis to seek a second medical opinion and explore legal or regulatory remedies where harm has occurred.
Public affairs analyst, Mr Olusegun Ayanda, said addressing misdiagnosis required coordinated efforts from government, healthcare institutions, and medical professionals.
Ayanda stressed the need for improved diagnostic infrastructure, investment in modern laboratories and equipment, continuous professional development programmes for healthcare workers, and recruitment of more professionals to reduce patient-to-doctor ratios.
Similarly, the Chief Medical Director of the Obafemi Awolowo University Teaching Hospital Complex (OAUTHC), Ile-Ife, called on the Federal Government to increase funding for the healthcare sector and improve the availability of modern medical equipment.
Okeniyi said the sector had long suffered from inadequate funding, resulting in limited resources for upgrading equipment, purchasing new medical supplies, and maintaining existing infrastructure.
According to him, the healthcare system requires adequate supplies, improved infrastructure, and a comprehensive overhaul of the remuneration structure for health personnel to align with global best practices.
The CMD noted that if indeed “health is wealth,” the country must invest more in the sector and implement mandatory continuous professional development programmes for healthcare workers to keep them updated with the latest medical knowledge and best practices.
Medical experts say misdiagnosis has consequences beyond individual patients. Families may spend significant sums on treatments that fail to address the actual illness.
Although misdiagnosis is a serious challenge, experts say it can be reduced through investment in medical infrastructure, improved training, stronger healthcare policies, and increased public awareness.
Obtaining an accurate diagnosis, as experts emphasise, is vital for effective treatment; it builds public confidence in Nigeria’s healthcare system and ensures citizens remain safe and healthy. (NAN)
Featured
Enugu’s New Gaming Law Signals: A Turning Point for Nigeria’s Gaming Regulation
By Ejiofo Agada
Enugu State has introduced one of the most comprehensive and forward-looking gaming regulatory frameworks in Nigeria with the enactment of its new Gaming and Lottery Commission Law. Far from a routine legislative update, the law establishes a practical, enforcement-driven system designed to address long-standing gaps in the regulation of gaming activities at subnational level.
As gaming continues to expand rapidly across Nigeria—spanning retail outlets, online platforms, and emerging digital formats—many regulatory frameworks have struggled to keep pace.
Enugu’s new law responds to this challenge by prioritizing visibility, compliance, and consumer protection, while creating room for innovation under clear regulatory oversight.One of the law’s most notable features is the introduction of a mandatory Gaming Approval Sign, which must be prominently displayed by all licensed operators. This requirement provides an immediate and visible way to distinguish licensed gaming outlets from illegal operations. For consumers, it offers a simple assurance of legitimacy. For regulators and law enforcement agencies, it simplifies identification and enforcement, reducing the ambiguity that has historically enabled illegal operators to thrive.
The law also establishes a structured Gaming Inspectorate with clearly defined statutory powers. Under this framework, designated monitoring and inspection officers are authorised to enter licensed premises, inspect gaming equipment, audit records, question suspected violators, and take enforcement action where necessary.
By granting legal immunity to inspectors acting in good faith, the law strengthens regulatory authority and ensures that enforcement is not undermined by intimidation or procedural loopholes.
Beyond compliance and enforcement, the new law places strong emphasis on social responsibility. It creates the Enugu State Gaming and Lottery Commission Charitable Trust Fund, funded primarily through unclaimed winnings and statutory good-cause contributions from licensed operators. The Trust Fund is dedicated to supporting education, health, psychological services, and other public-interest initiatives approved under the law.
This approach marks a shift in how gaming revenue is treated. Rather than relying on voluntary corporate social responsibility initiatives, the law embeds social impact directly into the regulatory framework, ensuring that gaming activities contribute measurably to community development and public welfare.
Crucially, the law is designed with the future of gaming in mind. It explicitly provides for the regulation of online and remote gaming, e-sports, virtual and augmented reality platforms, and blockchain-based gaming. By granting the Commission authority to license and regulate emerging technologies, the framework avoids the rigidity that has limited older gaming laws and positions Enugu to respond effectively to innovation without frequent legislative amendments.
