Oyo State Governor, Seyi Makinde has admonished traditional rulers in the state to be apolitical, insisting that the throne must remain neutral and be father to all.

Makinde stated this on Saturday in Eruwa during the 1st coronation anniversary of the Eleruwa of Eruwa, Oba Samuel Adegbola.

At the event, the governor was conferred with the chieftaincy title of Aare Asoludero of Ibarapaland.

Makinde advised traditional rulers to steer clear of politics and embrace all political actors without bias, warning that any of them found engaged in politics would be treated as a politician.

Makinde, who is the 2027 presidential candidate of the Allied People’s Movement (APM), said he was ready to traverse the length and breadth of Nigeria in pursuit of his ambition and to seek the support of Nigerians for his presidential bid.

He said his aspiration to lead Nigeria would not be confined to any particular region, stressing that he was prepared to take his message of good governance and development to Nigerians across the country.

“My presidential bid will require me to engage extensively with the people and present my vision for a better Nigeria to citizens in different parts of the country,” he said.

Makinde also expressed appreciation to the Eleruwa and the people of Ibarapaland for the honour, describing the conferment of the title as a recognition that came with responsibility.

He said that the honour would further strengthen his commitment to serving the people and contributing to the development of the country.

In his speech, Oba Adegbola said the honour bestowed on Makinde was in appreciation of his numerous achievements and giant strides across the state.

He pledged, on behalf of all the traditional rulers in Ibarapaland, that they would continue to support the administration of Makinde.

He also presented developmental requests from Ibarapaland to the governor, expressing confidence that the administration would continue to address them.

Among the requests are better road projects and other infrastructure development projects.

Speaker of the Oyo State House of Assembly, Mr Debo Ogundoyin, described Makinde’s administration as the best Ibarapaland has experienced since Nigeria’s return to democracy.

Ogundoyin commended ongoing projects, including the Ido–Eruwa Road and inner roads in Eruwa, noting that they have renewed confidence that no community would be left behind.

The event also featured the inauguration of the newly completed palace of the Eleruwa of Eruwa.

The event attracted traditional rulers, political leaders, government officials, and other dignitaries. (NAN)

Lagos State Governor, Babajide Sanwo-Olu has urged the media to uphold professionalism, verify information and combat misinformation ahead of the 2027 general elections.

Sanwo-Olu gave the charge on Thursday in Lagos, while speaking as the Special Guest Speaker at the seventh annual lecture organised by Freedom Online, with the theme, “2027 Elections, Economy, Security and Nigeria’s Future.

”

He said the media had a critical role to play in strengthening Nigeria’s democracy by providing citizens with credible information and holding political actors accountable.

The governor urged journalists and media organisations to go beyond reporting political activities and scrutinise information circulating on social media, particularly with the increasing use of artificial intelligence.

“The most dangerous information will not come from newspapers. It will come from anonymous accounts and doctored videos.

“You are the institution best placed to review, analyse, criticise and verify this information,” Sanwo-Olu said.

The governor urged the media to report the challenges confronting the country while also highlighting policies and initiatives capable of driving development.

“I am asking you to tell the whole story. I am not asking you to hide the problems; I am asking you to give the same energy to the things that work,” he said.

Sanwo-Olu also identified insecurity and economic development as closely connected issues, stressing that sustainable economic growth could not be achieved in an environment where citizens and businesses were unsafe.

“We speak of the economy and insecurity as though they were two subjects. They are one,” he said.

The governor said governments at all levels must continue to create an environment that would attract investment, support businesses and provide opportunities for young Nigerians.

According to him, job creation remains one of the most effective ways of empowering citizens and reducing social vulnerabilities.

“The most effective value is a job,” Sanwo-Olu said, stressing the need for policies that would expand economic opportunities and improve the standard of living of Nigerians.

On the removal of the fuel subsidy, the governor said the decision was driven by the need to address an unsustainable burden on the nation’s finances.

“The subsidy was not removed because anybody enjoyed removing it. The subsidy was removed because it had become an unsustainable national burden,” he said.

Sanwo-Olu urged Nigerians to continue to engage constructively in the democratic process, adding that the 2027 elections should further consolidate the country’s democratic experience.

“Whatever the outcome, I expect Nigeria to add one more milestone to its democratic record,” he said.

Earlier, the Special Guest of Honour, Sen. Gbenga Daniel, said Nigeria’s political and economic challenges required collective efforts and constructive engagement among stakeholders.

Daniel, a former governor of Ogun, said the country’s future depended largely on the ability of political leaders, professionals, the media and citizens to contribute positively to national development.

Also speaking, the Convener of the lecture and Publisher of Freedom Online, Gabriel Akinadewo, said the annual event was designed to provide a platform for stakeholders to examine critical national issues and proffer solutions.

Akinadewo said the choice of the theme reflected the importance of examining the intersection between elections, the economy, security and the future of Nigeria ahead of the 2027 elections.

By David Torough, Abuja

The Presidency has dismissed reports suggesting that President Bola Tinubu is facing a criminal case in the United States, clarifying that the ongoing litigation before a Washington, D.C.

, federal court is a civil dispute over access to government records under the U. S. Freedom of Information Act (FOIA).

Presidential Spokesperson and Special Adviser on Information and Strategy, Bayo Onanuga, made the clarification in a statement issued Thursday in Abuja, urging the Nigerian media and public to distinguish between verified court proceedings and what he described as partisan speculation.

“For clarity, the matter is a civil records-disclosure dispute under the United States Freedom of Information Act. It is not a criminal case against President Bola Ahmed Tinubu, nor has the court found him guilty of any criminal wrongdoing,” Onanuga said.

The dispute originated from FOIA requests filed by American transparency activist Aaron Greenspan in 2022 and 2023, seeking records from U.S. government agencies relating to a Chicago heroin-trafficking investigation dating to the early 1990s in which Tinubu was named alongside Lee Andrew Edwards, Mueez Abegboyega Akande and Abiodun Agbele.

After some U.S. agencies declined to confirm or deny the existence of the requested records, Greenspan instituted Civil Action No. 23-1816 before the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia in 2023.

Tinubu was subsequently permitted to intervene in the proceedings to protect his privacy interests.

The Presidency said several agencies initially relied on the “Glomar” defence, a legal mechanism under which an agency may neither confirm nor deny the existence of certain investigative records where disclosure could harm protected interests.

However, the court later ordered further processing of the records. According to the Presidency, the CIA, Executive Office for United States Attorneys, Department of State, Department of the Treasury and Internal Revenue Service were subsequently removed from the proceedings after obtaining summary judgment.

The remaining dispute centres on records held by the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) and the Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA).

The Presidency said the two agencies have, in compliance with court orders, produced 399 pages of records, although portions were redacted pursuant to exemptions contained in U.S. law.

Greenspan is challenging the withholding of the unredacted portions, while the FBI and DEA, through the U.S. Department of Justice, are defending the redactions.

The exemptions cited by the agencies cover grand jury proceedings and certain pen-register and trap-and-trace information; attorney-client and attorney-work-product privileges; law-enforcement materials; personal privacy; confidential sources; and investigative techniques.

The Presidency said Tinubu, acting on the advice of his lawyers, had also invoked FOIA Exemption 7(C), which provides protection against certain unwarranted invasions of personal privacy in law-enforcement records.

It stressed that the President’s opposition to disclosure should not be interpreted as an admission of criminal wrongdoing.

“The release or withholding of records under FOIA does not, by itself, establish criminal liability,” the statement said, adding that the issue before the court is whether the agencies’ redactions are lawful under U.S. law.

The Presidency also recalled a February 4, 2003 letter from the American Consulate in Lagos to then Inspector-General of Police Tafa Balogun, stating that an FBI records check had found no criminal arrest records, wants or warrants for Tinubu, who was then governor of Lagos State.

The current litigation remains before Judge Beryl A. Howell of the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia.

Greenspan has until September 11, 2026, to file his opposition and reply to processes filed by the defendants and Tinubu, while the FBI, DEA and the President have until September 18 to respond.

The Presidency also took aim at recent commentary by Washington-based lobbyist Karl Von Batten, saying neither Von Batten nor his client, former Vice-President Atiku Abubakar, is a party to the litigation.

Onanuga urged the Nigerian media to focus on the evidence and court filings rather than political interpretations, stressing that the outcome would be determined by the court under applicable U.S. law.

“The litigation is a civil records-disclosure dispute under FOIA. It does not constitute a criminal charge, trial, or judicial finding against President Tinubu,” the Presidency said.

Meanwhile,the International Criminal Court (ICC) has dismissed an anonymous case against Nigeria over alleged crimes against humanity, says Attorney-General, Lateef Fagbemi (SAN).

 Fagbemi, in a statement by his Special Adviser on Communication and Publicity, Kamarudeen Ogundele, disclosed this on Thursday in Abuja.

 He said the filing, titled ‘Formal Communication Requesting Investigation into Systemic Kidnappings in Nigeria as Crimes Against Humanity’, breached established ICC procedures.

 The document, numbered ICC-RoC46(3)-01/26, was submitted anonymously and sought an investigation into alleged systemic kidnappings in Nigeria.

 Fagbemi said the ICC’s Pre-Trial Chamber II dismissed the request at the threshold because it was improperly before the Court.

He said the Chamber also found that the communication lacked any legal basis for consideration under the Court’s governing framework.

 According to him, the dismissal followed an earlier procedural step which he described as improper.

He said the President of the Pre-Trial Division had assigned the unverified communication to Pre-Trial Chamber II under Regulation 46(3).

 “The Federal Government notes with serious concern that on August 26, the President of the Pre-Trial Division improperly initiated a procedural process,” Fagbemi said.

 He said the assignment occurred without a prior, reasoned determination on the Chamber’s competence or whether the communication was manifestly frivolous.

Fagbemi said the development breached “foundational procedural safeguards” established under the Court’s regulations.

 He identified the judges on Pre-Trial Chamber II as Rosario Salvatore Aitala, Sergio Gerardo Ugalde Godínez and Haykel Ben Mahfoudh.

The minister said Nigeria welcomed the Chamber’s swift dismissal but remained concerned about the initial handling of the anonymous communication.

He said the filing unusually bypassed established legal channels and could cast an unnecessary shadow over the Court’s judicial processes.

“The activation of internal registry mechanisms based on an unverified filing represents an unusual and troubling departure from the governing statutory framework,” he said.

Fagbemi said internal administrative guidelines could not be used to circumvent procedures established under the Rome Statute.

“The authority to evaluate information or request an investigation rests solely with the Prosecutor of the ICC,” he said.

He added that formal referrals could also originate from a State Party or the UN Security Council.

According to him, neither the President of the Pre-Trial Division nor any Pre-Trial Chamber has authority to receive anonymous petitions.

He said such bodies also lacked powers to interfere in the internal security matters of a sovereign nation.

Fagbemi warned that unchecked administrative handling of anonymous requests could undermine Nigeria’s relationship and cooperation with the ICC.

He stressed that Nigeria remained committed to the Rome Statute, international accountability and the rule of law.

“However, the primary constitutional responsibility for investigating and prosecuting domestic criminal activities, including kidnapping and banditry, resides firmly with Nigeria’s national judicial and law enforcement institutions,” he said.

The minister said this position was consistent with the fundamental principle of complementarity under international criminal justice.