The law also strengthens consumer protection through provisions on responsible gaming, data protection, underage gaming prevention, and transparent display of rules, odds, and winnings. These measures align Enugu’s framework with evolving international standards while reflecting local regulatory realities.
At a national level, the Enugu State Gaming Law enters the spotlight amid ongoing debates over the structure of gaming regulation in Nigeria, particularly the balance between federal oversight and state-level control. Enugu’s approach offers a practical model for decentralised regulation that is both robust and modern, combining visible compliance mechanisms, empowered enforcement, and structured social accountability.
In effect, the Enugu State Gaming and Lottery Commission Law goes beyond regulating gaming within the state. It establishes a benchmark for credible, transparent, and future-ready gaming regulation—one that other states, and potentially federal policymakers, may increasingly look to as Nigeria’s gaming sector continues to evolve.
Featured
Press Release
TOP10 MAGAZINE NAMES DANU AS 2025 MAN OF THE YEAR
Nasiru Danu, OFR, Chairman of Casiva Limited and founder of NHD Foundation, has been named as
The Top10 Magazine’s Man of the Year 2025. He emerged from among many other distinguished personalities in a multi-stage rigorous selection and screening process.
In a letter conveying Alhaji Danu’s selection as the Man of the Year 2025, the Board of Editors of the Magazine said it was in recognition of his milestone accomplishments in the business world as well as his philanthropic gestures of touching lives in different ways. These, the givers of the award said, clearly stand him out not only as a father of compassion, but Nigeria’s philanthropic leader of the year 2025.
“We consider your successful journey in the business world and your record of service to humanity as a clear demonstration of your ranking as a great leader of excellence worthy of commendation, hence the decision of our management to accord you this special recognition as the Top10 Magazine’s Man of the Year 2025,” the letter said.
In his latest demonstration of philanthropy, Danu, the Sardaunan Dutse, in May 2025, extended his good deeds to the Jama’atu Izalatil Bid’ah Wa’iqamatis Sunnah (JIBWIS) Islamic Centre as he commissioned a N150 million project at the Centre in Abuja. The project is a furnished 11-room building that will serve as the Imam’s residence at the Islamic Centre in the Guzape area of Abuja. It was named in memory of his late father, Haladu Danu.
The Top10 Magazine is a monthly publication established in 2016 as a platform to celebrate excellence and people of excellence from all human endeavours.
The Top10 Man of the Year Award was also instituted the same year as an annual award by the magazine to recognize and honour one outstanding personality in a given year that has recorded landmark accomplishments in the Nigerian society.
This year’s recipient, Alhaji Danu, a man of untainted character and impeccable reputation, is renowned for his unwavering commitment to success. The Chairman and CEO of Casiva Limited consistently strikes gold in every venture he undertakes and has since solidified his status as a true titan of the oil and gas industry who navigates its complexities with the expertise derived from years of experience. Apart from his involvement in philanthropy and Casiva Limited, Alh. Danu is also involved in other organizations. This includes NHD Interbiz Projects Limited, a construction and civil engineering company, Chairman, Yenagoa Polo Club, Chairman, Nigerian Army Polo Resort, reflecting his diverse interests, member Board of Trustee Nigerian Army Polo, Chairman, NHD Farms Ltd, Chairman, Lubrik Construction Company.
Mr. Tony Iji, Publisher/Editor-In-Chief of The Top10 Magazine, said the award will be presented to Alhaji Danu at The Top10 Magazine’s Annual Excellence Awards night slated for December 7, 2025 which will be graced by crème de la crème of the society.
To mark this high-profile event, the magazine is putting together a special award edition to celebrate him and other awardees. The edition will chronicle in detail all his milestone accomplishments as an industry leader, philanthropist as well as his career and personal antecedents.

